Tree and site quality preferences of six epiphytic lichens growing on oaks in southeastern Sweden

Annales Botanici Fennici

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 496-506

  Johansson, Victor ^a,b   Bergman, Karl Olof ^a   Lättman, Håkan ^a,c   Milberg, Per ^a,b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c School of Life Sciences Södertörn University   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Calicium; Chaenotheca; Chrysothrix; Cliostomum; Evernia; Occurrence probability; Parmelia

Indexed keywords

CALICIUM; CHAENOTHECA; CHRYSOTHRIX; CLIOSTOMUM; EVERNIA; PARMELIA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 70349372512     PISSN: 00033847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5735/085.046.0602     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Armstrong, R. A. 1990: Dispersal, establishment and survival of soredia and fragments of the lichen, Hypogymnia physodes (L.) Nyl. New Phytologist 114: 239-245.
2. Arup, U. 1997: Lavar i olika miljöer. In: Arup, U., Ekman, S., Kärnefelt, I. & Mattsson, J. E. (eds.), Skyddsvärda lavar i sydvästra Sverige: 62-91. SBF-förlaget, Lund, Sweden.
3. Bakker, E. S., Olff, H., Vandenberghe, C., De Maeyer, K., Smit, R., Gleichman, J. M. & Vera, F. M. V. 2004: Ecological anachronisms in the recruitment of temperate light-demanding tree species in wooded pastures. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 571-582.
4. Barkman, J. J. 1958: Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Van Gorcum, Assen.
5. Brodo, I. M., Sharoff, S. D. & Sharoff, S. 2001: Lichens of North America. Yale University Press, New Haven.
6. Dahl, E. & Krog, H. 1973: Macrolichens of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo & Esselte Studium, Stockholm.
7. Dettki, H., Klintberg, P. & Esseen, P. A. 2000: Are epiphytic lichens in young forests limited by local dispersal? Ecoscience 7: 317-325.
8. Drobyshev, I., Niklasson, M., Linderson, H., Sonesson, K., Karlsson, M., Nilsson, M. G. & Lanner, J. 2008: Lifespan and mortality of old oaks: combining empirical and modelling approaches to support their management in Southern Sweden. Annals of Forest Science 65(article 401): 1-12.
9. Ek, T. & Johannesson, J. 2005: Multi-purpose management of oak habitats. Examples of best practice from the county of Östergötland, Sweden. Report 2005:16, County Administration Board of Östergötland.
10. Ek, T., Wadstein, M. & Johannesson, J. 1995: What is the origin of the lichen flora of old oaks? Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 89: 335-343. [In Swedish with English abstract].
11. Ek, T., Wadstein, M., Hagström, M. & Franzén, M. 2001: Rare lichens in Östergötland, Sweden 2000. Nationally and regionally red listed species. Report 2001:1, County Administration Board of Östergötland. [In Swedish with English summary].
12. Eliasson, P. & Nilsson, S. G. 2002: 'You should hate young oaks and young noblemen': The environmental history of oaks in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Sweden. Environmental History 7: 659-677.
13. Esseen, P. A., Renhorn, K. E. & Pettersson, R. B. 1996: Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: Effects of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6: 228-238.
14. Gärdenfors, U. 2005: The 2005 Red list of Swedish species. Art Databanken, Uppsala, Sweden. [In Swedish with English abstract].
15. Gu, W. D., Kuusinen, M., Konttinen, T. & Hanski, I. 2001: Spatial pattern in the occurrence of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in managed and virgin boreal forests. Ecography 24: 139-150.
16. Gustafsson, L., Fiskesjö, A., Ingelög, T., Pettersson, B. & Thor, G. 1992: Factors of importance to some lichen species of deciduous broad-leaved woods in southern Sweden. Lichenologist 24: 255-266.
17. Hallingbäck, T. 1995: Ekologisk katalog över lavar (The lichens of Sweden and their ecology). Artdatabanken, Uppsala, Sweden.
18. Hannah, L., Carr, J. L. & Lankerani, A. 1995: Human disturbance and natural habitat: a biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 128-155.
19. Hanski, I. 1999: Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, New York.
20. Harding, P. T. & Rose, F. 1986: Pasture-woodlands in lowland Britain. A review of their importance for wildlife conservation. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon.
21. Harris, G. P. 1971: The ecology of corticolous lichens: 1. The zonation on oak and birch in south Devon. Journal of Ecology 59: 431-439.
22. Hedenås, H. & Ericson, L. 2000: Epiphytic macrolichens as conservation indicators: successional sequence in Populus tremula stands. Biological Conservation 93: 43-53.
23. Hultengren, S. 1995: The lichen flora on a giant oak in Västergötland, W Sweden. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 89: 165-170. [In Swedish and with English abstract].
