QoE for mobile TV services

Multimedia Transcoding in Mobile and Wireless Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 178-197

  Agboma, Florence ^a   Liotta, Anotonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349357993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-984-7.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Agboma, F., & Liotta, A. (2007). Addressing user expectations in mobile content delivery. Mobile Information Systems Journal 3(3-4), 153-164.
2. Apteker, R.T., Fisher, J.A., Kisimov, V.S., & Neishlos, H. (1995). Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Transaction Multimedia, 3(3), 32-40.
3. Callet, L.P., Viard-Gaudin, C., & Péchard, S. (2006). No reference and reduced reference video quality metrics for end to end QoS monitoring. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 89(3), 289-296.
4. Claypool, M., &Tanner, J. (1999). The effects of jitter on the perceptual quality of video. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia, 115-118.
5. comScore. (2007). comScore study reveals that mobile TV currently most popular among males and younger age segments [press release].
6. David, S., Man, L., & Renaud, C. (Eds.). (2006). QoS and QoE management in UMTS cellular Systems. Wiley.
7. EBU. (2003). BPN 056:SAMVIQ-Subjective assessment methodology for video quality.
8. Empririx. (2003). Assuring QoE on next generation networks [white paper].
9. Fechner, G.T. (1966). Elements of psychophysics. Holt Rinehart & Winston.
10. Ghinea, G., Thomas, J.P., & Fish, R.S. (1999). Multimedia, network protocols and users-Bridging the Gap. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia, 1, 473-476.
11. Gilliam, D. (2006). The appeal of mobile video: Reading between the lines. Retrieved from http://www.tdgresearch.com/tdg_opinions_the_appeal_of_mobile_video.htm
12. Hands, D.P. QoS for mobile multimedia, BTexact Technologies. Retrieved from http://www.iee.org/oncomms/pn/visualinformation/%20P-Qos_For_Mobile_Multimedia.pdf
13. Hands, D. (2004). A basic multimedia quality model. IEEE Transaction on Multimedia, 6(6), 806-816.
14. ISO 9241-11. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: Guidance on usability.
15. ITU-R. (1997). Recommendation BS.1116. Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems.
16. ITU-R. (2002). Recommendation BT500, methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures.
17. ITU-R. (2004). BT 1683, objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for standard definition digital broadcast television in the presence of a full reference.
18. ITU-T. (1996). Recommedation P.800, methods for subjective determination of transmission quality.
19. ITU-T. (1999). Recommedation P.910, subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications.
20. ITU-T. (2004). J.144, objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference.
21. ITU-T Recommendation. P.930. (1996). Principles of a reference impairment system for video.
22. Joly, A., Nathalie, M., & Marcel, B. (2001). Audio-visual quality and interactions between television audio and video. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications, Malaysia.
23. Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., Vadakital, V., Liinasuo, M., & Hannuksela, M. M. (2006). Acceptance of audiovisual quality in erroneous television sequences over a DVB-H channel. Proceedings of the Workshop in Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, 1-5.
24. Ketola, P., & Röykkee, M. (2001). The three facets of usability in mobile handsets. Proceedings of the CHI Workshop, Mobile Communications: Understanding Users, Adoption & Design. Seattle, Washington.
25. Knoche, H., McCarthy, J., & Sasse, M.A. (2005). Can small be beautiful? Assessing image resolution requirements for mobile TV. Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia, 829-838.
26. Knoche, H., McCarthy, J., & Sasse, M.A. (2008). How low can you go? The effect of low resolutions on shot types in mobile TV. Personalized and Mobile Digital TV Applications in Springer Multimedia Tools and Applications Series, 36(1-2), 145-166.
27. Koucheryavy, Y., Moltchanov, D., & Harju, J. (2003). Performance evaluation of live video streaming service in 802.11b WLAN environment under different load conditions. Proceedings of the MIPS, Italy, 30-41.
28. Levine, W.M., & Shefner, J.M. (2000). Fundamentals of sensation and perception (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
29. Lloyd, E., Maclean, R., & Stirling, A. (2006). Mobile TV-Results from the BT Movio DAB-IP pilot in London. EBU Technical Review. Retrieved from http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_framesetindex.html
30. Lucy, S., & Sara, K. (2006). Usability guidelines for mobile TV design. Serco.
31. McCarthy, J., Sasse, M.A., & Miras, D. (2004). Sharp or smooth? Comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video. Proceedings of the SIGCHI, 535-542.
32. Murphy, S., Searles, M., Rambeau, C., & Murphy, L. (2004). Evaluating the impact of network performance on video streaming quality for categorised video content. Proceedings of the Packet Video Workshop.
33. Nokia. (2004). Quality of experience (QoE) of mobile services: Can it be measured and improved? White Paper No. 11212-1004. Finland.
34. Nokia. (2005). Finnish mobile TV: Pilot results. Retrieved from http://www.mobiletv.nokia.com/download_counter.php?file=/onAir/finland/files/RIPress.pdf
35. Olista. (2007). Live trials by Olista with European mobile operators demonstrate common barriers for mobile data services [press release 120207-1].
36. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1998). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. University of Chicago Press.
37. Richardson, I.E.G. (2003). H.264 and MPEG-4 video compression: Video coding for next generation multimedia. Wiley.
38. Robert, E.M. (1986). On judging quality by price: Price dependent expectations, not price dependent preferences. Southern Economic Journal, 52(3), 665-672.
39. Siller, M. (2006). An agent-based platform to map quality of service to experience in active and conventional networks [doctoral thesis]. Colchester, England: University of Essex.
40. Siller, M., & Woods, J.C. (2003). QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission. Proceedings of IEE Visual Information Engineering, 238-241.
41. Sodergard, C. (2003). Mobile television-Technology and user experiences report on the mobile-TV project. VTT Information Technology.
42. Teyeb, O., Sørensen, T,B., Mogensen, P., & Wigard, J. (2006). Evaluation of packet service performance in UMTS and heterogeneous networks. Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Quality of Service & Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks, 95-102.
43. Voelcker, R., Hands, D., Davis, A., Bourret, A., & Bayart, D. (2003). Video quality measurement-Predicting subjective quality using perceptual models. Journal of the Communications Network, 1(3).
44. VQEG. (2007). VQEG multimedia test plan. Retrieved from http://www.vqeg.org
45. Watson, A.B., Hu, J., & McGowan III, J.F. (2001). DVQ: A digital video quality metric based on human vision. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 10(1), 20-29.
46. Webster, A.A., Jones, C.T., & Pinson, M.H. (1993). An objective video quality assessments system based on human perception. Proceedings of the SPIE, 1913, 15-26.
47. Winkler, S. (2005). Digital video quality: Vision models and metrics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
48. Winkler, S., & Campos, R. (2003). Video quality evaluation for Internet streaming applications. Proceedings of the SPIE: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 5007, 104-115.
49. Winkler, S., & Dufaux, F. (2003). Video quality evaluation for mobile applications. Proceedings of the SPIE: Visual Communications and Image Processing, 5150, 593-603.
50. Winkler, S., & Faller, C. (2005). Maximizing audiovisual quality at low bitrates. Proceedings of the Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics.
51. Wolf, S., & Pinson, M.H. (2005). Low bandwidth reduced reference video quality monitoring system. Proceedings of the Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics.
52. Yang, F., Wan, S., Chang, Y., & Wu, H.R. (2005). A novel objective no-reference metric for digital video quality assessment. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(10), 685-688.
53. Zapater, M.N., & Bressan, G. (2007). A proposed approach for quality of experience assurance for IPTV. Proceedings of the IEEE Digital Society.