Memory and executive function predict mobility rehabilitation outcome after lower-limb amputation

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 31, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1083-1091

  O'Neill, Brian F ^a,b   Evans, Jonathan J ^c  

^a West of Scotland Mobility and Rehabilitation Centre   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amputation; Assessment; Attention; Cognition; Memory; Rehabilitation outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; COMORBIDITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EMOTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEG AMPUTATION; LOCOMOTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PATIENT MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF REPORT; SPEECH; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL MEMORY; AMPUTATION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DISABLED PERSON; LEG; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; WALKING;

AGED; AMPUTATION; AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEG; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; WALKING;

EID: 70349396883     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280802509579     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Sockalingam S, Condie ME, Treweek SP. Post-discharge functional measure for lower limb amputees. London: Rehabilitation and Medical Research Trust; 1998.
2. Darroch J, Scott H. Benchmarking 2001 primary lower limb amputees - prosthetic service group report. Dundee: Rehabilitation Technology Information Service; 2004.
3. Larner S, Van Ross E, Hale C. Do psychological measures predict the ability of lower limb amputees to learn to use a prosthesis? Clin Rehabil 2003;17:493-498.
4. Cargil J, Condie ME. A survey of the lower limb amputee population in Scotland, 2002. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde; 2004.
5. Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H. Predictive factors of functional ability after lower-limb amputation. Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae 1991;80:36-39.
6. Fletcher D, Andrews K, Butters M, Jacobsen S, Rowland C, Hallet J. Rehabilitation of the geriatric vascular amputee patient: a population - based study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:776-779.
7. Davies B, Datta D. Mobility outcome after unilateral lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003;27:186-190.
8. Greive AC, Lankhorst GJ. Functional outcome of lower-limb amputees: a prospective descriptive study in a general hospital. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996;20:79-87.
9. Melker RA De, Touw-Otten F, Jacobs HM, Luttik A. [De waarde van de 'sickness impact profile' als uitkomstmeting] Ned Tidjdschr Geneeskd 1990;134:946-948.
10. Munin M, Guzman M, Boninger M, Fitzgerald S, Penrod L, Singh J. Predictive factors for successful early prosthetic ambulation among lower limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:379-384.
11. Chin T, Sawamura S, Fujita H, Ojima I, Oyabu H, Nagakura Y, Otsuka, Nakagawa. %VO2max as an indicator of prosthetic rehabilitation outcome after dysvascular amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;26:44-49.
12. George JD. Nonexercise VO2max estimation for physically active college students. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:415.
13. Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ. Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE, editors. Handbook of Psychology and Health: Social Psychological Aspects of Health, Vol.4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984. pp 219-252.
14. Barnfield K. Cognition as a predictor or rehabilitation outcome in older amputees. Diss Abs Int: Sec B: Sci Eng 1997;57(10-B):6555
15. Hanspal R, Fisher K. Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor function and rehabilitation of elderly people with prostheses. BMJ 1997;302:940.
16. Pattie A, Gilleard V. Manual of the clifton assessment procedures for the elderly (CAPE). London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1979.
17. Hanspal R, Fisher K. Prediction of achieved mobility in prosthetic rehabilitation of the elderly using cognitive and psychomotor assessment. Int J Rehabil Res 1997;20:315-318.
18. Dodds C, Allison J. Postoperative cognitive deficits in the elderly surgical patient. Br J Anaesth 1998;81:449-462.
19. Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, De Vries J, Goeken LN, Eisma WH. Physical, mental and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:803-811.
20. Kendrick DC, Watts G. Kendrick assessment scales of cognitive ageing. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1999.
21. Kilander L, Nyman H, Boberg M, Lithell H. The association between low diastolic blood pressure in middle age and cognitive function in old age. A population based study. Age Ageing 2000;29:243-248.
22. Skilbeck C. The neuropsychology of vascular disorders. In: Halligan P, Kischka U, Marshall JC, editors. Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
23. Wechsler D. The wechsler adult intelligence scale, 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
24. Wechsler D. The wechsler memory scale, 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
25. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela M, Lorentz L, Looi J, Wen W, Zagami. The neuropsychological profile of vascular cognitive impairment in stroke and TIA patients. Neurology 2004;62:912-919.
26. Crepeau F, Scherzer P. Predictors and indicators of work status after traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1993;3:5-35.
27. Scottish Executive Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive; 2000.
28. Randolph C. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS). London: Harcourt Assessment; 1998.
29. Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome (BADS). London: Harcourt Assessment; 1996.
30. Benton AL, Hamsher K. Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: University of Iowa; 1976.
31. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
32. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural inattention test (BIT). London: Harcourt Assessmentk; 1987.
33. Rey A. L'Examen Clinique en Psychologie. Paris: Press Universitaire de France; 1964.
34. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361-370.
35. Ability one 9-hole peg test. Kirkby-in-Ashfield. UK: Ability One; 1993.
36. Mathuranath PS, Nestor P, Berrios GE, Rakowicz W, Hodges JR. A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2000;55:1613-1620.
37. Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise MC, Lepage Y. The locomotor capabilities index: content validity. J Rehabil Outcome Measures 1998;2:40-46.
38. Ryall NH, Eyres SB, Neumann VC, Bhakta BB, Tennant A. The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population specific measure for lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:833-844.
39. Gallagher P, McLachlan M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the trinity amputation and prosthetic experiences scale (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol 2000;45:130-154.
40. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead mobility index: a further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50-54.
41. Franchignoni F, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, Moscato TA. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the locomotor capabilities index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:743-748.
42. SPSS Inc. Statistical package for the social sciences, version 13.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2004.
43. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.
44. UCLA Department of Statistics PowerCalc. 2004. http:// calculators.stat.ucla.edu/powercalc/. Last accessed 20 October 2006.
45. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
46. Becker L. Effect size. Available at: http://web.uccs.edu/ lbecker/Psy590/es.htm#Cohen; 2000.
47. Howell DC. Multiple Regression. 2001. http://www.uvm. edu/ *dhowell/gradstat/psych341/lectures/MultipleRegression/ multreg3.html. Last accessed 15 September 2006.
48. Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Karkkainen M. Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990;14:75-79.
49. Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer J. Delis kaplan executive function system technical manual. London: Harcourt Assessment; 2001.