24. Johansson, P. & Ehrlén, J. 2003: Influence of habitat quantity, quality and isolation on the distribution and abundance of two epiphytic lichens. Journal of Ecology 91: 213-221.
25. Kålås, J. A., Viken, Å. & Bakken, T. 2006: 2006 Norwegian Red List. Artsdatabanken, Norway. [In Norwegian with with English abstract].
26. Kantvilas, G. & Jarman, S. J. 2004: Lichens and bryophytes on Eucalyptus obliqua in Tasmania: management implications in production forests. Biological Conservation 117: 359-373.
27. Kerr, D. R. & Meador, J. P. 1996: Modelling dose response using generalized linear models. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15: 395-401.
28. Ludwig, G. & Schnittler, M. 1996: Rote Liste gefährdeter Pflanzen Deutschlands. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn.
29. Niklasson, M., Lindbladh, M. & Björkman, L. 2002: A longterm record of Quercus decline, logging and fires in a southern Swedish Fagus-Picea forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 765-774.
30. Nitare, J. 2000: Indicator species for assessing the nature conservation value of woodland sites: a flora of selected cryptogams. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Sweden. [In Swedish with English summary].
31. Pedersen, I. 1980: Epiphytic lichen vegetation in an old oak wood, Kaas Skov. Botanisk Tidsskrift 75: 105-120.
32. R Development Core Team 2008: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
33. Ranius, T., Johansson, P., Berg, N. & Niklasson, M. 2008: The influence of tree age and microhabitat quality on the occurrence of crustose lichens associated with old oaks. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 653-662.
34. Ranius, T., Niklasson, M. & Berg, N. 2009: A comparison of methods for estimating the age of hollow oaks. Ecoscience 16: 167-174.
35. Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kanerva, T. & Mannerkoski, I. 2001: The red list of Finnish species. Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki. [In Finnish with with English abstract].
36. Rogers, R. W. 1988: Succession and survival strategies in lichen populations on a palm trunk. Journal of Ecology 76: 759-776.
37. Rose, F. 1974: The epiphytes of oak. In: Morris, M. G. & Perring, F. H. (eds.), The British oak. Its history and natural history: 250-273. E.W. Classey, Ltd., Farringdon.
38. Rose, F. 1992: Temperate forest management. Its effect on bryophyte and lichen floras and habitats. In: Bates, J. W. & Farmer, A. M. (eds.), Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment: 211-233. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Rozas, V. 2003: Tree age estimates in Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur: testing previous and improved methods. Plant Ecology 167: 193-212.
40. Rydberg, H. 1997: Caliciales lichens on old oaks in Södermanland, Sweden. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 91: 39-57. [In Swedish with English abstract].
41. Sillett, S. C., McCune, B., Peck, J. E., Rambo, T. R. & Ruchty, A. 2000: Dispersal limitations of epiphytic lichens result in species dependent on old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 10: 789-799.
42. Snäll, T., Ribeiro, P. J. Jr. & Rydin, H. 2003: Spatial occurrence and colonisations in patch-tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal. Oikos 103: 566-578.
43. Snäll, T., Hagström, A., Rudolphi, J. & Rydin, H. 2004: Distribution pattern of the epiphyte Neckera pennata on three spatial scales - importance of past landscape structure, connectivity and local conditions. Ecography 27: 757-766.
44. Snäll, T., Ehrlén, J. & Rydin, H. 2005: Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape. Ecology 86: 106-115.
45. Stat Soft Inc. 2004: STATISTICA (data analysis software system), ver. 7. www.statsoft.com.
46. Tibell, L. 1977: The lichen order Caliciales in Sweden. Introduction and the genus Calicium. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 71: 239-259. [In Swedish with English abstract].
47. Tibell, L. 1978: The lichen order Caliciales in Sweden. The genera Chaenotheca and Coniocybe. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 72: 171-188. [In Swedish with English abstract].
48. Uliczka, H. & Angelstam, P. 1999: Occurrence of epiphytic macrolichens in relation to tree species and age in managed boreal forest. Ecography 22: 396-405.
49. Walser, J., Zoller, S., Büchler, U. & Scheidegger, C. 2001: Species-specific detection of Lobaria pulmonaria (lichenized ascomycete) diaspores in litter samples trapped in snow cover. Molecular Ecology 10: 2129-2138.
50. Woods, R. G. & Coppins, B. J. 2003: A conservation evaluation of British lichens. British Lichen Society, London.