Risks, Advantages, and Complications of Intercostal vs Subcostal Approach for Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Urology

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 751-755

  Lang, Erich ^a   Thomas, Raju ^b   Davis, Ronald ^b   Colon, Ivan ^a   Allaf, Mohamad ^c   Hanano, Amer ^a   Kagen, Alexander ^a   Sethi, Erum ^a   Emery, Kirsten ^a   Rudman, Ernest ^a   Myers, Leann ^b  

^a SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBESITY; OPERATION DURATION; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAGHORN STONE; SURGICAL APPROACH; URETER STONE;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; RISK; URETERAL CALCULI; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349437311     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.087     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Carlson K.J., Dretler S.P., Roth R.A., et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for urinary calculi: comparison of immediate and long-term effects. J Stone Dis 5 (1993) 8-18
2. Hentschel H., Janitzky V., and Weirich T. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy - always effective and free of complications?. Aktuelle Urol 38 (2007) 232-236
3. Monga M. Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patients. Int Braz J Urol 33 (2007) 714-715
4. Kang D.E., Maloney M.M., Haleblian G.E., et al. Effect of medical management on recurrent stone formation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 177 (2007) 1785-1788
5. Osman M.M., Alfano Y., Kamp S., et al. 5 Year follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 47 (2005) 860-864
6. Stening S.G., and Bourne S. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. J Endourol 4 (1998) 359-362
7. Duvdevani M., Razvi H., Sofer M., et al. Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1585 procedures in 1338 consecutive patients. J Endourol 8 (2007) 824-829
8. Raza A., Moussa S., Smith G., et al. Upper pole puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective review of treatment, safety and efficacy. BJU Int 101 (2008) 599-602
9. Shah H.N., Hegde S.S., Shah J.N., et al. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 20 (2006) 1016-1021
10. Kurahashi T., Miyake H., Oka N., et al. Clinical outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for 2129 patients with ureteral stones. Urol Res 35 (2007) 149-153
11. Berczi C., Flasko T., Lorincz I., et al. Results of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy compared to that of ureteroscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17 (2007) 285-289
12. Smith R.D., and Patel A. Impact of flexible ureterorendoscopy in current management of nephrolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol 17 (2007) 114-119
13. Bankhead C. Ureteroscopy better for smaller lower pole stones. Urology Times 1231 (2003) 1222
14. Hopper K.D., and Yakes W.F. The posterior intercostal approach for percutaneous renal procedures: risk of puncturing the lung, spleen, and liver as determined by CT. Am J Roentgenol 154 (1990) 115-117
15. Miller N.L., Matlaga B.R., and Lingeman J.R. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol 178 (2007) 15-23
16. Mozer P., Conort P.L., Leroy A., et al. Aid to percutaneous renal access by virtual projection of the ultrasound puncture tract onto fluoroscopic images. J Endourol 21 (2007) 460-465
17. Hopper K.D., Sherman J.L., Luethke J.M., et al. The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162 (1987) 443-446
18. Sampaio F.J., Mandarim-de-Lacerda C.A., and De Arangao A.H. The collecting system of the kidney. Applied anatomy based on the analysis of 3 dimensional casts. J Urol 93 (1987) 183-185
19. Sampaio F.J., and Arangao A.H. Anatomical relationship between intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. J Urol 143 (1990) 679-681
20. Koo B.C., Burtt G., and Burgess N.A. Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index. BJU Int 6 (2004) 1296-1299
21. Steele D., and Marshal V. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position, a neglected approach. J Endourol 12 (2007) 1433-1437
22. Radecka E., Brehmer M., Holmgren K., et al. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: supra-versus subcostal access. A retrospective study. Acta Radiol 44 (2003) 447-451
23. Lojanapiwat B., and Prasopsuk S. Upper pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches. J Endourol 20 (2006) 391-395
24. Chichakli R., Krause R., Voelzke B., et al. Incidence of perinephric hematoma after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 6 (2008) 1227-1230
25. Gupta R., Kumar A., Kapoor R., et al. Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 90 (2002) 809-813
26. Ko R., Soucy F., Denstedt J.D., et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy made easier: a practical guide, tips and tricks. BJU Int 3 (2008) 535-539