Hydroelasticity of ships: Recent advances and future trends

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment

Volumn 223, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 305-330

  Hirdaris, S E ^a   Temarel, P ^b  

^a LLOYD'S REGISTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hydroelasticity; Non linearities; Ship design; Slamming; Springing; Viscous effects; Wave loads; Whipping

Indexed keywords

NON-LINEARITIES; SHIP DESIGN; SLAMMING; SPRINGING; VISCOUS EFFECTS; WAVE LOADS; WHIPPING; SHIP DESIGNS; VISCOUS EFFECT; WAVE LOAD;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROELASTICITY; OCEANOGRAPHY; OFFSHORE STRUCTURES; SHIPBUILDING; SLAMMING (SHIPS); STRUCTURAL LOADS; VISCOUS FLOW; ELASTICITY; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; SHIPS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN; SLAMMING (SHIPS);

EID: 70349345905     PISSN: 14750902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/14750902JEME160     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Inglis, C. E. Natural frequencies and modes of vibration in beams of non-uniform mass and section. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1929, 72, 145-166.
2. Heller, S. R. and Abramson, H. N. Hydroelasticity -a new naval science. J. Am. Soc. Nav. Engrs, 1959, 71 , 205-209.
3. Chen, X. J., Wu, Y. S., Cui, W. C., and Jensen, J. J. Review of hydroelasticity theories for global response of marine structures. Ocean Engng, 2006, 33 , 439-457.
4. Bishop, R. E. D. and Price, W. G. Hydroelasticity of ships, 1979 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
5. Bishop, R. E. D., Price, W. G., and Wu, Y. A general linear hydroelasticity theory of floating structures moving in a seaway. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1986, A316, 375-426.
6. Bishop, R. E. D., Price, W. G., and Tam, P. K. Y. A unified dynamic analysis of ship response to waves. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1977, 119, 363-390.
7. Bishop, R. E. D., Chalmers, D. W., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. The dynamic characteristics of unsymmetrical ship structures. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1986, 128, 205-215.
8. Bishop, R. E. D., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. A unified dynamic analysis of antisymmetric ship responses to waves. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1980, 122, 349-365.
9. Belik, O., Bishop, R. E. D., and Price, W. G. A simulation of ship responses due to slamming in irregular head waves. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1983, 125, 237-253.
10. Belik, O., Bishop, R. E. D., and Price, W. G. Influence of bottom and flare slamming on structural responses. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1988, 130, 261-275.
11. Bishop, R. E. D., Clarke, J. D., and Price, W. G. Comparison of full scale and predicted responses of two frigates in a severe weather trial. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1983, 125, 153-166.
12. Bishop, R. E. D., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. A hypothesis concerning the disastrous failure of the ONOMICHI-MARU. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1985, 127, 169-186.
13. Bishop, R. E. D., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. A theory on the loss of the MV Derbyshire. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1991, 133, 389-453.
14. Aksu, S., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional hydroelasticity theories including the effect of slamming. Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 1991, 205(C1), 3-15. DOI: 10.1243/PIME-PROC-1991-205-084-02.
15. Aksu, S., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. Steady state and transient responses of bulk carriers and tankers in random seas. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1996, 138, 72-102.
16. Bishop, R. E. D. and Eatock Taylor, R. On wave-induced stress in a ship executing symmetric motions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1973, A275, 1-32.
