The framework for sustainable eDemocracy development

Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 16-31

  Funilkul, Suree ^a   Chutimaskul, Wichian ^a  

^a KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Communication technologies; Democracy; Modelling; Quality; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349472789     PISSN: 17506166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17506160910940713     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z., Secher, C. and Medaglia, R. (2007), Costs of e-participation: the management challenges, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 29-43.
2. Black, A. and Noble, P. (2001), E-Democracy around the World: A Survey for the Bertlesmann Foundation, pp. 1-88, Phil Noble and Associate, Charleston, SC.
3. Blumler, J.G. and Coleman, S. (2001), Realizing Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace, pp. 1-26, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
4. Bozinis, A.I. and Iakovou, E. (2005), Electronic democratic governance: problems, challenges, and best practices, Journal of Information Technology Impact, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 73-80.
5. Bureau of International Information Programs (2007), Principle of democracy, available at: www.guangzhou.usconsulate.gov/uploads/images/epbwa8KlPc2j20PlUj4j3A/Prin ciples_of_Democracy.doc (accessed July 30).
6. Clift, S. (2004), E-Democracy, E-Governance, and Public Net-work, pp. 1-7, Open-Source-Jahrbuch, Berlin.
7. Coleman, S. (2007), From the Ground Up: An Evaluation of Community Focused Approaches to E-Democracy, pp. 1-44, The Local e-Democracy National Project, Bristol City Council, Bristol.
8. COSO (2006), COSO, The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, available at: www.coso.org/ (accessed July 13, 2007).
9. Davis, F.D. (1989), Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No.3, pp. 319-40.
10. Delakorda, S. (2006), Models of democracy and the design of Slovenian political party web sites, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Vol. 223/2006, pp. 279-95.
11. Funilkul, S., Soontreerutana, W., Orthofer, G., Gieber, H. and Traunmüller, R. (2006), A model linking criteria for best practice concerning eDemocracy, February 16-18, Proceedings of the 9th International Legal Informatics Symposium (IRIS), Vienna, Austria, pp. 157-64.
12. Gershman, C. and Allen, M. (2006), The assault on democracy assistance, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 17, No.2, pp. 36-51.
13. HM Government (2002), In the Service of Democracy: A Consultation Paper on a Policy for Electronic Democracy, pp. 1-59, Office of the E-Envoy, London.
14. International IDEA (1995), available at: www.idea.int/vt/ (accessed March 29, 2007), Voter Turnout.
15. (The) Inter-Parliamentary Council (1997), Universal declaration on democracy, available at: www.ipu.org/cnl-e/161-dem.htm (accessed July 30, 2007).
16. ISO (2007), International Standard Organization, available at: www.iso.com (accessed September 20).
17. IT Governance Institute (2007), COBIT 4.1, pp. 1-213, IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows, IL.
18. Jones, S., Hackney, R. and Irani, Z. (2007), Towards e-government transformation: conceptualising 'citizen engagement' a research note, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 1, No.2, pp. 145-52.
19. Korakas, C. (2008), E-democracy: opportunities and problems, Access2Democracy Foundation, available at: www.access2democracy.org (accessed January 31).
20. Local E-Democracy National Project (2005), What Works: Key Lessons from Recent Literature, pp. 1-28, MORI Market Dynamics, Bristol City Council, Bristol.
21. Local E-Democracy National Project (2006), Deeper and Wider Community Engagement: e-Democracy and its Benefits for Local Authorities, Councilors, and Communities, pp. 1-38, NorthLincsNet, Improvement and Development Agency, London.
22. Office of Government Commerce (2006), OGC-PRINCE2 Maturity Model (P2MM) Version 1.0, pp. 1-24, OGC, London.
23. Office of Government Commerce (2007), available at: www.ogc.gov.uk/methods_prince_2.asp (accessed July 13), OGC - PRINCE2.
24. Project Routemap (2006), Project planning route map, available at: www.e-democracy.gov.uk/toolkit/routemap.htm (accessed January 29).
25. Riley, T.B. (2002), E-Government 2002: Part II Applications of E-Government in Five Countries and A Review of Electronic Democracy, pp. 19-36, The Commonwealth Centre for Electronic Governance, London.
26. Sen, A. (1999), Democracy as a universal value, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 10, No.3, pp. 3-17.
27. Sevanto, J. (1999), Multimedia messaging service for GPRS and UMTS, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 1422-6.
28. Software Engineering Institute (2006), CMMI for Development Version1.2, pp. 1-573, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
29. Timisi, N. (2007), Digitalization, democracy, and the parliamentary libraries, available at: www.tbmm.gov.tr/aplap/turkey2002/APLAP-Timisi.doc (accessed March 1, 2007).
30. UNESCO (1997), Universal Declaration on Democracy, pp. 1-4, Culture of Peace Programme, Paris.
31. United Nations (2005), UN Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005: From e-Government to e-Inclusion, pp. 1-270, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Public Administration and Development Management, New York, NY.
32. United Nation Information Services Vienna (2001), Secretary-general outlines principles for UN efforts in promoting democracy in message to community of democracies seminar, available at: www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/pressrels/2001/sgsm7723.html (accessed January 13, 2008).
33. van der Graft, P. and Svensson, J. (2006), Explaining eDemocracy development: a quantitative empirical study, Information Polity: An International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age, Vol. 11, No.2, pp. 123-34.
34. W3C (2007), About W3C, World Wide Web Consortium, available at: www.w3.org/Consortium/ (accessed September 20).
35. Wangpipatwong, S. and Chutimaskul, W. (2005), eGovernment web quality assessment: a citizen-centric approach, August 15-17, Proceedings of the Ninth IASTED International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (IMSA2005), Honolulu, HI, USA, pp. 65-8.
36. Whyte, A., Renton, A. and Macintosh, A. (2005), eDemocracy from the Top Down: An Evaluation of eDemocracy Activities Initiated by Councils and Government, pp. 1-98, Bristol City Council for The Local eDemocracy National Project, Bristol.
37. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future, p. 43, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
38. Zarei, M.H. (2000), Democratic process and accountability in public administration, Asian Review of Public Administration, Vol. 12, No.2, pp. 40-55.