Computation of a probabilistic statistical shape model in maximum-a-posteriori framework

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 314-319

  Hufnagel, H ^a,b   Pennec, X ^a   Ehrhardt, J ^b   Ayache, N ^a   Handels, H ^b  

^a INRIA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Correspondence problem; EMICP; ICP; Registration; Statistical shape model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 70349566479     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME9228     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Werner R, Ehrhardt J, Frenzel T, Säring D, Lu W, Low D, Handels H. Motion Artifact Reducing Reconstruction of 4D CT Image Data for the Analysis of Respiratory Dynamics. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (3): 254-260.
2. Handels H, Werner R, Frenzel T, Säring D, Lu W, Low D, Ehrhardt J. 4D Medical Image Computing and Visualization of Lung Tumor Mobility in Spatio- temporal CT Image Data. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007; 76S: 433-439.
3. Säring D, Ehrhardt J, Stork A, Bansmann MP, Lund GK, Handels H. Computer-Assisted Analysis of 4D Cardiac MR Image Sequences after Myocardial Infarction. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45(4): 377-383.
4. Hacker S, Handels H. Framework for Representation and Visualization of 3D Shape Variations of Organs in an Interactive Anatomical Atlas. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (3): 272-281.
5. Lorenz C, Krahnstoever N. Generation of Point- Based 3D Statistical Shape Models for Anatomical Objects. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2000; 77: 175-191.
6. Bookstein FL. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics in group differences in outline shapes. Medical Image Analysis 1996; 1: 225-243.
7. Styner M, Rajamani KT, Nolte LP, Zsemlye G, Székely G, Taylor CJ, Davies RH. Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging 2003. pp 63-75.
8. Vos FM, de Bruin PW, Streeksa GI, Maas M, van Vliet LJ, Vossepoel AM. A statistical shape model without using landmarks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Pattern Recognition 2004. pp 714-717.
9. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1992; 14: 239-256.
10. Zhao Z, Theo EK. A novel framework for automated 3D PDM construction using deformable models. Medical Imaging 2005; Proc of SPIE: Vol 5747: 303-314.
11. Chui H, Win L, Schultz R, Duncan JS, Rangarajan A. A unified non-rigid feature registration method for brain mapping. Medical Image Analysis 2003; 7: 113-130.
12. Davies RH, Twining CJ, Cootes TF. A Minimum Description Length Approach to Statistical Shape Modeling. IEEE Medical Imaging 2002; 21 (5): 525-537.
13. Heimann T, Wolf I, Williams T, Meinzer HP. 3D Active Shape Models Using Gradient Descent Optimization of Description Length. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Pattern Recognition 2005. pp 566-577.
14. Cates J, Meyer M, Fletcher PT, Whitaker R. Entropy- Based Particle Systems for Shape Correspondences. In: Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2006. pp 90-99.
15. Tsai A, Wells WM, Warfield SK, Willsky AS. An EM algorithm for shape classification based on level sets. Medical Image Analysis 2005; 9: 491-502.
16. Kodipaka S, Vemuri BC, Rangarajan A et al. Kernel Fisher discriminant for shape-based classification in epilepsy. Medical Image Analysis 2007; 11: 79-90.
17. Peter A, Rangarajan A. Shape Analysis Using the Fisher-Rao Riemannian Metric: Unifying Shape Representation and Deformation. IEEE Transactions on the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2006. pp 1164-1167.
18. Chui H, Rangarajan A, Zhang J, Leonard C. Unsupervised learning of an atlas from unlabeled point-sets. IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2004; 26: 160-172.
19. Granger S, Pennec X. Multi-scale EM-ICP: A Fast and Robust Approach for Surface Registration. European Conference on Computer Vision 2002 in LNCS; Vol 2353: 418-432.
20. Hufnagel H, Pennec X, Ehrhardt J, Ayache N, Handels H. Generation of Statistical Shape Models with Probabilistic Point Correspondences and Expectation Maximization - Iterative Closest Point Algorithm. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2008; 2(5): 265-273.
21. Hufnagel H, Pennec X, Ehrhardt J, Handels H, Ayache N. Shape Analysis Using a Point-Based Statistical Shape Model Built on Correspondence Probabilities. In: Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2007; Part 1:. pp 959-967.
22. Styner M, Gerig G, Lieberman J, Jones D, Weinberger D. Statistical shape analysis of neuroanatomical structures based on medial models. Medical Image Analysis 2003; 7: 207-220.