17. Keane, A. J., Temarel, P., Wu, X. J., and Wu, Y. Hydroelasticity of non-beamlike ships in waves. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1991, A334, 339-355.
18. Bingham, A. E., Hampshire, J. K., Miao, S. H., and Temarel, P. Motions and loads of a trimaran travelling in regular waves. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Fast sea transportation FAST, 2001, II, pp. 167-176.
19. Ergin, A., Price, W. G., Randall, R., and Temarel, P. Dynamic characteristics of a submerged, flexible cylinder vibrating in finite water depths. J. Ship Res., 1992, 36, 154-167.
20. Louarn, F. and Temarel, P. An investigation of the structural dynamics of a racing yacht. In 14th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium, USA, 1999.
21. Lundgren, J., Price, W. G., and Wu, Y. S. A hydroelastic investigation into the behaviour of a floating 'dry' dock in waves. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1989, 131, 213-231.
22. Fu, Y., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. The 'dry' and 'wet' towage of a jack-up in regular and irregular waves. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1987, 129, 147-159.
23. Price, W. G., Salas Inzunza, M., and Temarel, P. The dynamic behaviour of a mono-hull in oblique waves using two- and three-dimensional fluid structure interaction models. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 2002, 144, 1-26.
24. Hirdaris, S. E., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. Two-and three-dimensional hydroelastic analysis of a bulker in waves. Mar. Structs, 2003, 16, 627-658.
25. Hirdaris, S. E., Miao, S. H., Price, W. G., and Temarel, P. The influence of structural modelling on the dynamic behaviour of a bulker in waves. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in marine technology, China, 2006, pp. 25-33.
26. Basaran, I., Belik, O., and Temarel, P. Dynamic behaviour of a container ship using two- and three-dimensional hydroelasticity analyses. In Proceedings of the 27th OMAE, 2008, paper 57401.
27. Harding, R. D., Hirdaris, S. E., Miao, S. H., Pittilo, M., and Temarel, P. Use of hydroelasticity analysis in design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in marine technology, China, 2006, pp. 1-12.
28. Hirdaris, S. E., Bakkers, N., White, N., and Temarel, P. Service factor assessment of a great lakes bulk carrier incorporating the effects of hydroelasticity. Mar. Technol. J., SNAME, 2009, 46 (2), 116-221.
29. Hermundstad, O. A., Aarsnes, J. V., and Moan, T. Linear hydroelastic analysis of high speed catamarans and monohulls. J. Ship Res., 1999, 43(1), 48-63.
30. Du, S. X., Wu, Y. S., and Price, W. G. Forward speed effect on the structural responses of a ship travelling in waves. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Hydroelasticity in marine technology, Fukuoka, Japan, 1998, pp. 401-410.
31. Rémy, F., Molin, B., and Ledoux, A. Experimental and numerical study of the wave response of a flexible barge. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in marine technology, China, 2006, pp. 255-264.
32. Senjanovic, I., Malenica, S., Tomasevic, S., and Rudan, S. Methodology of ship hydroelasticity investigation. BrodoGradnja (Croatian Shipbuilding), 2007, 58, 133-145.
33. Ergin, A. and Temarel, P. Free vibration of a partially liquid-filled and submerged, horizontal cylindrical shell. J. Sound Vibr., 2002, 259, 951-965.
34. Ug urlu, B. and Ergin, A. A hydroelastic investigation of circular cylindrical shells containing flowing fluid with different end conditions. J. Sound Vibr., 2008, 318, 1291-1312.
35. Kashiwagi, M. Research on hydroelastic responses of VLFS: recent progress and future work. Int. J. Offshore and Polar Engng, 2000, 10(2), 81-90.
36. Riggs, H. R., Suzuki, H., Ertekin, R. C., Kim, J. W., and Iijima, K. Comparison of hydroelastic computer codes based on the ISSC VLFS benchmark. Ocean Engng, 2008, 35(7), 589-597.
37. Aksu, S., Price, W. G., Suhrbier, K. R., and Temarel, P. A comparative study of the dynamic behaviour of a fast patrol boat travelling in rough seas. Mar. Structs, 1991, 6, 421-441.
