All ICUs are not created equal: Evaluating pilot studies performed in different environments

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 294-297

  Morris, Peter E ^a   Munro, Cindy L ^b  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Critical care; Critical illness; Intensive care; International ICU standards; Manuscript preparations; Pilot; Randomized controlled trial; Reporting

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; HOSPITAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HOSPITAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 70349574875     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2009114     Document Type: Editorial

References (1)

1. European Federation of Critical Care Nursing Associations (EfCCNa). Position statement on workforce requirements within European critical care nursing. October 2007; Oulu, Finland. http://www.efccna.org/downloads/Position%20Statement%20Workforce%20EfCCNa%202007.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2009.