Argument from analogy in law, the classical tradition, and recent theories

Philosophy and Rhetoric

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 154-182

  Macagno, Fabrizio ^a   Walton, Douglas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349383870     PISSN: 00318213     EISSN: 15272079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/par.0.0034     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Adler, Jonathan. 2007. Asymmetrical analogical arguments. Argumentation 21 (1): 83-92
2. Alexy, Robert. 1989. A theory of legal argumentation: The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification. Oxford: Clarendon
3. Aristotle. 1851. On rhetoric. Trans. T. Buckley. London: Henry G. Bohn
4. -. 1939. Topica. Trans. E. S. Forster. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
5. -. 1984. Prior analytics. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 39-113. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
6. Ashley, Kevin. 1991. Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in hypo. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34 (6): 753-796
7. Brewer, Scott. 1996. Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by analogy. Harvard Law Review 109:923-1038
8. Brüninghaus, Stefanie, and Kevin Ashley. 2003a. Predicting outcomes of case-based legal arguments. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL-03), 234-242 Edinburgh: ACM Press
9. -. 2003b. A predictive role for intermediate legal concepts. In Proceedings 16th annual conference on legal knowledge and information system (Jurix-03), 153-162 Amsterdam: IOS Press
10. Burbidge, John. 1990. Within reason: A guide to non deductive reasoning. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press
11. Cederblom, Jerry, and David Paulsen. 1982. Critical reasoning. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth
12. Cicero. 1949. De Inventione, De optimo genere oraturum, Topica. Trans. H. Hubbell. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
13. Copi, Irving, and Keith Burgess-Jackson. 1992. Informal logic. New York: MacMillan
14. Goldschmidt, Victor. 1947. Le Paradigme dans la dialectique platonicienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France
15. Govier, Trudy. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11 (3): 141-152
16. Guarini, Marcello. 2004. A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 24 (2): 153-168
17. Hage, Jaap. 2005. The logic of analogy in the law. Argumentation 19 (4): 401-415
18. Hastings, Arthur. 1962. A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University
19. Johnson, Ralph, and Anthony Blair. 1983. Logical self defence. Toronto: McGraw-Hill
20. Juthe, André. 2005. Argument by analogy. Argumentation 19 (1): 1-27
21. Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog
22. Klug, Ulrich. 1951. Juristische Logik. Berlin: Springer
23. Leake, David. 1996. Case-based reasoning: Experiences, lessons, and future directions. In C ase-based reasoning: Experiences, lessons, and future directions, ed. D. B. Leake, 1-30. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
24. Lindahl, Lars. 2003. Operative and justificatory grounds in legal argumentation. Associations 7(1): 185-200
25. Little, Frederick, Leo Groarke, and Christopher Tindale. 1989. Good reasoning matters! Toronto: McClelland and Stewart
26. Manicas, Peter, and Arthur Kruger. 1968. Essentials of logic. New York: American Book Company
27. Mill, John Stuart. 1959. A system of logic. London: Longmans
28. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
29. Plato. 1990. Sophist. Trans. William Cobb. Savage, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield
30. Posner, Richard. 2006. Reasoning by analogy. Cornell Law Review 761:761-774
31. Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco. 2006. Topics: The argument generator. Università della Svizzera Italiana, www.argumentum.ch (20 May 2008)
32. Waller, Bruce. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21 (3): 199-218
33. Walton, Douglas. 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
34. -. 2006. Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
35. Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
36. Weinreb, Lloyd. 2005. Legal reason: The use of analogy in legal argument. New York: Cambridge University Press
37. Weitzenfeld, Julian. 1984. Valid reasoning by analogy. Philosophy of Science 51:137-149
38. Whately, Richard. 1859. Elements of logic. London: Longmans, Green & Co