Using the colored eco-genetic relationship map with children

Nursing Research

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 304-311

  Driessnack, Martha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Art based inquiry; Children; Lay beliefs; Qualitative research; Social networks

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ART; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; FAMILY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; METHODOLOGY; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PEDIGREE; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ART; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COMMUNICATION; FAMILY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PEDIGREE; PEER GROUP; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 70349560271     PISSN: 00296562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181b49928     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ayres, L., Kavanaugh, K., & Knafl, K. A. (2003). Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 13(6), 871-883.
2. Bates, B. R. (2005). Public culture and public understanding of genetics: A focus group study. Public Understanding of Science, 14(1), 47-65.
3. Brooks, M. (2004). Drawing: The social construction of knowledge. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29(2), 41-49.
4. Christensen, P., & James, A. (2000). Research with children: Perspectives and practices. London: Falmer Press.
5. Coad, J. (2007). Using art-based techniques in engaging children and young people in health care consultations and/or research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(5), 487-497.
6. Coad, J., & Lewis, A. (2004). Engaging children and young people in research: Literature review for the National Evaluation of the Children's Fund. Retrieved July 14, 2007, from the NECF Web site http://www.ne-cf.org/briefing. asp?section=000100040009&profile=000100080003&id=909
7. Collins, S., Drew, P., Watt, I., & Entwistle, V. (2005). 'Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment. Social Science & Medicine, 61(12), 2611-2627.
8. Driessnack, M. (2005). Children's drawings as facilitators of communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 20(6), 415-423.
9. Driessnack, M. (2009). Growing up at the intersection of the genome era and information age. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 24(3), 189-193.
10. Forrest, L. E., Curnow, L., Delatycki, M., Skene, L., & Aitken, M. (2008). Health first, genetics second: Exploring families' experiences of communicating genetic information. European Journal of Human Genetics, 16(11), 1329-1335.
11. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112.
12. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children's naive theories of biology. Cognition, 50(1-3), 171-188.
13. Higginbottom, G. (2008). ''I didn't tell them. Well, they never ask''-Lay understandings of hypertension and their impact on chronic disease management: Implications for nursing practice in primary care. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(2), 89-99.
14. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. New York: Psychology Press.
15. Institute of Medicine. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
16. Kenen, R., & Peters, J. A. (2001). The Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM): A conceptual approach and tool for genetic counseling research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(4), 289-309.
17. Koehly, L. M., Peters, J. A., Kuhn, N., Hoskins, L., Letocha, A., Kenen, R., et al. (2008). Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: Communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 812-821.
18. Lanie, A. D., Epstein Jayaratne, T., Sheldon, J. P., Kardia, S. L. R., Anderson, E. S., Feldbaum, M., et al. (2004). Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(4), 305-320.
19. Lock, M., Freeman, J., Sharples, R., & Lloyd, S. (2006). When it runs in the family: Putting susceptibility genes in perspective. Public Understanding of Science, 15(3), 277-300.
20. McClean, S., & Shaw, A. (2005). From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge: An exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 729-749.
21. Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960-983.
22. Olsen, S., Dudley-Brown, S., & McMullen, P. (2004). Case for blending pedigrees, genograms and ecomaps: Nursing's contribution to the 'big picture.' Nursing & Health Sciences, 6(4), 295-308.
23. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
24. Peters, J. A., Hoskins, L., Prindiville, S., Kenen, R., & Greene, M. H. (2006). Evolution of the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(6), 477-489.
25. Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Giusti, R., Loud, J., Weissman, N., & Greene, M. H. (2004). Exploratory study of the feasibility and utility of the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM) in women at high genetic risk of developing breast cancer. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 130A(3), 258-264.
26. Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. NewYork: Ballantine Books. Pratt, M. W., & Fiese, B. H. (2004). Family stories and the life course: Across time and generations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Raman, L., & Gelman, S. A. (2005). Children's understanding of the transmission of genetic disorders and contagious illnesses. Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 171-182.
28. Roberts, D. F., & Foehr, U. G. (2008). Trends in media use. Future of Children, 18(1), 11-37.
29. Rowlands, M. (2001). The development of children's biological understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 35(2), 66-68.
30. Salmon, K. (2001). Remembering and reporting by children: The influence of cues and props. Clinical Psychology Review, 21 (2), 267-300.
31. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334-340.
32. Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55-74.
33. Vahabi, M. (2007). The impact of health communication on health-related decision making: A review of the evidence. Health Education, 107(1), 27-41.
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Vygotsky,L.S.(1978).Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Walter, F. M., Emery, J., Braithwaite, D., & Marteau, T. M. (2004). Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(6), 583-594.
37. Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.