Occupational exposure decisions: Can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?

Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 311-324

  Logan, Perry ^a   Ramachandran, Gurumurthy ^b   Mulhausen, John ^a   Hewett, Paul ^c  

^a University of Minnesota ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c Exposure Assessment Solutions Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Data interpretation training; Decision making; Desktop study; Exposure assessment; Judgment accuracy and bias; Professional judgment

Indexed keywords

DATA INTERPRETATION TRAINING; DESKTOP STUDY; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; JUDGMENT ACCURACY AND BIAS; PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT;

DECISION MAKING; MATERIALS HANDLING; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

AIR SAMPLING; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HYGIENE; INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT;

AIR POLLUTANTS, OCCUPATIONAL; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 70349482813     PISSN: 00034878     EISSN: 14753162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep011     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. (2005) Threshold limit values and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH.
2. Baron J. (2000) Thinking and deciding. 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cock J, Kromhout H, Heederik D et al. (1996) Experts' subjective assessment of pesticide exposure in fruit growing. Scand J Work Environ Health; 22: 425-432
4. Connolly T, Arkes HR, Hammond KR. (2000) Judgment and decision making: an interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Corn M, Esmen NE. (1979) Workplace exposure zones for classification of employee exposures to physical and chemical agents. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 40: 47-57.
6. Friesen MC, Demers PA, Spinelli JJ et al. (2003) Validation of a semi-quantitative job exposure matrix at a Soderberg aluminum smelter. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 477-484
7. Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U. (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats. Psychol Rev; 102: 684-704.
8. Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U. (1999) Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: a reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999). Psychol Rev; 106: 425-430
9. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM. (1999) ABC Research Group. (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. (2002) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Griffin D, Tversky A. (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cogn Psychol; 24: 411-435
12. Hawkins NC, Evans JS. (1989) Subjective estimation of toluene exposures: a calibration study of industrial hygienists. Appl Ind Hyg; 4: 61-68
13. Hewett P, Ganser G. (2007) A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Ann Occup Hyg; 51: 611-632
14. Hewett P, Logan P, Mulhausen J et al. (2006) Rating exposure control using Bayesian decision analysis. J Occup Environ Hyg; 3: 568-581
15. Hubbard DW. (2007) How to measure anything-finding the value of "intangibles" in business. John Wiley & Sons.
16. Ignacio J and Bullock B, editors. (2006) A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures. 3rd edn. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press.
17. Jayjock MA. (1997) Uncertainty analysis in the estimation of exposure. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 58: 380-382
18. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kahneman D, Tversky A. (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev; 80: 237-251.
20. Kahneman D, Tversky A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica; 47: 263-291
21. Kromhout H, Oostendorp Y, Heederik D et al. (1987) Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. Am J Ind Med; 12: 551-562
22. Macaluso M, Delzell E, Rose V et al. (1993) Inter-rate agreement in the assessment of solvent exposure at a car assembly plant. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 54: 351-359
23. Meyer MA, Booker JM. (2001) Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment-a practical guide. Society for American Statistical Association-Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
24. Mulhausen J and Damiano J, editors. (1998) A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures. 2nd edn. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press.
25. NicasM. (2003) An impractical emphasis. The Synergist; 47-52.
26. Nicas M, Jayjock M. (2002) Uncertainty in exposure estimates made by modeling versus monitoring. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 63: 275-283
27. Otway H, von Winterfeld D. Expert judgment in risk analysis and management: process, context and pitfalls. Risk Anal; 12: 83-93.
28. Plous S. (1993) The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw, NY: McGraw-Hill.
29. Post W, Kromhout H, Heederik D et al. (1991) Semiquantitative estimates of exposure to methylene chloride and styrene: the influence of quantitative exposure data. Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 6: 197-204. (ref shows that category judgment accuracy increases with more data).
30. Ramachandran G. (2008) Toward better exposure assessment strategies-the new NIOSH initiative. Ann Occup Hyg; 52: 297-301.
31. Ramachandran G, Banerjee S, Vincent JH. (2003) Expert judgment and occupational hygiene: application to aerosol speciation in the nickel primary production industry. Ann Occup Hyg; 47: 461-475
32. Rock JC. (1986) Can professional judgment be quantified? Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 47: A370.
33. Surowiecki J. (2005) The wisdom of crowds. New York: Random House Anchor Books.
34. Teschke K, Hertzman C, Dimich-Ward H et al. (1989) A comparison of exposure estimates by worker raters and industrial hygienists. Scand J Work Environ Health; 15: 424-429
35. Walker KD, Catalano P, Hammitt JK et al. (2003) Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment: Part 2. Calibration of expert judgments about personal exposures to benzene. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 13: 1-16.
36. Walker KD,MacintoshD, Evans JS. (2001)Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment: Part I. Characterization of personal exposure to benzene. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 11: 308-322
37. Wild P, Sauleau EA, Bourgkard E et al. (2002) Combining expert ratings and exposure measurements: a random effect paradigm. Ann Occup Hyg; 46: 479-487