Objectification theory and our understanding of indoor tanning

Archives of Dermatology

Volumn 145, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1059-1060

  Stapleton, Jerod ^a   Turrisi, Rob ^b   Todaro, Alyssa ^b   Robinson, June K ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY BUILD; COMPREHENSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SKIN COLOR; SKIN TANNING; STUDENT; THEORY; UNIVERSITY;

BEAUTY CULTURE; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70349331063     PISSN: 0003987X     EISSN: 15383652     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.190     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Cafri G, Thompson JK, Jacobsen PB. Appearance reasons for tanning mediate the relationship between media influences and UV exposure and sun protection. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(8):1067-1069. (Pubitemid 44268491)
2. Jackson KM, Aiken LS. Evaluation of a multicomponent appearance-based sun protective intervention for young women: uncovering the mechanisms of program efficacy. Health Psychol. 2006;25(1):34-46.
3. Poorsattar SP, Hornung RL. Television turning more teens toward tanning? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(1):171-172.
4. Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA. Objectification theory: toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychol Women Q. 1997;21:173-206.
5. McKinley NM, Hyde JS. The objectified body consciousness scale: development and validation. Psychol Women Q. 1996;20:181-215. (Pubitemid 126318501)
6. Stice E, Shaw H. Eating disorder prevention programs: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(2):206-227. (Pubitemid 38317809)
7. Moradi B, Huang YP. Objectification theory and psychology of women: a decade of advances and future directions. Psychol Women Q. 2008;32:377-398.