Autogenous bone graft with or without perforation of the receptor bed: Histologic study in rabbit calvaria

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 463-468

  Zanetta Barbosa, Darceny ^b   De Assis, Wilson Ferreira ^a   Shirato, Fernanda Begheli ^a   Moura, Camilla Christian Gomes ^b   Silva, Claudia Jordão ^b   Dechichi, Paula ^b  

^a Federal University of Uberlândia ^*  (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Animal study; Cortical bone perforation; Experimental study; Histologic analyses

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE MATRIX; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREW; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CRANIOTOMY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; SKULL;

ANIMALS; BONE MATRIX; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SCREWS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CRANIOTOMY; MALE; PARIETAL BONE; RABBITS;

EID: 70349568653     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Nyström E, Ahlqvist J, Legrell PE, Kahnberg K-E. Bone graft remodeling and implant success rate in the treatment of the severely desorbed maxilla: A 5-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31: 158-154.
2. Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Nkenke E, Thorwarth M, Neukman F, Schlegel KA. Onlay augmentation versus sinus lift procedure in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: A 5- year comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34: 885-889.
3. Ulm C, Solar P, Blahout R, Matejka M, Gruber H. Reduction of the compact and cancellous bone substances of the edentulous mandible caused by resorption. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74: 131-136.
4. Coradazzi LF, Garcia IR, Manfrin TM. Evaluation of autogenous bone grafts, particulate or collected during osteotomy with implant burs: Histological and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22: 201-207.
5. Faria PEP, Okamoto R, Bonilha-Neto RM, Xavier SP, Santos AC, Salata LA. Immunohistochemical, tomographic, and histological study on onlay iliac grafts remodeling. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 393-401.
6. Sandor GKB, Rittenberg BN, Clokie CML, Caminiti MF. Clinical success in harvesting autogenous bone using a minimally invasive trephine. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61: 164-168.
7. Finkemeier CG. Bone grafting and bone graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg 2002;84: 454-464.
8. Kahan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13: 77-86.
9. Sandor GKB. The Minimization of Morbidity in Cranio-Maxillofacial Osseous Reconstruction. Bone Graft and Coral-Derived Granules as a Bone Graft Substitute [thesis]. Oulu, Finland: Institute of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Oulu, 2003.
10. Zerbo IR, Lange GL, Joldersma M, Bronckers AL, Burguer EH. Fate of monocortical bone blocks grafted in the human maxilla: A histological and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 759-766.
11. De Marco AC, Jardini MA, Lima LP. Revascularization of autogenous block grafts with or without an e-PTFE membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14: 744-747.
12. Delloye C, Simon P, Nyssen-Behets C, Banse X, Bresler F, Schmitt D. Perforations of cortical bone allografts improve their incorporation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;396: 240-247.
13. Ronpen EH, Biewr R, Vanheuser A, Zahedi S, Nusgens B. The influence of cortical bone perforations and of space filling with peripheral blood on the kinetics of guided bone generation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10: 85-94.
14. Cho CB, Chung HY, Shin DP, Park WJ, Baik SB. Early vascularization of membranous inlay bone graft in canine mandible model. J Oral Craniofac Surg 2002;13: 251-256.
15. Carvalho PSP, Vasconcelos LW, Pi J. Influence of bed preparation on the incorporation of autogenous bone grafts: A study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15: 565-570.
16. Slotte C, Lundgren D. Impact of cortical perforations of contiguous donor bone in a guided bone augmentation procedure: An experimental study in the rabbit skull. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4: 1-10.
17. Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15: 11-29.
18. Nishimura I, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. Effects of cortical bone perforation on experimental guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: 293-300.
19. Slotte C, Lundgren D, Sennerby L. Bone morphology and vascularization of untreated and guided bone augmentationtreated rabbit calvaria: Evaluation of an augmentation model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 228-235.
20. Alberius P, Gordh M, Lindberg L, Johnell O. Effect of cortical perforations of both graft and host bed on onlay incorporation to the rat skull. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104: 554-561.
21. Sullivan WG, Szwajkun PR. Revascularization of cranial versus iliac crest bone graft in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87: 1105-1109.
22. Majzoub Z, Berengo M, Giardino R, Aldini NN, Cordioli G. Role of intramarrow penetration in osseous repair: A pilot study in the rabbit calvaria. J Periodontol 1999;70: 1501-1510.
23. Min S, Sato S, Murai M, et al. Effects of marrow penetration on bone augmentation within a titanium cap in rabbit calvarium. J Periodontol 2007;78: 1978-1984.
24. Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Augmentation of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 75-82.