A perspective on streaming current in silica nanofluidic channels: Poisson-Boltzmann model versus Poisson-Nernst-Planck model

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Volumn 339, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 517-520

  Chang, Chih Chang ^a   Yang, Ruey Jen ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Electrokinetics; Nanofluidics; Streaming current

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; ELECTRICAL RESISTANCES; ELECTROKINETIC FLOWS; ELECTROKINETICS; ELECTROLYTE CONCENTRATION; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; NANOFLUIDIC CHANNEL; NUMERICAL RESULTS; POISSON-BOLTZMANN; STREAMING CURRENT; THEORETICAL MODELS; WALL BOUNDARY CONDITION;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROOSMOSIS; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; POISSON EQUATION; SILICA;

NANOFLUIDICS;

SILICON DIOXIDE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ELECTRODE; MEASUREMENT; NANOFLUIDICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 70349383844     PISSN: 00219797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.07.056     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Choi Y.S., and Kim S.J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 333 (2009) 672
2. van der Heyden F.H.J., Stein D., and Dekker C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 116104
3. Probstein R.F. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics: An Introduction (1994), Wiley
4. Lyklema J. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 (2001) 5027
5. Stein D., Kruithof M., and Dekker C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 035901
6. van der Heyden F.H.J., Bonthuis D.J., Stein D., Meyer C., and Dekker C. Nano Lett. 7 (2007) 1022
7. Schoch R.B., and Renaud P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005) 253111
8. 2 / V s, respectively.
9. http://www.comsol.com.