38. Miao, S. H., Temarel, P., and Hampshire, J. K. Dynamic loads on a trimaran travelling in irregular seaways, including slamming. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Hydroelasticity in marine technology, Oxford, 2003, pp. 185-194.
39. Jensen, J. J. and Dogliani, M. Wave-induced ship hull vibrations in stochastic seaways. Mar. Structs, 1996, 9(3), 353-387.
40. Xia, J. Z., Wang, Z. H., and Jensen, J. J. Nonlinear wave loads and ship responses by a time domain strip theory. Mar. Structs, 1998, 11(3), 101-123.
41. Park, J. H. and Temarel, P. The influence of nonlinearities on wave-induced motions and loads predicted by two-dimensional hydroelasticity analysis. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium PRADS, Houston, Texas, 2007, vol.1, pp. 27-34.
42. Wu, Y. S., Maeda, H., and Kinoshita, T. The second order hydrodynamic actions on a flexible body. J. Inst. Ind. Sci., Univ. Tokyo, 1997, 49(4), 8-19.
43. Chen, X. J., Jensen, J. J., Cui, W. C., and Fu, S. X. Hydroelasticity of a floating plate in multidirectional waves. Ocean Engng, 2003, 30(15), 1997-2017.
44. ISSC, Report of Technical Committee I.2: loads. In Proceedings of the 16th International Ships and Offshore Structures Congress, Southampton, 2006, vol.1, pp. 83-170.
45. ITTC, Seakeeping Committee final report. In Proceedings of 25th International Towing Tank Conference, Fukuoka, Japan, 2008, vol.I, pp. 209-262.
46. Watanabe, I., Ueno, M., and Swada, H. Effects of bow flare shape to wave impact pressure. J. Soc. Nav. Architects of Japan, 1989, 259-266.
47. Chen, R. S., Du, S. X., Wu, Y. S., Lin, J. R., Hu, J. J., and Yue, Y. L. Experiment on extreme wave loads of a flexible ship model of the S175 container ship, China Ship Scientific Research Center report, 1999.
48. Storhaug, G. and Moan, T. Springing/whipping response of a large ocean-going vessel investigated by an experimental method. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Practical design of ships and other floating structures PRADS, Houston, Texas, 2007, vol.1, pp. 419-427.
49. Oka, M., Ogawa, Y., Tozawa, S., and Oka, S. A study for the assessment of design loads of a high speed vessel taking into account of the whipping vibration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Violent flows, Fukuoka, Japan, 2007.
50. Oka, M., Ogawa, Y., Oka, S., and Tozawa, S. The experimental study on wave loads acting on a large container carrier. In Conference Proceedings of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 2008, vol.6, pp. 31-43.
51. Du, S. X., Hudson, D. A., Price, W. G., Temarel, P., Chen, R., and Wu, Y. Wavelet analysis of loads on a flexible ship model traveling in large-amplitude waves. J. Ship Res., 2008, 52(4), 249-262.
52. IACS. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers, International Association of Classification Societies, 2006.
53. IACS. Common Structural Rules for Tankers, International Association of Classification Societies, 2006.
54. Lloyd's Register. Structural design assessment (SDA) procedure for the primary structure of container ships, Guidance on direct calculations, ShipRight procedures for design and construction, 2006.
55. Hoppe, H. Goal-based standards - a new approach to the international regulation of ship construction. WMU J. Maritime Affairs, 2005, 4(2), 169-180.
56. Timman, R. and Newman, J. N. The coupled damping coefficients of symmetric ships. J. Ship Res., 1962, 5, 34-55.
57. Stavovy, A. B. and Chuang, S. L. Analytical determination of slamming pressures for high speed vehicles in waves. J. Ship Res., 1976, 20, 190-198.
58. Pedersen, P. T. A beam model for the torsional-bending response of ship hulls. Trans. R. Instn Nav. Architects, 1983, 125, 171-182.
59. Santos, F. M., Temarel, P., and Guedes Soares, C. Modal analysis of a fast patrol boat made of composite material. Ocean Engng, 2009, 36(2), 179-192.
60. Beaumont, J. and Robinson, D. W. Classification aspects of ship flexibility. Phil. Trans.: Phys. Sci. Engng, 1991, 334, 371-386.
