In vitro fertilization: A private matter becomes public;La fécondation in vitro ... quand une question privée devient publique

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 181, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Renda, Bouzayen ^a   Eggertson, Laura ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANADA; EDITORIAL; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; BIRTH RATE; CEREBRAL PALSY; ECONOMICS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INSURANCE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NEWBORN; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREMATURITY; SOCIOECONOMICS;

BIRTH RATE; CANADA; CEREBRAL PALSY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; PERINATAL MORTALITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNIVERSAL COVERAGE;

EID: 70349564970     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: 14882329     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091408     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Human assisted reproduction 2008 live birth rates. Montréal (Qc) : The Society; 2008. Disponible : www.cfasonline.ca/index.php?option=com-content&view=article&id= 211%3Ahuman-assisted-reproduction-2008-live-birth-rates-for-canada&catid= 929%3Apress-releases&Itemid=460 (consulté le 20 juillet 2009).
2. Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S, et al. Preferences of subfertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1006-1009 (Pubitemid 47498354)
3. Højgaard A, Ottosen LD, Kesmodel U, et al. Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer - a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2673-2678 (Pubitemid 47434211)
4. Petterson B, Nelson KB, Watson L, et al. Twins, triplets and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ 1993;307:1239-1243 (Pubitemid 23330504)
5. Fiddelers AA, Severens JL, Dirksen CD, et al. Economic evaluations of single-versus double-embryo transfer in IVF. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:5-13.
6. Hughes E. Access to effective fertility care in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:389-390
7. Tiitinen A, Hydén-Granskog C, Gissler M. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2439-2441 (Pubitemid 39481262)
8. Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P, et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10:436-441 (Pubitemid 40485000)
9. Karlström PO, Bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2202-2207 (Pubitemid 47241867)
10. Directive clinique commune SOGC-SCFA. Directive clinique en ce qui concerne le nombre d'embryons à transférer à la suite de la fécondation in vitro. No 182, septembre 2006. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;102:203-216 Disponible : www.sogc.org/guidelines/documents/182F-CPG- Septembre2006.pdf