Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 280, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 357-362

  Uyar, Yildiz ^a,c   Erbay, Gurcan ^b   Demir, Bilge Cetinkaya ^a   Baytur, Yesim ^a  

^a CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Dr E Hayri Ustundag Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Birth weight; Bishop score; Body mass index; Cervical length; Labor induction

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BISHOP SCORE; BODY MASS; CERVICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; PARITY; RISK FACTOR; ROC CURVE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

BODY MASS INDEX; CERVICAL RIPENING; CERVIX UTERI; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR, INDUCED; ORGAN SIZE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 70349407881     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0915-x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. GK Pandis AT Papageorghiou VG Ramanathan MO Thompson KH Nicolaides 2001 Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18 623 628 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x 11844202 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00580.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387hs1WmsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34063063)
2. Crowley P (2003) Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. The Cochrane Library, issue 2. http://www. update-software.com. Accessed 14 Dec 2003
3. A Fuentes M Williams 1995 Cervical assessment Clin Obstet Gynecol 38 2 224 231 10.1097/00003081-199506000-00005 7554590 10.1097/00003081-199506000- 00005 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FktVSisw%3D%3D
4. EH Bishop 1964 Pelvic scoring for elective induction Obstet Gynecol 24 266 268 14199536 1:STN:280:DyaF2M%2Fgtl2isg%3D%3D
5. G Sadoul T Beuret D Lewin 1981 The different elements constituting the Bishop score in the induction of labour with epidural analgesia (author's transl) J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 10 3 269 273 1:STN:280: DyaL3M3msFehsQ%3D%3D
6. GM Jackson J Ludmir TJ Bader 1992 The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length Obstet Gynecol 79 2 214 218 1731287 1:STN:280:DyaK387hsFagug%3D%3D
7. MJ Hughey TW McElin CC Bird 1976 An evaluation of preinduction scoring systems Obstet Gynecol 48 6 635 641 995333 1:STN:280:DyaE2s%2Fls1OhsQ%3D%3D
8. K Dhall SC Mittal A Kumar 1987 Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 27 4 309 311 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x 3453668 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3otVOiuw%3D%3D
9. KH Park 2007 Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women J Korean Med Sci 22 4 722 727 17728517 10.3346/jkms.2007. 22.4.722
10. AM Gómez Laencina FG Sánchez JH Gimenez MS Martínez JA Valverde Martínez VM Vizcaíno 2007 Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86 7 799 804 10.1080/00016340701409858 17611824 10.1080/00016340701409858 (Pubitemid 47035832)
11. MR Elghorori I Hassan W Dartey E Abdel-Aziz M Bradley 2006 Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour J Obstet Gynaecol 26 6 521 526 10.1080/01443610600797459 17000497 10.1080/01443610600797459 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rntFGlsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44454458)
12. R Gabriel T Darnaud F Chalot N Gonzalez F Leymarie C Quereux 2002 Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19 3 254 257 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x 11896946 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387ms1SltA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34304571)
13. V Ware BD Raynor 2000 Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 5 1030 1032 10.1067/mob.2000.105399 10819818 10.1067/mob.2000.105399 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3c3nvFKquw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30353271)
14. WJ Watson D Stevens S Welter D Day 1996 Factors predicting successful labor induction Obstet Gynecol 88 6 990 992 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00321-3 8942840 10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00321-3 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FpvVaquw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26391501)
15. F Boozarjomehri I Timor-Tritsch CR Chao HE Fox 1994 Transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix before labor: presence of cervical wedging is associated with shorter duration of induced labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 171 4 1081 1087 7943075 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FivFKjug%3D%3D
16. RK Edwards DS Richards 2000 Preinduction cervical assessment Clin Obstet Gynecol 43 3 440 446 10.1097/00003081-200009000-00004 10949748 10.1097/00003081-200009000-00004 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7itFGksQ%3D%3D
17. JM Crane 2006 Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis Clin Obstet Gynecol 49 3 573 584 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00017 16885664 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00017 (Pubitemid 44181430)
18. RCOG 5 October 2006 press releases. http://www.rcog.org.uk/index.asp? PageID=97&PressReleaseID=126
