Do listeners store in memory a speaker's habitual utterance-final phonation type?

Phonetica

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 150-168

  Bhm, Tamás ^a,c   Shattuck Hufnagel, Stefanie ^b  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NONE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HABIT; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONATION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HABITS; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PHONATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70349558093     PISSN: 00318388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000235658     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abberton, E.; Fourcin, A.J.: Intonation and speaker identification. Lang. Speech 21: 305-318 (1978).
2. Allen, S.J.; Miller, J.L.: Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 115: 3171-3183 (2004).
3. Bangayan, P.; Long, C.; Alwan, A.A.; Kreiman, J.; Gerratt, B.R.: Analysis by synthesis of pathological voices using the Klatt synthesizer. Speech Commun. 22: 343-368 (1997).
4. Batliner, A.; Burger, S.; Johne, B.; Kiessling, A.: MÜSLI: a classification scheme for laryngealizations. Proc. ESCA Workshop on Prosody, Lund 1993, pp. 176-179.
5. Belin, P.; Fecteau, S.; Bédard, C.: Thinking the voice: neural correlates of voice perception. Trends cogn. Sci. 8: 129-135 (2004).
6. Boersma, P.; Weenink, D.: Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.10); computer program, retrieved February 22, 2006, from http://www.praat.org/
7. Bõhm, T.: Is utterance-final glottalization a cue for speaker recognition by humans? 151st Meet. ASA, Providence 2006.
8. Bõhm, T.; Audibert, N.; Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.; Németh, G.; Aubergé, V.: Transforming modal voice into irregular voice by amplitude scaling of individual glottal cycles. Proc. Acoustics '08, Paris 2008, pp. 6141-6146.
9. Bricker, P.D.; Pruzansky, S.: Speaker recognition; in Lass, Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics, pp. 295-326 (Academic Press, New York 1976).
10. Bruce, V.; Young, A.: Understanding face recognition. Br. J. Psychol. 77: 305-327 (1986).
11. Carterette, E.C.; Barnebey, A.: Recognition memory for voices; in Cohen, Nooteboom, Structure and process in speech perception, pp. 246-265 (Springer, Berlin 1975).
12. Childers, D.G.; Lee, C.K.: Vocal quality factors: analysis, synthesis, and perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90: 2394-2410 (1991).
13. Dilley, L.; Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.; Ostendorf, M.: Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. J. Phonet. 24: 423-444 (1996).
14. Hedelin, P.; Huber, D.: Pitch period determination of aperiodic speech signals. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Albuquerque 1990, pp. 361-364.
15. Henton, C.G.; Bladon, A.: Creak as a sociophonetic marker; in Hyman, Li, Language, speech and mind: studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, pp. 3-29 (Routledge, London 1987).
16. Klatt, D.H.; Klatt, L.C.: Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 87: 820-857 (1990).
17. Kohler, K.J.: Investigating unscripted speech: implications for phonetics and phonology. Phonetica 57: 85-94 (2000).
18. Malyska, N.: Analysis of nonmodal glottal event patterns with application to automatic speaker recognition; PhD diss. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge (2008).
19. Matsumoto, H.; Hiki, S.; Sone, T.; Nimura, T.: Multidimensional representation of personal quality of vowels and its acoustical correlates. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-21: 428-436 (1973).
20. Moulines, E.; Charpentier, F.: Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Commun. 9: 453-467 (1990).
21. Moulines, E.; Laroche, J.: Non-parametric techniques for pitch-scale and time-scale modification of speech. Speech Commun. 16: 175-205 (1995).
22. Nolan, F.: The phonetic bases of speaker recognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1983).
23. Pierrehumbert, J.B.; Frisch, S.: Synthesizing allophonic glottalization; in van Santen, Progress in speech synthesis, pp. 9-26 (Springer, New York 1997).
24. Pollack, I.; Pickett, J.M.; Sumby, W.H.: On the identification of speakers by voice. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 26: 403-406 (1954).
25. Redi, L.; Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.: Variation in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers. J. Phonet. 29: 407-429 (2001).
26. Sidtis, D.; Kreiman, J.: Let's face it: phonagnosia happens, and voice recognition is finally familiar; in Pachalska Weber, Neuropsychology and philosophy of mind in process - essays in honor of Jason W. Brown (Ontos, Frankfurt 2008).
27. Slifka, J.: Respiratory constraints on speech production at prosodic boundaries; PhD diss. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge (2000).
28. Slifka, J.: Some physiological correlates to regular and irregular phonation at the end of an utterance. J. Voice 20: 171-186 (2006).
29. Surana, K.; Slifka, J.: Acoustic cues for the classification of regular and irregular phonation. Proc. 9th Interspeech, Pittsburgh 2006, pp. 693-696.
30. Titze, I.R.: Definitions and nomenclature related to voice quality; in Fujimura, Hirano, Vocal fold physiology - voice quality control, pp. 335-342 (Singular, San Diego 1995).
31. Van Lancker, D.; Kreiman, J.; Emmorey, K.: Familiar voice recognition: patterns and parameters: part I. J. Phonet. 13: 19-38 (1985a).
32. Van Lancker, D.; Kreiman, J.; Wickens, T.D.: Familiar voice recognition: patterns and parameters: part II. J. Phonet. 13: 39-52 (1985b).