Childhood leukemia and cancers near German nuclear reactors: Significance, context, and ramifications of recent studies

International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 318-323

  Nussbaum, Rudi H ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Childhood cancer; Childhood leukemia; Low dose radiation effects; Nuclear power; Nuclear reactors; Radiation health; Radiation safety; Radiogenic risks

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LEUKEMIA; NUCLEAR REACTOR; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RADIATION RESPONSE; RISK;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LEUKEMIA; NUCLEAR REACTORS; RISK;

EID: 70349573755     PISSN: 10773525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/oeh.2009.15.3.318     Document Type: Note

References (42)

1. Schmitz-Feuerhake I, Dannheim B, Heimers A, et al. Leukemia in the proximity of a boiling-water nuclear reactor: Evidence of population exposure by chromosome studies and environmental radioactivity. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105(suppl 6): 1499-1504.
2. Hoffmann W, Terschueren C, Richardson DB. Childhood leukemia in the vicinity of the Geesthacht nuclear establishments near Hamburg, Germany. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115:947-952.
3. Doll R, Wakeford R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Brit J Radiol. 1997;70:130-139.
4. Rossig C, Juergens H. Aetiology of childhood acute leukaemias: Current status of knowledge. Rad Prot Dos. 2008;132:114-118.
5. Wakeford R. Childhood leukaemia following medical diagnostic exposure to ionizing radiation in utero or after birth. Rad Prot Dos. 2008;132:166-174.
6. UNSCEAR. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report 2000. New York: United Nations; 2000.
7. BEIR VII. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. BEIR VII phase 2. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2008.
8. Valentin J. Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. Ann ICRP. 2005;35(4):1-140.
9. Michaelis J, Keller B, Haaf G, Kaatsch P. Incidence of childhood malignancies in the vicinity of West German nuclear power plants. Cancer Causes Control. 1992;3:255-263.
10. Kaatsch P, Kaletsch U, Meinert R, Michaelis J. An extended study on childhood malignancies in the vicinity of German nuclear power plants. Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9(5):529-533.
11. Körblein A, Hoffmann W. Childhood Cancer in the Vicinity of German Nuclear Power Plants. Med Global Surv, August 1999, Vol.6: 18-23.
12. Kaatsch P, Spix C, Schulze-Rath R, et al. Leukaemia in young children living in the vicinity of German nuclear power plants. Int J Cancer. 2008;1220:721-726.
13. Spix C, Schmiedel S, Kaatsch P, et al. Case-control study on childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Germany 1980-2003. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:275-284.
14. Gilman EA, Kneale GW, Knox EG, Stewart AM. Pregnancy Xrays and childhood cancers: Effects of exposure age and radiation dose. J Radiol Prot (UK). 1988;8(1):3-8.
15. 239Pu: Its relationship to haemopoietic damage. Rad Prot Dosim. 1992;41:163-167.
16. Busby C, Lengfelder E, Pflugbeil S, Schmitz-Feuerhake I. The evidence of radiation effects in embryos and fetuses exposed to Chernobyl fallout and the question of dose response. Med Conflict Surv. 2009;25(1):20-40.
17. Jöckel K-H, Greiser E, Hoffmann W. Epidemiologische Qualitätsprüfung der KiKK Studien [in German]. [cited 2007 March 4] Available from: http://www.bfs.de/de/kerntechnik/kinderkrebs/Qualitaetspruefung. html
18. Baker PJ, Hoel DG. Meta-analysis of standardized incidence and mortality rates of childhood leukemia in proximity to nuclear facilities. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16:355-363.
19. Hill, AB. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proc Roy Soc Med. 1965;58:295-300.
20. Little J, McLaughlin J, Miller A. Leukaemia in young children living in the vicinity of nuclear power plants. Int J Cancer. 2008; 122(4):xi
21. Kinlen L. Evidence for an infective cause of childhood leukaemia: comparison of a Scottish new town with nuclear reprocessing sites in Britain. Lancet 1988;2:1323-1327.
22. Laurier D, Jacob S, Bernier MO, et al. Epidemiological studies of leukaemia in children and young adults around nuclear facilities: A critical review. Rad Prot Dosim. 2008;132:182-190.
23. Pobel D, Viel JF. Case-control study of leukemia among young people near La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant: the environmental hypothesis revisited. BMJ. 1997;314:101-106.
24. Guizard A-V, Boutou O, Pottier D, et al. The incidence of childhood leukaemia around the La Hague nuclear waste reprocessing plant (France): a survey for the years 1978-1998. J Epidem Comm Health. 2001;55(7):469-480.
25. Laurier D, Hémon D, Clavel J. Childhood leukaemia incidence below the age of 5 years near French nuclear power plants. J Radiat Prot. 2008;28:401-403.
26. Körblein A. Early childhood leukaemia near nuclear power stations. A pooled analysis of data from recent ecological studies in Germany, England, and France. 2008. [cited 2009 February 22] Available from: www.alfred-koerblein.de/ cancer/downloads/ecological-studies.pdf.
27. Evrard A-S, Hémon D, Morin A, Laurier D, et al. Childhood leukaemia around French nuclear installations using geographic zoning based on gaseous discharge dose estimates. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(9):1342-1347
28. . 28. Körblein A. Private communication.
29. Bithell JF, Keegan TJ, Knoll E, et al. Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: Methodological issues and recent results. Rad Prot Dos. 2008;132:191-197.
30. Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311:485.
31. Baverstock K, Williams D. The Chernobyl accident 20 years on: an assessment of the health consequences and the international response. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1312-1317.
32. Nussbaum, RH. The Chernobyl Nuclear Catastrophe: Unacknowledged health detriment. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 115:A238-A239.
33. Baverstock K, Williams D. The Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe: Baverstock and Williams respond. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;115:A239.
34. Nussbaum RH. The linear no-threshold dose-effect relation: Is it relevant to radiation protection regulation? Med Phys. 1998;25:291-299.
35. Nussbaum RH, Köhnlein W. Inconsistencies and open questions regarding low-dose health effects of ionizing radiation. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102:656-667.
36. Sawada S. Cover-up of the effects of internal exposure by residual radiation from the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Med Conflict Survival. 2007;23(1):58-74.
37. Fairlie I. New evidence of childhood leukaemias near nuclear power stations. Med Conflict Survival. 2008;24(3):217-225.
38. Fairlie I. The hazards of Tritium revisited. Med Conflict Survival. 2008;24(4):306-319.
39. Persson L. The Auger electron effect in radiation dosimetry. Health Phys. 1994;67:471-476.
40. Schneeweiss FHA, Turtoi A, Pomplun E, Sutman G. Studies of the biological effectiveness of diverse Auger-emitters for the evaluation of the radiation weighting factor for Auger-electrons [in German]. Jülich (Germany): German Department for Environment, Nature Protection and Reactor Safety (BMU-2008-712); 2008. [cited 2008 December 5] Available from: http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/ allgemein/application/pdf/schriftenreihe-rs712.pdf.
41. Goldsmith JR, Kordysh E. Why dose-response relationships are often non-linear and some consequences. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1993;3(3):259-276.
42. Körblein A. Einfluss der Form der Dosis-Wirkungsbeziehung auf das Leukämierisiko [in German]. Strahlentelex 2008;524:8-10. [cited 2009 March 1]. Available from: http://strahlentelex.de/Stx-08-524-S08-10.pdf.