19. NJ Sebire M Jolly JP Harris J Wadsworth M Joffe RW Beard L Regan S Robinson 2001 Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25 8 1175 1182 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670 11477502 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2FislGnsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32721540)
20. B Abrams J Parker 1988 Overweight and pregnancy complications Int J Obes 12 293 303 3058615 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2Fms1Skug%3D%3D
21. SM Rane GK Pandis RR Guirgis B Higgins KH Nicolaides 2003 Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22 1 40 44 10.1002/uog.165 12858301 10.1002/uog.165 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3szivVKksA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36886447)
22. SM Rane RR Guirgis B Higgins KH Nicolaides 2004 The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24 5 538 549 10.1002/uog.1100 15386612 10.1002/uog.1100 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2crgt1Sisg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39424678)
23. L Rovas P Sladkevicius E Strobel L Valentin 2005 Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the cervix for the prediction of successful induction of labor with prostaglandin in prolonged pregnancy J Ultrasound Med 24 7 933 939 15972707
24. PC Tan N Vallikkannu S Suguna KF Quek J Hassan 2007 Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29 5 568 573 10.1002/uog.4018 17444553 10.1002/uog.4018 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s3kvFyluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46830411)
25. R Gonen S Degani A Ron 1998 Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score Eur J Ultrasound 7 3 183 187 10.1016/S0929-8266(98)00042-1 9700213 10.1016/S0929-8266(98)00042-1 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FgvFajtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28419445)
26. S Paterson-Brown NM Fisk DK Edmonds CH Rodeck 1991 Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop's score and transvaginal ultrasound Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 40 1 17 23 1855604 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90039-N 1:STN:280:DyaK3MzgvFOqtg%3D%3D
27. SM Rane RR Guirgis B Higgins KH Nicolaides 2003 Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22 1 45 48 10.1002/uog.166 12858302 10.1002/uog.166 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szivVKksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36886448)
28. TK Young B Woodmansee 2002 Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a large private practice: the importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain Am J Obstet Gynecol 187 2 312 318 10.1067/mob.2002.126200 12193918 10.1067/mob.2002.126200 (Pubitemid 34925562)
29. JM Baeten EA Bukusi M Lambe 2001 Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women Am J Public Health 91 3 436 440 10.2105/AJPH.91.3.436 11236410 10.2105/AJPH.91.3.436 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7otlCrsA%3D%3D
30. R Cnattingius S Cnattingius FC Notzon 1998 Obstacles to reducing cesarean rates in a low-cesarean setting: the effect of maternal age, height, and weight Obstet Gynecol 92 4 Pt 1 501 506 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00244-0 9764619 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00244-0 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjsFKnug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28449592)
31. PS Kaiser RS Kirby 2001 Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population Obstet Gynecol 97 1 39 43 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01078-4 11152904 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01078-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7is1Sluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32057153)
32. E Peregrine P O'Brien R Omar E Jauniaux 2006 Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor Obstet Gynecol 107 2 Pt 1 227 233 16449105
33. R Cnattingius B Höglund H Kieler 2005 Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84 5 456 462 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00620.x 15842210 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005. 00620.x (Pubitemid 40663446)
34. TS Usha Kiran S Hemmadi J Bethel J Evans 2005 Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index BJOG 112 6 768 772 10.1111/j.1471-0528. 2004.00546.x 15924535 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00546.x 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2M3otVWrsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40852847)
35. G Braems I Norhausen 2007 Induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical reasons: determining explanatory variables of the induction to delivery time interval for vaginal deliveries and caesarean section Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 135 2 164 169 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.004 17240033 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.004 (Pubitemid 350181250)
36. FS Nuthalapaty DJ Rouse J Owen 2004 The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction Obstet Gynecol 103 3 452 456 14990405
37. W Kabiru BD Raynor 2004 Obstetric outcomes associated with increase in BMI category during pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 3 928 932 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.051 15467566 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.051 (Pubitemid 39298135)