Science and technology parks: Habitats of innovation: Introduction to special section

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 499-510

  Bellavista, Joan ^a   Sanz, Luis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b International Association of Science Parks   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE; INNOVATION; LITERATURE REVIEW; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 70349572474     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234209X465543     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amabile, T M 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Amabile, T M 1997. Motivating creativity in organisations: on doing what you love, and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
3. Amabile, T M and R Conti 1999. Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 630-640.
4. Bellavista, J 2002. Developing science parks: theory and models matter. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, P Formica and L Sanz (eds), pp 241-262. Málaga, Spain: IASP.
5. Bellavista, J and V Renobell (eds.) 1999. Ciencia, tecnología e innovación en América Latina. Barcelona, Publicacions de la UB. Foreword by Federico Mayor Zaragoza (Director General, UNESCO).
6. Castells, M and P Hall 1994. Technopoles of the World. The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London and New York: Routledge.
7. Chesbrough, H W 2003. Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Clark, B 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Paths of Transformation, Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
9. Cooke, P 2001. From technopoles to regional innovation systems: the evolution of localised technology development policy. Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue canadienne des sciences régionales, XXIV(1), 21-40.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M 1996. Creativity. The Work and Lives of 91 Eminent People. New York: Harper Collins.
11. De Bono, E 1970. Lateral Thinking. Creativity Step by Step. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Eliasson, G 2000. Industrial policy, competence blocs and the role of science in economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1/2), 217-241.
13. Engel, J 2007. Understanding, fostering, and managing creativity and innovation. Paper presented at XXIV IASP World Conference, Barcelona,Spain, 1-4 July 2007.
14. Etzkowitz, H 1996. Conflicts of interest and commiT.M.ent in academic science in the United States. Minerva, 34(3), 259-277.
15. Etzkowitz, H 2002. Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
16. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff (eds) 1997. Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A Triple Helix of UniversityIndustry-Government relations. London and Washington: Pinter.
17. Etzkowitz, H and M Klofsten 2005. The innovating region: towards a theory of knowledge based regional development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
18. Florida, R 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
19. Florida, R 2005. The Flight of the Creative Class: the New Global Competition for Talent. New York: HarperBusiness.
20. Florida, R and I Tangli 2004. Europe in the creativity age Available at urlhttp://www.creativeclass.org/acrobat/ Europe_in_the_ Creative_Age_2004.pdf, last accessed 18 November 2008.
21. Formica, P and L Sanz (eds) 2002. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Readings in Science Park Policies and Prac tice. Málaga, Spain: IASP.
22. Garret-Jones, S, T Turpin, J Bellavista and S Hill 1995. Using Basic Research: Assessing Connections between Basic Research and Socio-economic Objectives. Canberra, Australia: National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Australian Government Publishing Service.
23. Gibbons, M 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
24. Goktepe, D 2005. University Owned Patents: Academic Patenting Patterns and Technology Transfer at Lund University, Sweden. Available at , last accessed 18 November 2008.
25. Goktepe, D 2006. A Comparative Study of University Scientists' Motivations to Patent: A Typology of Inventors. Available at , last accessed 18 November 2008
26. Guilford, J.P. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444-454.
27. Hernard, D H and M A McFadyen 2008. Making knowledge workers more creative. Research - Technology Management. 52(2), 40-46.
28. Hew, K F and N Hara 2007. Knowledge sharing in online environments: a qualitative case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2310-2324.
29. Hicks, D 1995. Tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 401-424.
30. Hill, S, T Turpin, A Deville, H Mitchel, S Liyanage, J Bellavista et al 1993. Crossing Innovation Boundaries: The Formation and Maintenance of Research Links between Industry and Universities in Australia (3 Vols). Canberra, Australia: National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Australian Government Publishing Service.
31. IASP, 2006. IASP General Survey 2006-2007. Malaga: IASP.
32. Kijkuit, B and J van den Ende 2007. The organisational life of an idea: integrating social network, creativity and decisionmaking perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 863-882.
33. Lundvall, B and B Johnson 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industrial Studies, 1(2), 23-42.
34. Lundvall, B (ed) 1992. National Systems of Innovation. Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
35. Miles, I. 2008. Patterns of innovation in service industries. IBM Systems Journal, 47(1), 115-128.
36. Murphy, P and D Pauleen 2007. Managing paradox in a world of knowledge. Management Decision, 45(6), 1008-1022.
37. Nonaka, I and H Takeuchi 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. OECD 2001. Cities and Regions in the New Learning Economy. Education and Skills. Paris: OECD Publications Service.
39. Piqué, J.M., S. González, J. Bellavista and V. Alves 2005. Science and technology parks and universities in the incubation system of technology-based companies: contribution from the triple helix model. Fifth Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy, 18-21 May.
40. Polanyi, M 1962. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
41. Roberts, R 2005. Issues in modelling innovation intense environment: the importance of the historical and cultural context. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(4), 477-495.
42. Romer, P M 1994. The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3-22.
43. Rubiralta, M and J Bellavista 2003. Nuevos mecanismos de transferencia de tecnología: Debilidades y oportunidades del sistema español de transferencia de tecnología. Madrid: COTEC.
44. Sanz, L.2005. Making science parks work. Paper presents at Seminar on Cooperation for Regional Innovation, Helsinki, June 2005.
45. Sanz, L 2006. Strategigram: a tool to deepen our understanding of science park strategies. Paper presented at BEI Seminar, Luxembourg, May 2006.
46. Sanz, L 2007. Strategic evolution of science and technology parks. Paper presented at SHIP Conference, Shenzhen, China, June 2007.
47. Sanz L 2008. Science and Technology Park strategies and models: choices to be made. Paper presented at XXV IASP World Conference of Science and Technology Parks, Johannesburg, South Africa, September 2008.
48. Solow, R 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320.
49. Solow, R 1994. Perspectives on growth theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 45-54.