Level of detail in UML models and its impact on model comprehension: A controlled experiment

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1670-1685

  Nugroho, Ariadi ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Experiment; Level of detail; Model quality; UML model

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; EXPERIMENT CONFIRM; GRADUATE STUDENTS; LEVEL OF DETAIL; LIBRARY SYSTEMS; LITTLE RESEARCH; MODEL QUALITY; PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE PROJECT; UML MODEL; UML MODELING;

COMPUTER CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 70349462678     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lange C.F.J., Chaudron M.R.V., and Muskens J. In practice: UML software architecture and design description. IEEE Software 23 2 (2006) 40-46
2. Nugroho A., and Chaudron M.R.V. Managing the quality of UML models in practice. In: Rech J., and Bunse C. (Eds). Model-Driven Software Development: Integrating Quality Assurance, Information Science Reference (2008), IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA 1-36 (Chapter 1)
3. Nugroho A., and Chaudron M.R.V. A survey into the rigor of UML use and its perceived impact on quality and productivity. ESEM'08: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (2008), ACM, New York, NY, USA 90-99
4. Object Management Group, The Unified Modeling Language. http://www.uml.org.
5. Wong K., and Sun D. On evaluating the layout of UML class diagrams for program comprehension. IWPC'05: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (2005), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA 317-326
6. Purchase H.C., Colpoys L., McGill M., Carrington D., and Britton C. UML class diagram syntax: an empirical study of comprehension. APVis'01: Proceedings of the 2001 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualisation (2001), Australian Computer Society Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia 113-120
7. Wohlin C., Runeson P., Höst M., Ohlsson M.C., Regnell B., and Wesslén A. Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers., Norwell, MA, USA
8. Otero M.C., and Dolado J. Evaluation of the comprehension of the dynamic modeling in UML. Information and Software Technology 46 1 (2004) 35-53
9. Glezer C., Last M., Nachmany E., and Shoval P. Quality and comprehension of UML interaction diagrams - an experimental comparison. Information and Software Technology 47 10 (2005) 675-692
10. Torchiano M. Empirical assessment of UML static object diagrams. International Workshop on Program Comprehension (2004) 226-230
11. Briand L.C., Labiche Y., Penta M.D., and Yan-Bondoc H.D. An experimental investigation of formality in UML-based development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 10 (2005) 833-849
12. Staron M., Kuzniarz L., and Wohlin C. Empirical assessment of using stereotypes to improve comprehension of UML models: a set of experiments. Journal of Systems and Software 79 5 (2006) 727-742
13. F. Ricca, M.D. Penta, M. Torchiano, P. Tonella, M. Ceccato, The role of experience and ability in comprehension tasks supported by UML stereotypes, in: ICSE'07: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2007, pp. 375-384.
14. Genero M., Cruz-Lemus J.A., Caivano D., Abrahao S., Insfran E., and Carsi{dotless}́ J.A. Assessing the influence of stereotypes on the comprehension of UML sequence diagrams: a controlled experiment. MoDELS'08: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (2008), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 280-294
15. J. Cruz-Lemus, M. Genero, S. Morasca, M. Piattini, Assessing the understandability of UML statechart diagrams with composite states - a family of empirical studies, Empirical Software Engineering, in press. Available from
16. Genero M., Manso E., Visaggio A., Canfora G., and Piattini M. Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability. Empirical Software Engineering 12 5 (2007) 517-549
17. Arisholm E., Briand L.C., Hove S.E., and Labiche Y. The impact of UML documentation on software maintenance: an experimental evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 32 6 (2006) 365-381
18. A. Nugroho, Experiment Materials. .
19. Briand L., and Labiche Y. A UML-based approach to system testing. Software and Systems Modeling 1 1 (2002) 10-42
20. Dobing B., and Parsons J. How UML is used. Communications of the ACM 49 5 (2006) 109-113
21. Oppenheim A.N. Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement (1996), Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
22. SPSS Statistical Analysis Tool. .
23. Krus D.J., and Krus P.H. Lost: Mccall's T scores: Why?. Educational and Psychological Measurement 37 1 (1977) 257-261
24. A. Nugroho, B. Flaton, M.R.V. Chaudron, Empirical analysis of the relation between level of detail in UML models and defect density, in: Czarnecki (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS), LNCS, vol. 5301, Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 600-614.