Property in body parts and products of the human body

Liverpool Law Review

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 35-55

  Pawlowski, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biotechnological products; Body parts; Genetic material; Human body; Property

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349327700     PISSN: 0144932X     EISSN: 15728625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10991-009-9052-2     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Barish, M.I. The law of testamentary disposition-a legal barrier to medical advance! Temple L.Q. 30: 40-46.
2. Bell, A.P. 1984. The Doctor and the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Legal Studies 4: 175-184.
3. Biagi, Karen G. 1991. Moore v. regents of the University of California: Patients, property rights, and public policy. St. Louis University Law Journal 35: 433.
4. Boulier, W. 1995. Sperm, spleens, and other valuables: The need to recognize property rights in human body parts. Hofstra Law Review 23: 693-731.
5. Brahams, D. 1998. Body parts as property. Medico-Legal Journal 66: 45-47.
6. Bray, M.B. 1990. Personalizing personalty: Toward a property right in human bodies. Texas Law Review 69: 209.
7. Canadian Law Reform Commission. 1992. Procurement and transfer of human tissues and organs. Paper No. 66.
8. Castel, J.G. (1968). Some legal aspects of human organ transplantation in Canada. Canadian Bar Review, 345-405.
9. Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, (17th ed. 1995), p. 635, para. 13-50.
10. 1995. Commentary, negligence: Interference with right to possession of a body. Medical Law Review 222-227.
11. 1996. Commentary, psychiatric injury and mishandling of a corpse. Medical Law Review 4: 216-220.
12. 1997. Commentary, property rights and body parts. Medical Law Review 5: 110-114.
13. 1998. Commentary. Theft of body parts: Property and dead bodies. Medical Law Review 247-253.
14. De Stoop, D.F. 1974. The law in Australia relating to the transplantation of organs and cadavers. Australian Law Journal 48: 21-28.
15. Dickens, B.M. 1977. The control of living body materials. University of Toronto Law Journal 27: 142-198.
16. Dickens, B.M. 1992. Living tissue and organ donors and property law: More on Moore. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 8: 73.
17. Dillon, T.P. 1989. Source compensation for tissues and cells used in biotechnical research: Why a source shouldn't share in the profits. Notre Dame Law Review 64: 628.
18. Dworkin, G. 1970. The law relating to organ transplantation in England. Medical Law Review 33: 353-377.
19. Dworkin, G., and I. Kennedy. 1993. Human tissue: Rights in the body and its parts. Medical Law Review 291-319.
20. Epstein, R. (1979). Possession as the root of title. Georgia Law review, 13, 1220.
21. Gerike, P.A. (1991). Human biological material: A proprietary interest or part of the monastic being? Ohio NUL Review 17: 805.
22. Grandolfo, Gina M. 1992. The human property gap. Santa Clara Law Review 32: 957.
23. Halsbury's Laws (vol. 10, 4th ed.), paras 1015-1019.
24. Hardiman, R. 1986. Toward the right of commerciality: Recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue. UCLA Law Review 34: 207.
25. Harper, T. 1976. Body snatchers. New Law Journal 126: 1007.
26. Hume, S.G. 1956-58. Dead bodies. Sydney Law Review 2: 109-128.
27. Ivey, L.M. 1991. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: Insufficient protection of patients' rights in the biotechnological market. Georgia Law Review 25: 489.
28. Jackson. 1950. The law of cadavers and of burial places (2nd ed.).
29. Kennedy, I., and A. Grubb. 1994. Medical law (2nd ed.), 1102-1175. London: Butterworths.
30. Kennedy McColl, I. 1969. Alive or dead-The lawyer's view. Current Legal Problems 22: 102.
31. Kennedy McColl, I. 1976. Further thoughts on liability for non-observance of the provisions of the Human Tissue Act 1961. Medical Science and Law 16: 49-55.
