Research methods for organizational learning: The transatlantic gap

Management Learning

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 439-447

  Easterby Smith, Mark ^a   Li, Shenxue ^b   Bartunek, Jean ^c  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Organizational learning; Research methods; UK; USA

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349327319     PISSN: 13505076     EISSN: 14617307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350507609339682     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bapuji, H. and Crossan, M.M. (2004) From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research, Management Learning 35(4): 397-417.
2. Bartunek, J.M. (2007) Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need Not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration, Academy of Management Journal 50(6): 1323-33.
3. Bartunek, J.M. and Seo, M.G. (2002) Qualitative Research Can Add New Meanings to Quantitative Research, Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(2): 237-42.
4. Beyer, J.M. (1997) Building on Past Strengths with Incremental Change, Academy of Management Journal 40(6): 1436-41.
5. Drejer, A., Blackmon, K. and Voss, C. (2000) Worlds Apart?-A look at the Operations Management Area in the US, UK and Scandinavia, Scandinavian Journal of Management 16: 45-66.
6. Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M. (2003) Re-reading Organizational Learning: Selective Memory, Forgetting, and Adaptation, Academy of Management Executive 17(2): 51-5.
7. Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M. and Nicolini, D. (2000) Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present and Future, Journal of Management Studies 37(6): 783-96.
8. Easterby-Smith, M., Golden-Biddle, K. and Locke, K. (2008a) Working with Pluralism: Determining Quality in Qualitative Research, Organizational Research Methods 11(3): 418-29.
9. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Jackson, P. (2008b) Management Research. London: SAGE.
10. Easterby-Smith, M., Antonacopoulou, E., Simm, D. and Lyles, M. (2004) Constructing Contributions to Organizational Learning: Argyris and the Next Generation, Management Learning 35(4): 371-80.
11. Eden, D. and Rynes, S. (2003) From the Editors, Academy of Management Journal 46(6): 679-83.
12. Edmondson, A.C. (2002) The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective, Organization Science 13(2): 128-46.
13. Gordon, R.A. and Howell, J.E. (1959) Higher Education for Business. Ford Foundation.
14. Hinings, B. (1988) Defending Organization Theory: A British View from North America, Organization Studies 9(1): 2-7.
15. Johnson, J.L. and Podsakoff, P.M. (1994) Journal Influence in the Field of Management: An Analysis Using Salancik's Index in a Dependency Framework, Academy of Management Journal 37(5): 1392-407.
16. Koza, M.P. and Thoenig, J.C. (1995) Organizational Theory at the Crossroads: Some Reflections on European and United States' Approaches to Organizational Research, Organization Science 6(1): 1-8.
17. Park, S.H. and Gordon, M.E. (1996) Publication Records and Tenure Decisions in the Field of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal 17(2): 109-28.
18. Rynes, S. (2004) From the Editors, Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 454.
19. Schminke, M. and Mitchell, M. (2003) From the Editors, Academy of Management Journal 46(3): 279-82.
20. Shaw, G.B. (1942) Picturesque Speech and Patter, Reader's Digest November: 100.
21. Tahai, A. and Meyer, M.J. (1999) A Revealed Preference Study of Management Journals' Direct Influences, Strategic Management Journal 20(3): 276-96.
22. Üsdiken, B. and Pasadeos, Y. (1995) Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-Citation Networks, Organization Studies 16(3): 503-27.
23. Vince, R., Sutcliffe, K. and Olivera, F. (2002) Organizational Learning: New Directions, British Journal of Management 13(S2): S1-6.