Are the L1 and L2 word reading processes affected more by writing system or instruction?

Second Language Writing Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 215-237

  Scholfield, Phil ^a   Chwo, Gloria Shu Mei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349462707     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Baluch, B. and Besner, D. (1991) Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17, 644-52.
2. Beringer, J. (1996) Experimental RunTime System. Frankfurt: BeriSoft Corporation.
3. Chabat, R., Zehr, H., Prinzo, O. and Petros, T. (1984) The speed of word recognition subprocesses and reading achievement in college students. Reading Research Quarterly 19, 147-61.
4. Chall, J. (1983) Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
5. Chen, C. and Juola, J. (1982) Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English. Memory and Cognition 10, 216-24.
6. Coltheart, M. (1978) Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (ed.) Strategies of Information Processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
7. Frost, R., Katz, L. and Bentin, S. (1987) Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13, 104-15.
8. Goodman, K. (1967) Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist 6, 126-35.
9. Hsia, S. (1995) How beginning reading theories account for second language reading: Implications for teaching word recognition and reading and for pedagogical research in second language reading. Singapore Book World: Asian Reading Congress 1995. National Book Development Council of Singapore in Association with Society for Reading and Literacy 25, 117-32.
10. Huang, H. and Hanley, J. (1995) Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese. Cognition 54, 73-98.
11. Koda, K. (1992) The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. The Modern Language Journal76, 502-12.
12. Kučera, H. and Francis, W. (1967) Computational Analysis of Present Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
13. LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S.J. (1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6, 293-323.
14. Lee, S., Stigler, J. and Stevenson, H. (1986) Beginning reading in Chinese. In B. Foorman and A. Siegel (eds) Acquisition of Reading Skills (pp. 123-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Liu, I.-M., Chuang, C.-J. and Wang S.-C. (1975) Frequency Count of 40,000 Chinese Words (in Chinese). Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Books Company.
16. Perfetti, C. and Zhang, S. (1995) Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21, 24-33.
17. Pitman, J. and St. John, J. (1969) Alphabets and Reading: The Initial Teaching Alphabet. London: Pitman.
18. Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. and Ding, B. (1986) The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition 24, 31-45.
19. Rumelhart, D. (1977) Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (ed.) Attention and Performance VI (pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Seidenberg, M. (1985) The time course of phonological activation in two writing systems. Cognition 19, 1-30.
21. Seidenberg, M. and McClelland, J. (1989) A distributed development model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96, 523-68.
22. Treiman, R., Baron, J. and Luk, K. (1981) Speech recoding in silent reading: A comparison of Chinese and English. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9, 116-25.
23. Tzeng, O., Hung, D. and Wang, D. (1977) Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3, 621-30.
24. Van Orden, G.and Goldinger, S. (1994)The interdependence of formand function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 1269-91.