Demystifying constructivism: The role for the teacher in new technology exploiting learning situations

Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K-12 Level

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 493-514

  Adams, Paul ^a  

^a NEWMAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349346936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-494-1.ch028     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Adams, P. (2003). Thinking skills and constructivism. Teaching Thinking, 10 (Spring), 50-54.
2. Bartlett, S., Burton, D., & Peim, N. (2001). Introduction to education studies. London: Paul Chapman.
3. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 873-878.
4. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.
5. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 115-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5 th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
7. Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 73, 28-36.
8. Copley, J. (1992). The integration of teacher education and technology: A constructivist model. In D. Carey, R. Carey, D. Willis, & J. Willis (Eds.), Technology and teacher education (p. 681). Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
9. Crowther, D. T. (1997). Editorial. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(2). Retrieved January 17, 2004, from http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejsev2n2ed.html
10. Delanty, G. (2000). Citizenship in a global age. Buckingham: Open University Press.
11. Driver, R., Aasoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
12. Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459-486). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Fontana, D. (1995). Psychology for teachers. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
14. Goodman, Y.M., & Goodman, K.S. (1990). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education, instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 223-250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hanley, S. (1994). On constructivism. Retrieved February 12, 2004, from http://www.towson.edu/csme/mctp/Essays/Constructivism.txt
16. Hein, G. E. (1991, October 15-22). Constructivist Learning Theory, the museum and the needs of people. Proceedings of the CECA Conference, Jerusalem, Israel.
17. Heylighen, F. (1993). Epistemology, introduction. Retrieved March 2, 2004, from http://pespmc.vub.ac.be/EPISTEMI.html
18. Jonassen, D. H. (1990). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist view of instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(9), 32-34.
19. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Evaluating constructivist learning. Educational Technology, 36(9), 28-33.
20. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.
21. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.icaap.org/iuicode?2.1.2.3
22. Mann, C. (1994). New technologies and gifted education. Roeper Review, 16, 172-176.
23. Mautner, T. (Ed.). (1996). The Penguin dictionary of philosophy. London: Penguin.
24. Murphy, E. (1997). Constructivism from philosophy to practice. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/~elmurphy/emurphy/cle.html
25. Omrod, J. (1995). Educational psychology: Principles and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Postlethwaite, K. (1993). Differentiated science teaching. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
27. Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
28. Reeves, T. (1992). Effective dimensions of interactive learning systems. Proceedings of the Information Technology for Training and Education Conference (ITTE '92).
29. Rice, M. L., & Wilson, E. K. (1999). How technology aids constructivism in the social studies classroom. Retrieved February 2, 2003, from http://global.umi.com/pqdweb
30. Riel, M. (1990). Building a new foundation for global communities. The Writing Notebook, (January/February), 35-37.
31. Salomon, G. (1991). From theory to practice: The international science classroom-A technology-intensive, exploratory, team-based and interdisciplinary high school project. Educational Technology, 31(3), 41-44.
32. Saunders, W. (1992). The constructivist perspective: Implications and teaching strategies for science. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 136-141.
33. Strommen, E. F., & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology and the future of classroom learning. Education and Urban Society, 24, 466-476.
34. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sutton, A. (2000). Would the real Vygotsky please stand up? Teaching Thinking, 1(Spring), 52-55.
36. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology and Society, 3(2), 50-60.
37. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know? (pp. 17-40). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
38. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
39. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspective and practice (pp. 3-7). New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21.
43. Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
44. Yager, R. (1991). The constructivist learning model, towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57.