Integrating scientific knowledge into large-scale restoration programs: the CALFED Bay-Delta Program experience

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 674-683

  Taylor, Kim A ^a   Short, Anne ^b  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

CALFED; Environmental resource management; Science and decision making; Shared knowledge

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 70349425686     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alpert P., and Keller A. The ecology-policy interface. Frontiers in Ecology 1 (2003) 45-46
2. AMF (Adaptive Management Forum Scientific and Technical Panel), 2001. Lower Tuolumne River Adaptive Management Forum Report. University of California, Davis.
3. AMF, 2002. Merced River Adaptive Management Forum Report. University of California, Davis.
4. Bryson J.M., and Crosby B.C. Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World (1992), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
5. Burau, J.R., 2007. Personal communication.
6. Cash, D.W., Clark, W.C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N.M., Eckley, N., Jäger, J., 2002. Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making. Kennedy School of Government Working Papers Series RWP02-046, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.372280.
7. Christensen N.L., Bartuska A.M., Brown J.H., Carpenter S., D'Antonio C., Francis R., Franklin J.F., MacMahon J.A., Noss R.F., Parsons D.J., Peterson C.H., Turner M.G., and Woodmansee R.G. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6 3 (1996) 665-691
8. Coe-Juell L. The 15-mile reach: let the fish tell us. In: Brunner R.D., Steelman T.A., Coe-Juell L., Cromley C.M., Edwards C.M., and Tucker D.W. (Eds). Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making (2005), Columbia University Press, New York 47-90
9. Connick S., and Innes J.E. Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: applying complexity thinking to evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 2 (2003) 177-197
10. Creel, C., 2004. Operations in relation to water quality standards. Presentation to the CALFED Independent Science Board, September 21, 2004, Sacramento, CA.
11. DWR (California Department of Water Resources), 1994. Comprehensive Needs Assessment for Chinook Salmon Habitat Improvement Projects in the San Joaquin River Basin. Sacramento, CA.
12. DWR, 2004. Tuolumne River La Grange Gravel Addition Project, Phase II, Geomorphic Monitoring Report. Sacramento, CA.
13. Forester J. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (1999), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge
14. Gieryn T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48 (1983) 781-795
15. Graff, T.J., Johnson, S., 1998. Letter to Richard Daniel, CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program. Sacramento, CA.
16. Gray B. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems (1989), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
17. Guston D.H. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 4 (2001) 399-408
18. Hays S.P. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement 1890-1920 (1999), University of Chicago, Chicago
19. Innes J.E., and Booher D.E. Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice 5 4 (2004) 419-436
20. Innes, J.E., Connick, S., Kaplan, L., Booher, D.E., 2006. Collaborative Governance in the CALFED Program: Adaptive Policymaking for California Water. Working Paper 2006-01. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley and Center for Collaborative Policy Studies, California State University Sacramento.
21. Jacobs K.L., Luoma S.N., and Taylor K.A. CALFED: an experiment in science and decision making. Environment 45 1 (2003) 30-34
22. Jäger J. The governance of science for sustainability. In: Adger W.N., and Jordan A. (Eds). Governing Sustainability (2009), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 142-158
23. Jasanoff S. Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science 17 (1987) 195-230
24. Karl H.A., Susskind L.E., and Wallace K.H. A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environment 49 1 (2007) 20-34
25. Kimmerer, W.J., Brown, R.L, 2003. Summary of the Annual Delta Smelt Technical Workshop, Santa Cruz, CA, August 18-19, 2003. CALFED Science Program. Sacramento, CA.
26. Lichatowich, J., Anderson, J., Cowan, J., Kneib, R., Monismith, S., Rose, K., Smith, P., Solow, A., Thompson, B., 2007. Letter by the Environmental Water Account Review Panel to the CALFED Lead Scientist Transmitting Review Comments on the Resource Agencies' Action Matrix for 2007, January 2, 2007, Sacramento, CA.
27. McBain and Trush, 2000. Habitat Restoration Plan for the Lower Tuolumne River Corridor. Report for the Tuolumne River Technical Advisory Committee, Arcata, CA.
28. McBain and Trush and Stillwater Sciences, 2006. Tuolumne River Restoration Project Monitoring: Special Run Pools 9/10 and Gravel Mining Reach 7/1, Arcata, CA.
29. Nawi, D., Brandt, A.W., 2002. CalFed Bay-Delta Program: from conflict to collaboration. Unpublished manuscript on file with the Duke Law Journal.
30. Nobriga M., and Sommer T. Delta Smelt Management Brief (2005), California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA
31. Oltmann, R., 1998. Measured Flow and Tracer-Dye Data Showing the Anthropogenic Effects on the Hydrodynamics of south Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, Spring 1996 and 1997. United States Geological Survey Open File Report 98-285.
32. Panel to Review the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative, National Research Council (NRC), 2003. Science and the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration: An Assessment of the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
33. Poff N.L., Allan D., Palmer M.A., Hart D., Richter B.D., Arthington A.H., Rogers K.H., Meyer J.L., and Stanford J.A. River flows and water wars: emerging science for environmental decision making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1 6 (2003) 298-306
34. Rieke E.A. The Bay-Delta Accord: a stride toward sustainability. University of Colorado Law Review 67 (1996) 341-369
35. Schön D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1983), Basic Books, New York
36. Star S.L., and Griesemer J.R. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals at Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19 3 (1989) 387-420
37. Taylor, K.A., 1995. Redefining Environmental Management Problems: The Shift in Dredging Management in San Francisco Bay 1967-1994. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
38. TID (Turlock Irrigation District) and MID (Modesto Irrigation District), 2005. Ten Year Summary Report. Modesto, CA.
39. USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service), 1993. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of threatened status for the delta smelt. Federal Register 58, 2854-12863.
40. Water Education Foundation Aquafornia Blog. Why the Delta matters to every Californian. September 3, 2007. http://aquafornia.com/archives/588.
41. White, J., Fleming, K., 2006. Potential Actions to Reduce the Effects of Water Management on Delta Smelt Reproduction, Growth and Survival Intended to Increase Delta Smelt Abundance. CALFED Delta Smelt Working Group. Sacramento, CA.
42. Wondolleck J.M., and Yaffee S.L. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons From Innovation in Natural Resource Management (2000), Island Press, Washington, DC