All-or-nothing versus proportionate damages

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 345-382

  Leshem, Shmuel ^a   Miller, Geoffrey P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349556584     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/593153     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abramowicz, Michael. 2001. A Compromise Approach to Compromise Verdicts. California Law Review 89:231-313.
2. Allen, Francis A., et al. 1964. Comments on "Approaches to Court Imposed Compromise-the Uses of Doubt and Reason." Northwestern University Law Review 58:795-805.
3. Coons, John E. 1964. Approaches to Court Imposed Compromise-the Uses of Doubt and Reason. Northwestern University Law Review 58:750-794.
4. 1980. Compromise as Precise Justice. California Law Review 68:250-62.
5. Daughety, Andrew F., and Jennifer F. Reinganum. 2000. On the Economics of Trials: Adversarial Process, Evidence, and Equilibrium Bias. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16:365-394.
6. Demougin, Dominique, and Claude Fluet. 2006. Preponderance of Evidence. European Economic Review 50:963-976.
7. Eisenberg, Theodore, and Geoffrey P. Miller. 2006. The Flight from Arbitration: An Empirical Study of Ex Ante Arbitration Clauses in Publicly-Held Companies' Contracts. Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-023. Cornell University Law School, Ithaca, N.Y.
8. Gutierrez, Maria. 2003. An Economic Analysis of Corporate Directors' Fiduciary Duties. Rand Journal of Economics 34:516-535.
9. Hylton, Keith N. 1990. Costly Litigation and Legal Error under Negligence. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6:433-452.
10. Kaplan, John. 1968. Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process. Stanford Law Review 20:1065-1092.
11. Kaye, David H. 1982. The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 7:487-516.
12. Koehler, Jonathan J. 2002. When Do Courts Think Base Rate Statistics Are Relevant? Jurimetrics Journal 42:373-402.
13. Lando, Henrik. 2002. When Is the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard Optimal? Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 27:602-608.
14. Leshem, Shmuel, and Geoffrey M. Miller. 2008. All-or-Nothing versus Proportionate Damages. NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 08-14. New York University Law School, New York.
15. Levmore, Saul. 1990. Probabilistic Recoveries, Restitution, and Recurring Wrongs. Journal of Legal Studies 19:691-726.
16. Orloff, Neil, and Jery Stedinger. 1983. A Framework for Evaluating the Preponderance-of-the-Evidence Standard. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 131:1159-1174.
17. Polinsky, A. Mitchell, and Steven Shavell. 1989. Legal Error, Litigation, and the Incentive to Obey the Law. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 5:99-108.
18. Posner, Richard A. 1999. An Economic Approach to the Law of Evidence. Stanford Law Review 51:1477-1546.
19. Shavell, Steven. 1985. Uncertainty over Causation and the Determination of Civil Liability. Journal of Law and Economics 28:587-609.