Patients' preferences for an increased pharmacist role in the management of drug therapy

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 275-282

  Tinelli, Michela ^a   Ryan, Mandy ^a   Bond, Christine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community pharmacist; Patient preferences; Precribing and dispensing pharmacist; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PHARMACIST; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 70349574091     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1211/ijpp.17.05.0004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Community Pharmacy Contracts. 2005. www.pjonline.com/noticeboard/series/ contract.html (accessed May 2007).
2. Department of Health. Improving Patients' Access to Medicines: a Guide to Implementing Nurse and Pharmacist Independent Prescribing Within the NHS in England. 2006. www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4133743 (accessed May 2009).
3. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Clinical Governance Framework for Pharmacist Prescribers and Organisations Commissioning or Participating in Pharmacist Prescribing. www.rpsgb.org.uk/pdfs/ clincgovframeworkpharm.pdf (accessed May 2009).
4. Nissen L. Prescribing rights for pharmacists in Australia - are we getting any closer? Pharmacist 2008; 7: 624-629.
5. Cooper RJ et al. Nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing in the UK - a thematic review of the literature. Health Policy 2008; 85: 277-292.
6. Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ 2004; 328: 60-61. (Pubitemid 38241179)
7. Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care: current practice and future prospects. Appl Health Econ Policy Anal 2003; 2: 55-64.
8. Ryan M et al Using Discrete Choice to Value Health and Health Care. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008.
9. Payne K, Elliott R. Using discrete choice experiments to value preferences for pharmacy services. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 9-20. (Pubitemid 40314142)
10. Ubach C et al. Using discrete choice experiments to evaluate alternative electronic prescribing systems. Int J Pharm Pract 2002; 10: 191-200.
11. Porteous T et al. Preferences for self-care or consulting a health professional for minor illness: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 911-917. (Pubitemid 44941788)
12. Scott A et al. Preferences of community pharmacists for extended roles in primary care. Pharmacoeconomics 2007; 25: 783-792.
13. Gerard K et al. Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients' preferences. J Health Serv Res Pol 2008; 13: 3-10. (Pubitemid 351702980)
14. Caldow J et al. Treatment of minor illness in primary care: a national survey of patient satisfaction, attitudes and preferences regarding a wider nursing role. Health Exp 2006; 10: 30-45. (Pubitemid 46310695)
15. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530-1533. (Pubitemid 30330316)
16. Louviere JJ et al. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
17. Bradley M. User's Manual for the Speed Version 2.1 Stated Preference Experiment Editor and Designer. The Hague: Hague Consulting Group, 1991.
18. Zwerina K et al. A General Method for Constructing Efficient Choice Designs. Working paper. Durham, NC: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 1996.
19. Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Design techniques for stated reference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003; 12: 281-294. (Pubitemid 36442817)
20. Maddala T et al. An experiment of simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences. Health Econ 2003; 12: 1035-1047. (Pubitemid 38035308)
21. Brooks R et al. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status using EQ-5D: a European Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.
22. Pearmain D et al Stated Preferences Techniques: a Guide to Practice. The Hague: Steer Davis Gleave and Hague Consulting Group, 1991.
23. Green WH. Limdep Version 8.0 Nlogit Version 3.0. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, 2003.
24. Scottish Consumer Council. Consumer Views of Community Pharmacies. Glasgow: Scottish Consumer Council, 2002. www.scotconsumer.org.uk (accessed September 2008).
25. Foppe van JW. Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacy: practice and research in Netherlands. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 1720-1725. (Pubitemid 41393133)
26. Bond C et al. Examining Alternatives for Remuneration of Community Pharmacy. Final report. Aberdeen: Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council, 2003.
27. The Community Pharmacy Medicines Management Project Evaluation Team. Community pharmacy-led medicines management: a randomised controlled trial in patients with CHD. Fam Pract 2007; 24: 189-200.
28. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertain 1988; 1: 7-59.
29. Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ 1980; 1: 39-60.
30. Porter M, McIntyre S. What is, must be best: a research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19: 1197-1200.
31. Cartwright A. The Dignity of Labour: a Study of Childbearing and Induction. London: Tavistock, 1979.
32. Ryan M et al. Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. Health Econ Letters 1998; 7: 373-378. (Pubitemid 28339965)
33. Ryan M et al. Using discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Qual Health Care 2001; 10: 155-160. (Pubitemid 32844130)
34. Salkeld G, Ryan M and Short L. The veil of experience: do consumers prefer what they know best? Health Econ Lett 2000; 9: 267-270.
35. Ryan M, Ubach C. Testing for an experience endowment effect in health care. Appl Econ Lett 2003; 10: 407-410. (Pubitemid 36743367)
36. Tinelli M et al. A patient-centred approach to policy development: a pharmacy-led medicines management service. Int J Pharm Pract 2006; 14: B71-B72.
37. Blumenschein K et al. Hypothetical vs. real willingness to pay in the health sector: results from a field experiment. J Health Econ 2001; 20: 441-457. (Pubitemid 32331842)
38. Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ 2009 (in press).
39. Chemist and Druggist. www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/. 2009. www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/c/portal/layout?p-l-id=287614&directoryId= 290706 (accessed February 2009).