61. IACS. Strength Unified Requirement S11, Longitudinal Strength Standard, International Association of Classification Societies, 2007.
62. Nitta, A., Arai, H., and Magaino, A. Basis of IACS Unified Longitudinal Strength Standard. Mar. Structs, 1992, 5, 1-21.
63. Lewis, E. V. (Ed.) Principles of naval architecture, vols I and III, 1989 (SNAME).
64. IACS. Unified Recommendation 34, Standard Wave Data, R.34, International Association of Classification Societies, 2001.
65. MAIB. Report on the investigation of the structural failure of MSC Napoli English Channel on 18 January 2007, report 9/2008, April 2008.
66. Steen, E., Storhaug, G., Kippenes, J., Sado, O., Austefjord, H., and Dugstad, G. Ultimate strength assessment of engine room area of the container vessel MSC Napoli January 2007 incident. In RINA International Conference on Design and operation of container ships, London, 3-4 July 2008, pp. 23-37.
67. BMT, Global Wave Statistics, 1986. Compiled and Edited by British Maritime Technology Ltd.
68. Kumai, T. Damping factors in the higher modes of ship vibrations. Eur. Shipbuilding, 1958, 1, 29-34.
69. MARIN. Pressure calculation programme for 3D sea-keeping problems, PRECAL V 6.2 Users Manual, 2005.
70. Lloyd's Register. Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Naval Ships, Environmental Conditions, vol.1, Part 5, Chapter 2, Section 2, 2008.
71. Baarholm, G. S. and Jensen, J. J. Influence of whipping on long-term vertical bending moment. J. Ship Res., 2004, 48, 261-272.
72. Buchner, B. On the impact of green water loading on ship and offshore unit design. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium PRADS, 1995, vol.1, pp. 430-443.
73. Querard, A. B. G., Temarel, P., and Turnock, S. R. A RANS approach to hydrodynamic and hydro-elastic responses of a flexible barge. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Hydrodynamics ICHD, Nantes, France, 2008, pp. 493-504.
74. Querard, A. B. G., Temarel, P., and Turnock, S. R. Hydrodynamics of ship-like sections in heave, sway and roll motions predicted using an unsteady RANS method. J. Engng Maritime Environment, 2009 (accepted for publication).
75. Brizzolara, S., Couty, N., Hermundstad, O., Kuk-kanen, T., Ioan, A., Viviani, M., and Temarel, P. Comparison of experimental and numerical loads on an impacting bow section. Ships and Offshore Structs, 2008, 3(4), 305-324.
76. Aarsnes, J. V. Drop test with ship sections - effect of roll angle, Marintek report 603834.00.01, 1996.
77. Faltinsen, O. M. Water entry of a wedge by hydroelastic orthotropic plate theory. J. Ship Res., 1999, 43, 180-193.
78. Bereznitski, A. Slamming: the role of hydroelasticity. Int. Shipbuilding Progress, 2001, 48, 333-351.
79. Stenius, I., Rosen, A., and Kuttenkeuler, J. Explicit FE - modelling of hydroelasticity in panel-water impacts. Int. Shipbuilding Progress, 2007, 54, 111-127.
80. Lin, W. M., Meinhold, M., Salvesen, N., and Yue, D. K. P. Large-amplitude motions and wave loads for ship design. In Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Naval hydrodynamics, 1994, pp. 205-226.
81. Dowell, E. H. and Hall, K. C. Modeling of fluid-structure interaction. Annual Rev. Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33, 445-490.
82. Torii, R., Oshima, M., Kobayashi, T., Takagi, K., and Tezduyar, T. E. Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid-structure interactions with the deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space-time formulation. Computer Meth. Appl. Mechanics Engng, 2006, 195, 1885-1895.
83. Figueroa, C. A., Vignon-Clementel, I. E., Kenneth, E., Jansen, K. E., Hughes, J. R. T., and Taylor, C. A. A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries. Computer Meth. Appl. Mechanics Engng, 2006, 195, 5685-5706.
84. Matthies, H. G. and Steindorf, J. Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction. Computers and Structs, 2003, 81, 805-812.
85. Le Tallec, P., Gerbeau, J. F., Hauret, P., and Vidrascu, M. Fluid structure interaction problems in large deformation. Comptes Rendus Mecanique, 2005, 333(12), 910-922.