Median effective dose of remifentanil for awake laryngoscopy and intubation

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 122, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1507-1512

  Xu, Ya Chao ^a   Xue, Fu Shan ^a   Luo, Mao Ping ^a   Yang, Quan Yong ^a   Liao, Xu ^a   Liu, Yi ^a   Zhang, Yan Ming ^a  

^a PLASTIC SURGERY HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Awake intubation; Laryngoscopy; Median effective dose; Remifentanil; Sedation and analgesia

Indexed keywords

ATROPINE; LIDOCAINE; MIDAZOLAM; REMIFENTANIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BRADYCARDIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOXEMIA; LARYNGOSCOPY; OPTIMAL DRUG DOSE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLASTIC SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPY; PIPERIDINES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 70349560001     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.13.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Finucane BT. Fiberoptic airway management techniques. In: Finucane BT, Santora FA, eds. Principle of airway management. 3rd ed. New York: Spinger-Verlag Inc; 2003: 93-113.
2. Sutherland AD, Williams RT. Cardiovascular responses and lidocaine absorption in fiberoptic-assisted awake intubation. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 389-391.
3. Randell T, Valli H, Lindgren L. Effects of alfentanil on the responses to awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990; 34: 59-62.
4. Andel H, Klune G, Andel D, Felfernig M, Donner A, Schramm W, et al. Propofol without muscle relaxants for conventional or fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a dose-finding study. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 458-461.
5. Beers R, Camporesi E. Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility. CNS Drugs 2004; 18: 1085-1104.
6. Machata AM, Gonano C, Holzer A, Andel D, Spiss CK, Zimpfer M, et al. Awake nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation: patient comfort, intubating conditions, and hemodynamic stability during conscious sedation with remifentanil. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 904-908.
7. Puchner W, Egger P, Puhringer F, Löckinger A, Obwegeser J, Gombotz H. Evaluation of remifentanil as single drug for awake fiberoptic intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46: 350-354.
8. Donaldson AB, Meyer-Witting M, Roux A. Awake fibreoptic intubation under remifentanil and propofol target-controlled infusion. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 93-95.
9. Reusche MD, Egan TD. Remifentanil for conscious sedation and analgesia during awake fiberoptic tracheal intubation: a case report with pharmacokinetic simulations. J Clin Anesth 1999; 11: 64-68.
10. Johnson KB, Swenson JD, Egan TD, Jarrett R, Johnson M. Midazolam and remifentanil by bolus injection for intensely stimulating procedures of brief duration: experience with awake laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1241-1243.
11. Mingo OH, Ashpole KJ, Irving CJ, Rucklidge MW. Remifentanil sedation for awake fibreoptic intubation with limited application of local anaesthetic in patients for elective head and neck surgery. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1065-1069.
12. Egan TD. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. A preliminary appraisal. Clin Pharmacokinet 1995; 29: 80-94.
13. Xue FS, Xu YC, Yang QY, Liu Y, Liao X, Liu JH, et al. Clinical experience of airway management and tracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients with scar contracture of neck. Chin Med J 2008; 121: 989-997.
14. Xue FS, He N, Liao X, Xu XZ, Xu YC, Yang QY, et al. Clinical assessment of awake endotracheal intubation using the lightwand technique alone in patients with difficult airways. Chin Med J 2009; 122: 408-415.
15. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ. Sensitivity experiments. In: Dixon WJ, Massey FJ, eds. Introduction to statistical analysis. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1983: 426-441.
16. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990; 10: 244-251.
17. Machata AM, Illievich UM, Gustorff B, Gonano C, Fässler K, Spiss CK. Remifentanil for tracheal tube tolerance: a case control study. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 796-801.
18. Paul M, Fisher DM. Are estimates of MAC reliable? Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1362-1370.
19. 95 of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for the smooth exchange of the tracheal tube for a laryngeal mask airway is 2.97%. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 184-188.
20. Simmons ST, Schleich AR. Airway regional anesthesia for awake fiberoptic intubation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 180-192.
21. Greenblatt DJ, Ehrenberg BL, Gunderman J, Locniskar A, Scavone JM, Harmatz JS, et al. Pharmacokinetic and electroencephalographic study of intravenous diazepam, midazolam, and placebo. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989; 45: 356-365.
22. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJ, Gambus PL, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 10-23.
23. Xue FS, Liu HP, He N, Xu YC, Yang QY, Liao X, et al. Spray-as-you-go airway anesthesia in patients with a difficult airway: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% and 4% lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 536-543.
24. Rai MR, Parry TM, Dombrovskis A, Warner OJ. Remifentanil target-controlled infusion vs propofol target-controlled infusion for conscious sedation for awake fibreoptic intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 125-130.
25. Yang QY, Xue FS, Liao X, Liu HP, Luo MP, Xu YC, et al. Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study. Chin Med J 2009; 122: 44-50.
26. Neidhart P, Burgener MC, Schwieger I, Suter PM. Chest wall rigidity during fentanyl- and midazolam-fentanyl induction:ventilatory and haemodynamic effects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989; 33: 1-5.
27. Cepeda MS, Carr DB. Women experience more pain and require more morphine than men to achieve a similar degree of analgesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1464-1468.
28. Jee D, Moon HL. Gender may affect the hemodynamic response to induction and intubation in young adults. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 563-567.
29. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 789-808.