Resonance phenomenon related to spectral singularities, complex barrier potential, and resonating waveguides

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Mostafazadeh, Ali ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARRIER POTENTIAL; ENERGY EIGENVALUES; REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS; RESONANCE EFFECT; RESONANCE PHENOMENA; RESONANCE STATE; SCATTERING POTENTIALS; SCATTERING STATE; SPECTRAL SINGULARITIES; VISIBLE SPECTRA;

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; RESONANCE;

WAVEGUIDES;

EID: 70349513783     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032711     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. A. Mostafazadeh, e-print arXiv:0810.5643.
2. A. Mostafazadeh, J. Phys. A 39, 10171 (2006). 10.1088/0305-4470/39/32/S18
3. W. D. Heiss, J. Phys. A 37, 2455 (2004). 10.1088/0305-4470/37/6/034
4. M. A. Naimark, Trudy Moskow Mat. Obshch. 3, 181 (1954)
5. [M. A. Naimark, Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 16, 103 (1960).]
6. W. D. Heiss, Phys. Rep. 242, 443 (1994) 10.1016/0370-1573(94)90177-5
7. E. Narevicius and N. Moiseyev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2221 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2221
8. E. Narevicius and N. Moiseyev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1681 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1681
9. M. V. Berry, J. Mod. Opt. 50, 63 (2003)
10. M. V. Berry, Czech. J. Phys. 54, 1039 (2004) 10.1023/B:CJOP.0000044002. 05657.04
11. A. A. Mailybaev, O. N. Kirillov, and A. P. Seyranian, Phys. Rev. A 72, 014104 (2005) 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.014104
12. M. Müller and I. Rotter, J. Phys. A 41, 244018 (2008) 10.1088/1751-8113/41/24/244018
13. H. Mehri-Dehnavi and A. Mostafazadeh, J. Math. Phys. 49, 082105 (2008) 10.1063/1.2968344
14. S. Klaiman, U. Günther, and N. Moiseyev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080402 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.080402
15. C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, H. Rehfeld, and A. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 787 (2001) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86. 787
16. C. Dembowski, B. Dietz, H.-D. Gräf, H. L. Harney, A. Heine, W. D. Heiss, and A. Richter, Phys. Rev. E 69, 056216 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.056216
17. T. Stehmann, W. D. Heiss, and F. G. Scholtz, J. Phys. A 37, 7813 (2004). 10.1088/0305-4470/37/31/012
18. Here we only consider Hamiltonians of the form H=- (d2 / d x2) +v (x), where x is real and v (x) is a complex scattering potential.
19. A. Mostafazadeh and H. Mehri-Dehnavi, J. Phys. A 42, 125303 (2009). 10.1088/1751-8113/42/12/125303
20. A. Mostafazadeh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 220402 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.220402
21. B. F. Samsonov, J. Phys. A 38, L397 (2005) 10.1088/0305-4470/38/21/L04
22. B. F. Samsonov, J. Phys. A 38, L571 (2005). 10.1088/0305-4470/38/34/L02
23. M. A. Naimark, Linear Differential Operators, Pt. II (Ungar, New York, 1968).
24. A. Mostafazadeh, J. Phys. A 39, 13495 (2006). 10.1088/0305-4470/39/43/008
25. sgn (x) x/ |x| if x0 and sgn (0) 0.
26. A. Ruschhaupt, F. Delgado, and J. G. Muga, J. Phys. A 38, L171 (2005). 10.1088/0305-4470/38/9/L03
27. J. G. Muga, J. P. Palao, B. Navarro, and I. L. Egusquiza, Phys. Rep. 395, 357 (2004). 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.03.002
28. R. R. D. Kemp, Can. J. Math. 10, 447 (1958)
29. J. Schwartz, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13, 609 (1960) 10.1002/cpa. 3160130405
30. V. I. Ljance, Mat. Sb. 64, 521 (1964)
31. [V. I. Ljance, Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 60, 185 (1967)]
32. V. I. Ljance, Mat. Sb. 65, 47 (1964)
33. [V. I. Ljance, Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 60, 227 (1967)].
34. G. Sh. Guseinov, Pramana, J. Phys. 73, 587 (2009).
35. A. J. F. Siegert, Phys. Rev. 56, 750 (1939). 10.1103/PhysRev.56.750
36. We use 1-z/ k2 to denote the principal value of (1-z/ k2) 1/2 whose argument belongs to [0,π).
37. For example, typical numerical schemes will produce k values with a small imaginary part. These do not correspond to scattering states and must therefore be rejected.
38. This can be easily shown using Eq. 31.
39. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975).
40. Note that we use physicists' convention of expressing the time-harmonic part of the wave as e-iωt as opposed to engineers' convention that uses eiωt. This leads to a change in sign in the imaginary part of permittivity (and complex refractive index).
41. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Photonics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).
42. ωp2 is proportional to the difference between the number density of atoms in the ground and excited states which becomes negative due to population inversion.
43. Using MATHEMATICA and without making any special efforts we could zoom in the neighborhood of the relevant intersection point and obtain ρ and σ up to six significant digits for various values of Ω, n, and n.
44. Because of the symmetry of the problem, and as we can easily verify by inserting Eq. 9 in Eq. 6, the left and right reflection (and transmission) coefficients coincide: Rr = Rl R and Tr = Tl T.