Generalizing the evaluation of medical image processing tools by use of gabor patterns

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 331-335

  Apelt, D ^a   Strasburger, H ^b   Rascher Friesenhausen, R ^c   Klein, J ^a   Preim, B ^d  

^a FRAUNHOFER MEVIS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^d OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mammography; Perception; Research design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; VISUAL ACUITY;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PERCEPTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 70349567564     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME9231     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Manning DJ, Gale A, Krupinski EA. Perception research in medical imaging. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 683-685.
2. Krupinski EA. The future of image perception in radiology: Synergy between humans and computers. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 1-3.
3. Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 2001; 28 (4): 419-437.
4. Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, Komi M, Hayakawa H, Hori S, et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 2004; 230: 347-352.
5. Zimmerman JB, Pizer SM, Staab EV, Perry JR, McCartney W, Brenton BC. An evaluation of the effectiveness of adaptive histogram equalization for contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1988; 7 (4): 304-312.
6. Graf B, Simon U, Eickmeyer F, Fiedler V. IK versus 2K monitor: a clinical alternative free-response Receiver operating characteristic study of observer performance using pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1067-1074.
7. Cederberg RA, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Shulman JD. Influence of the digital image display monitor on observer performance. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28 (4): 203-207.
8. Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF. Detection of lesions in mammographic structure. Proceedings of SPIE 1999; 3663: 304-315.
9. Apelt D, Peitgen HO. Contrast sensitivity in mammographic softcopy reading - determination with psychophysical procedures. Digital Mammography, 9th International Workshop, IWDM 2008: Tucson, AZ, USA: Springer LNCS 5116: 756-763.
10. Apelt D, Strasburger H, Rascher-Friesenhausen R, Klein J, Preim B, Peitgen HO. Contrast sensitivity in mammographic softcopy reading. Proceedings of SPIE 2009; 726318.1-726318.11.
11. Apelt D, Rascher-Friesenhausen R, Klein J, Strasburger H, Preim B, Peitgen HO. Impact of luminance distribution in the visual field on foveal contrast sensitivity in the context of mammographic softcopy reading. Proceedings of SPIE. 2009; 72630B.1-72630B.9.
12. Treutwein B. Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Minireview. Vision Res 1995; 35: 2503-2522.
13. Mello-Thoms C. Perception of breast cancer: eyeposition analysis of mammogram interpretation. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 4-12.
14. Mello-Thoms C, Chapman B. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening. Acad Radiol. 2004; 11: 894-908.
15. Campbell FW, Robson JG. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol 1968; 197: 551-566.
16. Simpson WA, McFadden SM. Spatial frequency channels derived from individual differences. Vision Res 2005; 45: 2723-2727.
17. Zetzsche C, Barth E. Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two-dimensional signals. Vision Res 1990; 30: 1111-1117.
18. Barth E, Zetzsche C, Rentschler I. Intrinsic two dimensional features as textons. J Opt Soc Am 1998; 15: 1723-1732.
19. Strasburger H, Rentschler I. Contrast-dependent dissociation of visual recognition and detection fields. Eur J Neurosci 1996; 8: 1787-1791.
20. Strasburger H. Indirect vision [Indirektes Sehen]. (in German). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2003.
21. Levi DM. Crowding - an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review. Vision Res 2008; 48 (5): 635-654.
22. Strasburger H, Harvey LO Jr, Rentschler I. Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and excentric view. Percept Psychophys 1991; 49: 495-508.
23. Strasburger H. Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. J Vis 2005; 5 (11): 1024-1037.
24. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Peterson E, Eyler WR. Subtle lung nodules. Influence of local anatomic variations on detection. Radiology 2003; 228: 76-84.
25. Krupinski EA. The importance of perception research in medical imaging. Radiat Med 2000; 18 (6): 29-334.