Comparison of retinal nerve fibre layer measurements from time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography systems

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 562-566

  Johnson, Davin E ^a   El Defrawy, Sherif R ^a   Almeida, David R P ^a   Campbell, Robert J ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Optical coherence; Retinal nerve fibre layer (not MeSH); Tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NERVE FIBER; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTIC DISK; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA; RETINA NERVE FIBER LAYER; SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; TIME DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 70349464834     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3129/i09-106     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chang R, Budenz DL. New developments in optical coherence tomography for glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:127-135 (Pubitemid 351322815)
2. Kim TW, Park UC, Park KH, Kim DM. Ability of Stratus OCT to identify localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects in patients with normal standard automated perimetry results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1635-1641
3. Lalezary M, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, et al. Baseline optical coherence tomography predicts the development of glaucomatous change in glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:576-582 (Pubitemid 44442064)
4. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, McSoley J, Katz J. Sensitivity and specificity of the StratusOCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005;112:3-9. (Pubitemid 40075311)
5. Hood DC, Harizman N, Kanadani FN, et al. Retinal nerve fibre thickness measured with optical coherence tomography accurately detects confirmed glaucomatous damage. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:905-907 (Pubitemid 47013102)
6. Hangai M, Ojima Y, Gotoh N, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of macular holes with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2007;114:763-773 (Pubitemid 46483687)
7. Ojima Y, Hangai M, Sasahara M, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the foveal photoreceptor layer in central serous chorioretinopathy using high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2007;114:2197-2207 (Pubitemid 350181101)
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
9. Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, Chew EY, Wong WT. Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4290-4296
10. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparison of macular thickness measurements between time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4893-4897
11. Campbell RJ, Coupland SG, Buhrmann RR, Kertes PJ. Effect of eccentric and inconsistent fixation on retinal optical coherence tomography measures. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:624-627
12. Cheung CY, Yiu CK, Weinreb RN, et al. Effects of scan circle displacement in optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement: a RNFL modelling study. Eye 2008 Sept 19; [Epub ahead of print].