Species Identity Cues in Animal Communication

American Naturalist

Volumn 174, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 585-593

  Ord, Terry J ^a,b   Stamps, Judy A ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anolis; Courtship; Meta analysis; Robot playback; Species recognition; Territoriality

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; CONSPECIFIC; COURTSHIP; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LIZARD; META-ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; SIGNALING; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TERRITORIALITY;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; LIZARD; MALE; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; ROBOTICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; ANIMALS; CUES; LIZARDS; MALE; RESEARCH DESIGN; ROBOTICS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; ANOLIS; ANOLIS GUNDLACHI; SQUAMATA;

EID: 70349482702     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/605372     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Bailey, N. W., and M. Zuk. 2008. Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:2645-2650.
3. Basolo, A. L. 2002. Female discrimination against sworded males in a poeciliid fish. Animal Behaviour 63:463-468.
4. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57:289-300.
5. Braaten, R. F., and K. Reynolds. 1999. Auditory preference for conspecific song in isolation-reared zebra finches. Animal Behaviour 58:105-111.
6. Bradbury, J. W., and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
7. -. 2000. Economic models of animal communication. Animal Behaviour 59:259-268.
8. Brandt, J. M. 2003. Lizard threat display handicaps endurance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:1061-1068.
9. Cardoso, G. C., P. G. Mota, and V. Depraz. 2007. Female and male serins (Serinus serinus) respond differently to derived song traits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61:1425-1436.
10. Cohen, J. 1969. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York.
11. Colegrave, N., and G. D. Ruxton. 2003. Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations. Behavioral Ecology 14:446-450. (Pubitemid 36647009)
12. Couldridge, V. C. K., and G. J. Alexander. 2002. Color patterns and species recognition in four closely related species of Lake Malawi cichlid. Behavioral Ecology 13:59-64.
13. Coyne, J. A., S. Y. Kim, A. S. Chang, D. Lachaise, and S. Elwyn. 2002. Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba. Evolution 56: 2424-2434.
14. Coyne, J. A., S. Elwyn, and E. Rolán-Alvarez. 2005. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 59: 2588-2601.
15. Dame, E., and K. Petren. 2006. Behavioural mechanisms of invasion and displacement in Pacific island geckos (Hemidactylus). Animal Behaviour 71:1165-1173.
16. de Kort, S. R., and C. ten Cate. 2001. Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. Animal Behaviour 61:239-247.
17. de Kort, S. R., P. M. den Hartog, and C. ten Cate. 2002. Vocal signals, isolation and hybridization in the vinaceous dove (Streptopelia vinacea) and the ring-necked dove (S. capicola). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:378-385.
18. den Hartog, P. M., S. R. de Kort, and C. ten Cate. 2007. Hybrid vocalizations are effective within, but not outside, an avian hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology 18:608-614.
19. Doucet, S. M., D. J. Mennill, and G. E. Hill. 2007. The evolution of signal design in manakin plumage ornaments. American Naturalist 169(suppl.):S62-S80.
20. Duffy, J. E., C. L. Morrison, and K. S. Macdonald. 2002. Colony defense and behavioral, differentiation in the eusocial shrimp Synalpheus regalis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:488-495.
21. Dukas, R. 2008. Learning decreases heterospecific courtship and mating in fruit flies. Biology Letters 4:645-647.
22. Friberg, M., N. Vongvanich, A.-K. Borg-Karlson, D. J. Kemp, S. Merilaita, and C. Wiklund. 2008. Female mate choice determines reproductive isolation between sympatric butterflies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62:873-886.
23. Gerhardt, H. C. 1982. Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. American Zoologist 22:581-595.
