"Boys will be boys" and other gendered accounts: An exploration of victims' excuses and justifications for unwanted sexual contact and coercion

Violence Against Women

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 810-834

  Weiss, Karen G ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Excuses; Gender stereotypes; Justifications; Rape myths; Sexual victimization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RAPE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; VICTIM;

ADULT; AGGRESSION; COERCION; CRIME VICTIMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RAPE; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 70349332879     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801209333611     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Amir, M. (1971). Patterns of forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L.E. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey (BJS Special Report, NCJ 154348). Available from the Bureau of Justice Statistics Clearinghouse.
3. Basile, K.C. (1999). Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women give in to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence Against Women, 5, 1036-1058.
4. Baumer, E.P., Felson, R.B., & Messner, S.F. (2003). Changes in police notification for rape, 1973-2000. Criminology, 41, 841-873.
5. Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 9-25). New York: John Wiley.
6. Bell, S.T., Kuriloff, P.J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719-1734.
7. Bennett-Herbert, T., Silver, R.C., & Ellard, J.H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: How and why do women stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 311-325.
8. Benson, M.L. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology, 23, 583-607.
9. Bergen, R.K. (1998). The reality of wife rape: Women's experiences of sexual violence in marriage. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 237-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Bohner, G., Reinhard, M., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
11. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Women, men and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12. Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
13. Burt, M.R. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 251-269). New York: John Wiley.
14. Carmody, D.C., & Washington, L.M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 424-436.
15. Clay-Warner, J., & Burt, C.H. (2005). Rape reporting after reforms: Have times really changed? Violence Against Women, 11, 150-176.
16. Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Cook, S.L. (1995). Acceptance and expectation of sexual aggression in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 181-194.
18. Cowan, G. (2000). Women's hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths. Violence Against Women, 6, 238-246.
19. Currie, D.H. (1998). Violent men or violent women? Whose definition counts? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Eigenberg, H. (2003). Victim blaming. In L. J. Moriarty (Ed.), Controversies in victimology (pp. 15-24). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
21. Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Ferraro, K.J., & Johnson, J.M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325-339.
23. Finkelhor, D., & Yllö, K. (1985). License to rape: Sexual abuse of wives. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24. Fischer, G.J. (1986). College student attitudes toward forcible date rape: Cognitive predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 457-467.
25. Fisher, B.S., Cullen, F.T., & Turner, M.G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
26. Frazier, P.A., & Seales, L.M. (1997). Acquaintance rape is real rape. In M. D. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women (pp. 54-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Friedland, S.I. (1991). Date rape and the culture of acceptance. Florida Law Review, 43, 488-527.
28. Frohmann, L. (1991). Discrediting victims' allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213-226.
29. Gavey, N. (1999). I wasn't raped, but...: Revisiting definitional problems in sexual victimization. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 57-81). New York: New York University Press.
30. Goodchilds, J.D., Zellman, G.L., Johnson, P.B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II (pp. 245-269). New York: Garland.
31. Jackson, S. (1995). The social context of rape: Sexual scripts and motivation. In P. Searles & R. J. Berger (Eds.), Rape and society (pp. 16-27). San Francisco: Westview.
32. Kahn, A.S., Mathie, V.A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66.
33. Kanin, E.J. (1984). Date rape: Unofficial criminals and victims. Victimology, 9, 95-108.
34. Konradi, A. (1996). Understanding rape survivors' preparations for court. Violence Against Women, 2, 25-62.
35. Koss, M.P., & Cook, S.L. (1993). Date and acquaintance rape are significant problems for women. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 104-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Koss, M.P., Dinero, T.E., Seibel, C.A., & Cox, S.L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victims' experiences? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1-24.
37. Koss, M.P., Gidycz, C.A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
38. LaFree, G.D. (1989). Rape and criminal justice: The social construction of sexual assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
39. Layman, M.J., Gidycz, C.A., & Lynn, S.J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 124-131.
40. Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
41. Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
42. Mahoney, P., & Williams, L.M. (1998). Sexual assault in marriage: Prevalence, consequences, and treatment of wife rape. In J. L. Jasinski & L. M. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence (pp. 113-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Malamuth, N.M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138-157.
44. Malamuth, N.M., & Check, J.V.P. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299-320.
45. Marshall, A. (2003). Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law and Social Inquiry, 28, 659-689.
46. Martin, P.Y., & Hummer, R.A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender & Society, 3, 457-473.
47. Martin, P.Y., & Powell, R.M. (1994). Accounting for the second assault: Legal organizations' framing of rape victims. Law and Social Inquiry, 19, 853-890.
48. Miller, B., & Marshall, J. (1987). Coercive sex on the university campus. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 38-47.
49. Mills, R.B., & Malley-Morrison, K. (1998). Emotional commitment, normative acceptability and attributions for abusive partner behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 682-700.
50. Muehlenhard, C.L., & Hollabaugh, L.C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872-879.
51. Muehlenhard, C.L., & Linton, M.A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186-196.
52. Payne, D.L., Lonsway, K.A., & Fitzgerald, L.F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27-68.
53. Ptacek, J. (1998). Why do men batter their wives? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 181-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Pugh, M.D. (1983). Contributory fault and rape convictions: Loglinear models for blaming the victim. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 233-242.
55. Quinn, B.A. (2000). The paradox of complaining: Law, humor, and harassment in the everyday work world. Law and Social Inquiry, 25, 1151-1185.
56. Sanday, P.R. (1990). Fraternity gang rape. New York: New York University Press.
57. Schultz, L.G., & DeSavage, J. (1975). Rape and rape attitudes on a college campus. In L. G. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology (pp. 77-90). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
58. Schwartz, M.D., & DeKeseredy, W.S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Scott, M.B., & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
60. Scully, D. (1990). Understanding sexual violence. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
61. Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530-544.
62. Shotland, R.L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220-232.
63. Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649-679.
64. Sykes, G.M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.
65. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2000). National Crime Victimization Survey interviewing manual for field representatives. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
66. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2004). National Crime Victimization Survey [Computer file]. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Producer and Distributor]. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ncvs104.pdf.andwww.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ncvs204.pdf
67. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2003). Introduction. In National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-2000 (pp. 1-30) [Computer file]. Conducted by U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [Producer and Distributor].
68. Warshaw, R. (1988). I never called it rape: The Ms. report on recognizing, fighting and surviving date and acquaintance rape. New York: Ms. Foundation/Harper & Row.
69. Weis, K., & Borges, S.S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8, 71-115.
70. Weiss, K.G. (2004, March). Expanding the empirical scope of sexual victimization: An analysis of nonclassifying incidents utilizing National Crime Victimization Survey narratives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, New York.
71. Weiss, K.G. (2006). (Re)defining sexual victimization: An analysis of victims' excuses and justifications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University, New York.
72. Williams, L. S. (1984). The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 31, 459-467. Yescavage, K. (1999). Teaching women a lesson: Sexually aggressive and sexually nonaggressive men's perceptions of acquaintance and date rape. Violence Against Women, 5, 796-812.