Multi-resolution segmentation for object-based classification and accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remotely sensed data

Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 189-201

  Rahman, M Rejaur ^a   Saha, S K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RAJSHAHI   (Bangladesh)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF REMOTE SENSING   (India)

Author keywords

Image segmentation; Land use Land cover; Object based classification; Pixel based classification

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA;

EID: 70349528259     PISSN: 0255660X     EISSN: 09743006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-008-0020-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ambiente H (2000) eCogntition and Change Detection- Integrating Aerial Photos and Satellite Images. http://www.definins.com. eCognition Application Notes, Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2000
2. Baatz M and Schape A (2000) Multiresolution segmentation-an optimization approach for high quality multiscale image segmentation. In Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII. (Eds: Strobl, J. and Blaschke, T.), Beitrage zum AGIT-Symposium Salzburg 2000, Karhlsruhe, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, pp.12-23
3. Baatz M, Benz U, Dehghani S, Heynen M, Holtje A, Hofmann P, Lingenfelder I, Mimler M, Sohlbach M, Weber M, Willhauck G (2001) eCognotion Object-oriented Image Analysis, V.2.2 User Guide. Definiens Imaging, Munchen, Germany
4. Blaschke T, Lang S, Lorup E and Brown DW (2000). Object-oriented Image Processing in an integrated GIS/Remote Sensing Environment and Perspectives for Environmental Applications. In Enviromental Information for Planning, Politics and the Public, Cremers, A. and Greve, K., Marburg: metropolis-Verlag, pp 555-570
5. Congalton RG and Mead RA (1983) A Quantitative Method to Test for Consistency and Correctness in Photointer pretation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote sensing, 49(1):69-74
6. Congalton RG (1991) A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37:35-46
7. Definiens Imaging (2003) eCognition User Guide [Online]. Available: http://www.definiens-imaging.com/documents/index.htm, April, 2003
8. Gorte B (1998) Probabilistic Segmentation of Remotely Sensed Images. ITC Publication Series No. 63, Enschede, ITC Publication
9. Ioannis M (2001) eCognition and Precision Farming. http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~lnn. eCognition Application Notes, Vol. 2, No 2, April 2001
10. Jensen JR (1996) Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
11. Mather P (1999) Computer Processing of Remotely Sensed Images. Chichester, Wiley.
12. Rosenfield GH and Fitz-partrick-Lins K (1986) A Coefficient of Agreement as a Measure of Thematic Classification Accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(2):223-227
13. Tso B and Mather PM (2001) Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. Taylor and Francis Inc, London
14. Verbyla DL (2002) Practical GIS Analysis. Taylor and Francis, London