24. Gröning, J., and A. Hochkirch. 2008. Reproductive interference between animal species. Quarterly Review of Biology 83:257-282.
25. Gumm, J. M., and C. R. Gabor. 2005. Asexuals looking for sex: conflict between species and mate-quality recognition in sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58:558-565.
26. Gurevitch, J., and L. V. Hedges. 1993. Meta-analysis: combining results of independent experiments. Pages 378-398 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York.
27. Hankison, S. J., and M. R. Morris. 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behavioral Ecology 14: 282-287.
28. Hansen, B. T., and T. Slagsvold. 2003. Rival imprinting: interspecifically cross-fostered tits defend their territories against heterospecific intruders. Animal Behaviour 65:1117-1123.
29. Hedges, L. V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical methods for metaanalysis. Academic Press, New York.
30. Hoenig, J. M., and D. M. Heisey. 2001. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. American Statistician 55:19-24. (Pubitemid 33227057)
31. Kozak, K. H., L. A. Cirino, and M. B. Ptacek. 2008. Female mating preferences for male morphological traits used in species and mate recognition in the Mexican sailfin mollies, Poecilia velifera and Poecilia petenensis. Behavioral Ecology 19:463-474.
32. Lappin, A. K., and J. F. Husak. 2005. Weapon performance, not size, determines mating success and potential reproductive output in the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris). American. Naturalist 166: 426-436.
33. Leiser, J. K. 2003. When are neighbours "dear enemies" and when are they not? the responses of territorial male variegated pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus, to neighbours, strangers and heterospecifics. Animal Behaviour 65:453-462.
34. Leonard, M. L., A. G. Horn, and A. Mukhida. 2005. False alarms and begging in nestling birds. Animal Behaviour 69:701-708.
35. Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press, Berkeley.
36. Magurran, A. E., and I. W. Ramnarine. 2004. Learned mate recognition and reproductive isolation in guppies. Animal Behaviour 67:1077-1082.
37. Mays, H. L., and K. R. Hopper. 2004. Differential responses of yellowbreasted chats, Icteria virens, to male and female conspecific model presentations. Animal Behaviour 67:21-26.
38. McLennan, D. A., and M. J. Ryan. 1999. Interspecific recognition and discrimination based upon olfactory cues in northern swordtails. Evolution 53:880-888.
39. -. 2008. Female swordtails, Xiphophorus continens, prefer the scent of heterospecific males. Animal Behaviour 75:1731-1737.
40. Michaelidis, C. I., K. C. Demary, and S. M. Lewis. 2006. Male courtship signals and female signal assessment in Photinus greeni fireflies. Behavioral Ecology 17:329-335.
41. Mikami, O. K., and M. Kawata. 2004. Does interspecific territoriality reflect the intensity of ecological interactions? a theoretical model for interspecific territoriality. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 765-775.
42. Moore, I. T., H. Wada, N. Perfito, D. S. Busch, T. P. Hahn, and J. C. Wingfield. 2004. Territoriality and testosterone in an equatorial population of rufous-collared sparrows, Zonotrichia capensis. Animal Behaviour 67:411-420.
43. Nakagawa, S., and I. C. Cuthill. 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Review 82:591-605. (Pubitemid 47609922)
44. Nakagawa, S., J. R. Waas, and M. Miyazaki. 2001. Heart rate changes reveal that little blue penguin chicks (Eudyptula minor) can use vocal signatures to discriminate familiar from unfamiliar chicks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:180-188.
45. Nowicki, S., W. A. Searcy, M. Hughes, and J. Podos. 2001. The evolution of bird song: male and female response to song innovation in swamp sparrows. Animal Behaviour 62:1189-1195. (Pubitemid 34068010)
46. Nunes, T. M., F. S. Nascimento, I. C. Turatti, N. P. Lopes, and R. Zucchi. 2008. Nestmate recognition in a stingless bee: does the similarity of chemical cues determine guard acceptance? Animal Behaviour 75:1165-1171.
47. Ord, T. J. 2008. Dawn and dusk "chorus" in visually communicating Jamaican anole lizards. American Naturalist 172:585-592.
