Can we increase haddock yield within the constraints of the Magnuson-Stevens Act?

Fisheries Research

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 240-247

  Dankel, Dorothy J ^a,b,c   Jacobson, Nikki ^c   Georgianna, Dan ^d   Cadrin, Steven X ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c NOAA/UMass Cooperative Marine Education and Research Program   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Fisheries policy options; Georges Bank; Groundfish; Haddock; Multi species; Ruhle trawl; Separator trawl; Stakeholder views; Technological interactions

Indexed keywords

LIMANDA FERRUGINEA; MELANOGRAMMUS; PLEURONECTOIDEI;

EID: 70349416396     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anonymous. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (2006), Department of Commerce, Washington, DC
2. Anonymous, 2007. Resources and relations with stakeholders, interinstitutional relations and dialogue with the sector, programming and evaluation. In: Fifth RACs Coordination Meeting, Brussels. European Commission, Directorate General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs, December 11, 2007.
3. Beutel, D., Skrobe, L., Castro, K., Philip Ruhle, S., O'Grady, J., Knight, J., Philip Ruhle, J., 2006. Bycatch Reduction in the Directed Haddock Bottom Trawl Fishery. University of Rhode Island Fisheries Center Technical Report: 01-06.
4. Beutel D., Skrobe L., Castro K., Ruhle Sr. P., Ruhle Jr. P., O'Grady J., and Knight J. Bycatch reduction in the Northeast USA directed haddock bottom trawl fishery. Fisheries Research 94 (2008) 190-198
5. In: Boreman J., Nakashima B.S., Wilson J.A., and Kendall R.L. (Eds). Northwest Atlantic Groundfish: Perspectives on a Fishery Collapse (1997), American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland
6. Caddy J.F., and Seijo J.C. This is more difficult than we thought! The responsibility of scientists, managers and stakeholders to mitigate the unsustainability of marine fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360 (2005) 59-75
7. Charles A.T. Sustainable Fishery Systems (2001), Blackwell Science Ltd
8. Dankel D.J., Skagen D.W., and Ulltang Ø. Fisheries management in practice: a review of 13 commercially-important fish stocks. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 18 (2008) 201-233
9. Hilborn R. Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Marine Policy 31 (2007) 153-158
10. ICES, 2006. Report of the Study Group on Management Strategies (SGMAS), 157 pp.
11. ICES, 2007. Report of the Study Group on Management Strategies (SGMAS). ICES SGMAS Report 2007.
12. Jacobson N., and Cadrin S. Projecting Equilibrium, Mixed-species Yield of New England Groundfish (2008), ICES ASC, Halifax, Canada
13. Jentoft S., and McCay B. User participation in fisheries management-lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy 19 (1995) 227-246
14. Jin, D., 2008. Development of Commercial Fishing Cost Models; Project Report. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Marine Policy Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
15. Kronbak L.G., Nielsen J.R., Jørgensen O.A., and Vestergaard N. Bio-economic evaluation of implementing trawl fishing gear with different selectivity. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009) 3665-3674
16. Martins D., Cadrin S., Rothschild B., and Lane R. Cooperative Industry-Based At-Sea Experiment to Test the Performance of a Haddock-Separator Trawl in Closed Area I-Georges Bank (2006), School for Marine Science and Technology University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth p. 32
17. Murawski S.A. Mixed-species yield-per-recruit analyses accounting for technological interactions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41 (1984) 897-916
18. NEFSC, 2008. Assessment of 19 Northeast Groundfish Stocks through 2007: Report of the 3rd Groundfish Assessment Review Meeting (GARM III). US Dep Commer, NOAA Fisheries, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, p. 884 + xvii.
19. NOAA, 2000. Days-At-Sea (DAS) Allocation and Usage. Fishery Analysis and Monitoring Section. http://www.nero.noaa.gov/ro/fso/muldas00b.pdf.
20. Paramor, O.A.L., Hatchard, J.L., Mikalsen, K.H., Gray, T.S., Scott, C.L., Frid, C.L.J., 2005. Involving fishers in the development of a fisheries ecosystem plan. ICES CM.
21. Rijsberman, F., 1999. Conflict Management and Consensus Building for Integrated Coastal Management in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Bank, I.-A.D.s (Ed.), Washington, DC, p. 63.
22. Sissenwine, M., Symes, D., 2007. Relections on the Common Fisheries Policy. Report to the General Directorate for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs of the European Commission.
23. Utne I.B. Systems engineering principles in fisheries management. Marine Policy 30 (2006) 624-634