32. Kennedy McColl, I. 1995. Negligence: Interference with right to possession of a body. Medical Law Review 3: 222.
33. Krauskopf, B.J. 1958. The law of dead bodies: Impeding medical progress. Ohio State Law Journal 19: 455-475.
34. Kuzenski, W.F. 1924. Property in dead bodies. Marquette Law review 9(17): 17-24.
35. Lanham, D. 1971. Transplants and the Human Tissue Act 1961. Medical Science and the Law 11: 16-24.
36. Lavoie, J. 1989. Ownership of human tissue: Life after Moore v. Regents of the University of California. Virginia Law Review 75: 1363.
37. Louisell, D.W. 1969. The procurement of organs for transplantation. Northwestern University Law Review 64: 607-624.
38. Magnusson, R.S. 1992. The recognition of proprietary rights in human tissue in common law jurisdictions. Melbourne University Law Review 18: 601.
39. Magnusson, R.S. 1993. Proprietary rights in human tissue. In Interests in goods eds. Palmer and McKendrick, pp. 237-266.
40. Matthews, P. 1981. Specification in the common law. Anglo-American Law Review 10: 121.
41. Matthews, P. 1983. Whose body? People as property. Current Legal Problems 36: 193-239.
42. Notes. 1974. The sale of human body parts. Michigan Law Review 72: 1182-1264.
43. Notes. 1976. Body attachment and body execution: Forgotten but not gone. William and Mary Law Review 17: 543.
44. O'Carroll, T. 1996. Over my dead body: Recognizing property rights in corpses. Journal of Health and Hospital Law 29: 238.
45. Olender, J.H. 1960. Donation of dead bodies and parts thereof for medical use. University of Pittsburg Law Review 21: 523-541.
46. Pakel, 1965. Spare parts for the human engine. Pennsylvania Bar Association Quarterly 37: 71.
47. 1991. Palmer on bailment, 9 (2nd ed).
48. Pawlowski, M. 1996. Dead bodies as property. New Law Journal 146(6772): 1828-1829.
49. Pawlowski, M. 1997. Property in dead and living bodies. Health Care Risk Report 3(6): 9-10.
50. Pawlowski, M. 1998. Property in bodily parts. Health Care Risk Report 5(2): 12-13.
51. Perley, S. 1992. From control over one's body to control over one's body parts: Extending the doctrine of informed consent. New York University Law Review 67: 335.
52. Plante, M. 1968. An analysis of informed consent. Ford Law Review 36: 639-672.
53. Price, T.W. 1951. Legal rights and duties in regard to dead bodies, post-mortems and dissections. South African Law Journal 68: 403-423.
54. Ritter, Peter K. 1992. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: The splenetic debate over ownership of human tissue. Sw. UL Review 21: 1465.
55. Robertson, J.A. 1988. Fetal tissue transplants. Washington University Law Quarterly 66: 443.
56. Skegg, P.D.G. 1974. Liability for the unauthorized removal of cadaveric transplant material. Medicine, Science and the Law 14: 53-57.
57. Skegg, P.D.G. 1975. Human corpses, medical specimens and the law of property. Anglo-American Law Review 4: 412-425.
58. Skegg, P.D.G. 1977. Liability for the unauthorized removal of cadaveric transplant material: Some further comments. Medicine, Science and the Law 17: 123.
59. Skegg, P.D.G. 1984. Law, ethics, and medicine. Oxford: Clarendon.
60. Skegg, P.D.G. 1991. The use of corpses for medical education and research: The legal requirements. Medicine, Science and the Law 31: 345.
61. Skegg, P.D.G. 1992. Medical uses of corpses and the "no property" rule. Medicine Science and Law 32: 311-313.
62. Skegg, P.D.G. (1997). The "no property" rule and rights relating to dead bodies. Tort Law Review 222-229.
63. Smith, A.T.H. 1976. Stealing the body and its parts. Criminal Law Review 622-627.
64. Stickel, D.L. 1967. Organ transplantation in medical and legal perspectives. Law and Contemporary Problems 32: 597-619.
65. Vestal, A., R. Taber, and W. Shoemaker. 1955. Medico-legal aspects of tissue homotransplantation. U. Det. Law Journal 18: 171-194.
66. Wasmuth, C.E., and B.H. Stewart. 1965. Medical and legal aspects of human organ transplantation. Clev. Mar. Law Review 14: 442-468.
67. Zellick, G. 1972. Organ transplantation. New Law Journal 1078-1080.