48. Ord, T. J., and J. A. Stamps. 2008. Alert signals enhance animal communication in "noisy" environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105:18830-18835.
49. Ord, T. J., D. T. Blumstein, and C. S. Evans. 2001. Intrasexual selection predicts the evolution of signal complexity in lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:737-744.
50. Patten,M.A.,J.T.Rotenberry,andM.Zuk.2004.Habitatselection, acousticadaptation,andtheevolutionofreproductiveisolation.Evolution58:2144-2155. (Pubitemid39448268)
51. Pearson, S. F., and S. Rohwer. 2000. Asymmetries in male aggression across an avian hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology 11:93-101.
52. Plath, M., D. Blum, I. Schlupp, and R. Tiedemann. 2008. Audience effect alters mating preferences in a livebearing fish, the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana. Animal Behaviour 75:21-29. (Pubitemid 350298093)
53. Price, T. D. 2008. Speciation in birds. Roberts, Greenwood Village, CO.
54. Ptacek, M. B. 1998. Interspecific mate choice in sailfin and shortfin species of mollies. Animal Behaviour 56:1145-1154.
55. Radesäter, T., S. Jakobsson, N. Andbjer, A. Bylin, and K. Nyström. 1987. Song rate and pair formation in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Animal Behaviour 35:1645-1651.
56. Riesch, R., I. Schlupp, M. Tobler, and M. Plath. 2006. Reduction of the association preference for conspecifics in cave-dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana. Behavioral Ecology and. Sociobiology 60:794-802. (Pubitemid 44387471)
57. Rollmann, S. M., L. D. Houck, and R. C. Feldhoff. 2003. Conspecific and heterospecific pheromone effects on female receptivity. Animal Behaviour 66:857-861.
58. Rollo, A., and D. Higgs. 2008. Differential acoustic response speci- ficity and directionality in the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus. Animal Behaviour 75:1903-1912.
59. Rosenfield, J. A., and A. Kodric-Brown. 2003. Sexual selection promotes hybridization between pecos pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis, and sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:595-606.
60. Rosenthal, R. 1994. Parametric measures of effect size. Pages 231-244 in H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges, eds. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage, New York.
61. Rowe, C. 1999. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Animal Behaviour 58:921-931.
62. Rowe, C., and J. Skelhorn. 2004. Avian psychology and communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271: 1435-1442.
63. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
64. Sedlacek, O., B. Cikanova, and R. Fuchs. 2006. Heterospecific rival recognition in the black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros). Omis Fennica 83:153-161.
65. Shettleworth, S. 1998. Cognition, evolution and behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
66. Shine, R., R. N. Reed, S. Shetty, M. Lemaster, and R. T. Mason. 2002. Reproductive isolating mechanisms between two sympatric sibling species of sea snakes. Evolution 56:1655-1662.
67. Spaulding, A. 2007. Rapid courtship evolution in grouse (Tetraonidae): contrasting patterns of acceleration between the Eurasian and North American polygynous clades. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological. Sciences 274:1079-1086. (Pubitemid 47056733)
68. ten Cate, C., and C. Rowe. 2007. Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference. Trends in Ecology 8c Evolution 22:380-387.
69. Teufel, C., K. Hammerschmidt, and J. Fischer. 2007. Lack of orienting asymmetries in Barbary macaques: implications for studies of Iateralized auditory processing. Animal Behaviour 73:249-255. (Pubitemid 46149568)
70. Wiley, R. H. 2006. Signal detection and animal communication. Advances in the Study of Behavior 36:217-247.
71. Wollerman, L. 1999. Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata. Animal Behaviour 57:529-536. (Pubitemid 29245130)
72. Wong, B. B. M., and G. G. Rosenthal. 2006. Female disdain for swords in a swordtail fish. American Naturalist 167:136-140.
73. Wong, B. B. M., H. S. Fisher, and G. G. Rosenthal. 2005. Species recognition by male swordtails via chemical cues. Behavioral Ecology 16:818-822.