Innovative approaches to option generation

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 237-258

  Jones, Peter ^a   Kelly, Charlotte ^b   May, Anthony ^b   Cinderby, Steve ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Option generation; Problem solving; Transport schemes; Transport land use strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349565385     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15677141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2009.9.3.3309     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bickerstaff, K. and Walker, G. (2005). Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes. Local Transport Planning Urban Studies, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2123-2144.
2. Cinderby, S. (2007). How Communities Can Use Geographical Information Systems. In: Clay, C., Madden, M. and Potts, L. (eds.) Towards Understanding Community: People and Places. Palgrave, pp. 163-177.
3. Cinderby, S. and Forrester, J. (2005). Facilitating the Local Governance of Air Pollution Using GIS for Participation. Applied Geography, vol. 25, issue 2, pp. 143-158.
4. Cinderby, S. and Forrester, J. (2008). Rapid Appraisal Participatory Geographic Information System (RAP-GIS) for out-of-the-box transport option generation, suitable for use with hard-to-reach groups. DISTILLATE Working Paper, SEI, York.
5. Cinderby, S. and Potts, L. (2007). Suspicious cartographers: Some realities of research into stakeholder understanding of the causes and possible prevention of breast cancer. Science and Public Policy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 345-354.
6. Cinderby, S., Snell, C. and Forrester, J. (2008). Participatory GIS and its application in governance: the example of air quality and the implications for noise pollution. Local Environment, vol. 13, no. 4. pp. 309-320.
7. Couclelis, H. (2005). "Where has the future gone?" Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, Issue 8, vol. 37, pp. 1353-1371.
8. de Bono, E. (1992). Six Thinking Hats Application Methods. APT/T: Des Moines, Iowa, USA.
9. DfT (2006). Full Guidance on Local Transport Plans, Second Edition, January 2006. Available from http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/ltp/guidance/fltp/fullguidanceonlocaltransport3657 (accessed August 2009).
10. Eddington, R. (2006). The Eddington Transport Study. Main report: Transports role in sustaining the UKs productivity and competitiveness. The Stationery Office, December 2006.
11. Hoinville, G. (1971). Evaluating community preferences, Environment and Planning, Issue 1,vol. 3, pp. 33-50.
12. Hopkins, R., Robbins, N. and James, D. (2001). Combining EMME/2 and ArcView GIS: The CAPITAL Model Case Study. Presentation to the 10th European User Conference.
13. Hsiao S.W. and Chou, J.R. (2004), A creativity-based design process for innovative product design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 34, issue 5, pp. 421-443.
14. Hull, A. (2009). Implementing innovatory transport measures: what local authorities in the UK say about their problems and requirements. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 202-218.
15. Hull, A. and S. Thanos (2008). Findings of the 'Phase 3' Survey on the Barriers to the Delivery of Sustainable Transport Solutions. A3 Final DISTILLATE Report, School of Built Environment, HeriotWatt University, April 2008.
16. Institute for Public Policy Research (2004). Lonely Citizens: Report of the Working Party on Active Citizenship. London: IPPR.
17. Jones, P. (1979). HATS: A technique for investigating household decisions. Environment and Planning A, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 59-70.
18. Jones, P. and Lucas, K. (2005). DISTILLATE, Project B: Option Generation - Literature Review. DISTILLATE Working Paper, December.
19. Jones, P. and Paskins, J. (2008). Identifying the accessibility problems of disadvantaged groups and generating solutions. Application to the Barnsley Dearne area of South Yorkshire. DISTILLATE Working Paper, CTS, UCL, April.
20. Jones, P. and Thoreau, R. (2008). Engaging with professional stakeholders in the Dearne Valley Area of South Yorkshire. Strategic problem identification and option generation: the case of Accessibility Planning. DISTILLATE Working Paper, CTS, UCL, March.
21. Jopson, A., May, A.D. and Matthews, B. (2004). Facilitating evidence based decision-making - the development and use of an on-line knowledgebase on sustainable land-use and transport. Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul.
22. Kelly, C., May, A. and Jopson, A. (2008a). The development of an option generation tool to identify potential transport policy packages. Journal of Transport Policy, vol. 15, issue 6, pp. 361-371.
23. Kelly, C., May, A., Jopson, A., Gawthorpe, S., Cook, A. and Tanner, G. (2008b). A KonSULT-based strategy option generator. DISTILLATE Working Paper, ITS, Leeds and TSG, Westminster, March.
24. King, S. (1989). Co-design: Process of Design Participation. Van Nost. Reinhold, U.S.
25. Kocak, N., Jones, P. and Whibley, D. (2005). Tools for Road User Charging (RUC) Scheme Option Generation. Journal of Transport Policy, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 391-405.
26. KonSULT (2008). Available from www.konsult.leeds.ac.uk (accessed August 2009).
27. Lucas, K. and Psaila, A. (2005). Day 2 Cumulative Environmental Impacts (workshop materials). In: Stevenson, C., Willis, R. and Walker, G. (eds.). Addressing Environmental Inequalities: Cumulative Environmental Impacts. Bristol: Environment Agency.
28. Luckman, J. (1967). An approach to the management of design. Operational Research Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 345-358.
29. Marsden G.R. and Snell C. (2009). The role of indicators, targets and monitoring in decision-support for transport. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 219-236.
30. May A.D. (2009). Improving decision-making for sustainable urban transport. An introduction to the DISTILLATE research programme. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 184-201.
31. May, A.D. and Taylor, M.A.P. (2002). KonSULT - developing an international knowledgebase on urban transport policy instruments. Presented at 25th Australasian Transport Research Forum, Canberra, October 2002.
32. Page, M., Kelly, C., May, A., Jones, P. and Forrester, J. (2009). Enhancing appraisal methods to support sustainable transport and land use policies. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 296-313.
33. Richey, T. (1998). General Morphological Analysis. A general model for non quantified modelling. Presented at the 16th EURO conference on Operational Analysis, Brussels.
34. Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (2008). Available from http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/files/documents/reports/j9760/j9760.pdf (accessed August 2009).
35. Shepherd, S.P., Koh, A., Balijepalli, C., Liu, R., Pfaffenbichler, P., Emberger, G. and Ash, A. (2009). Overcoming barriers to model use. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 277-295.
36. Te Brömmelstroet, M. and Bertolini, L. (2008). Developing land use and transport PSS: Meaningful information through dialogue between modelers and planners. Transport Policy, vol. 15, issue 4, pp. 251-259.
37. Vonk, G.A. (2006). Improving Planning Support: The use of planning support systems for spatial planning. Dissertation, KNAG, Netherlands Geographical Studies.
38. WebTAG Documentation (various). Available from http://www.webtag.org.uk/ (accessed August 2009).