Toward an organismal, integrative, and iterative phylogeography

BioEssays

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 784-793

  Buckley, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Causality; Complexity; Explanation; Hierarchy; Hypothesis testing; Organism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DATA ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SAMPLING; ANIMAL; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 70349326213     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.200800162     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Mayr, E., The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1982.
2. Futuyma, D. J., Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer, 1986.
3. Bock, W. J., Explanations in evolutionary theory. J Zool Syst Evol Res 2007. 45: 98-103.
4. O'Hara, R. J., Homage to Clio, or, toward an historical philosophy for evolutionary biology. Syst Zool 1988. 37: 142-155.
5. Avise, J. C., The history and purview of phylogeography: A personal reflection. Mol Ecol 1998. 7: 371-379.
6. Arbogast, B. S. and Kenagy, G. J., Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. J Biogeogr 2001. 28: 819-825.
7. Kidd, D. M. andRitchie,M.G., Phylogeographic information system: Putting the geography into phylogeography. J Biogeogr 2006. 33: 1851-1865.
8. Bermingham, E. and Moritz, C., Comparative phylogeography: Concepts and implications. J Biogeogr 1998. 7: 367-369.
9. Dolman, G. and Moritz, C., A multilocus perspective on refugial isolation and divergence in rainforest skinks (Carlia). Evolution 2006. 60: 573-582.
10. Backström, N., Fagerberg, S. and Ellegren, H., A gene-based set of reference markers evenly spread across the avian genome. Mol Ecol 2008. 17: 964-980.
11. Hickerson, M. J. and Moritz, C., Comparative phylogeographic summary statistics for testing simultaneous vicariance. Mol Ecol 2006. 15: 209-223.
12. Leaché, A. D., Crews, S. C. and Hickerson, M. J., Two waves of diversification in mammals and reptiles of Baja California revealed by hierarchical Bayesian analysis. Biol Lett 2007. 3: 646-650.
13. Hein, J., Schierup, M. H. and Wiuf, C., Gene Genealogies, Variation and Evolution. A Primer in Coalescent Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005.
14. Knowles, L. L. and Carstens, B. C., Estimating a geographically explicit model of population divergence. Evolution 2007. 61: 477-493.
15. Drummond, A. J. and Rambaut, A., BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 2007. 7: 214.
16. Mazzocchi, F., Complexity in biology. EMBO Rep 2008. 9: 10-14.
17. Kauffman, S. A., The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.
18. Simon, H. A., The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Phil Soc 1962. 106: 467-482.
19. Vrba, E. S. and Eldredge, N., Individuals, hierarchies and processes: Toward a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology 1984. 10: 146-171.
20. Vrba, E. S., What are the biotic hierarchies of integration and linkage? In: Wake, D. B. and Roth, G. editors. Complex Organismal Functions: Integration and Evolution in Vertebrates. Life Science Research Reports. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1989. p. 379-401.
21. Valentine, J. W. and May, C. L., Hierarchies in biology and paleontology. Paleobiology 1996. 22: 23-33.
22. Valentine, J. W., Architectures of biological complexity. Integr Comp Biol 2003. 43: 99-103.
23. Hey, J. and Machado, C. A., The study of structured populations - New hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat Rev Genet 2003. 4: 535-543.
24. Rosenberg, N. A. and Nordborg, M., Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of the genetic polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 2002. 3: 380-390.
25. Nielsen, R. and Beaumont, M. A., Statistical inferences in phylogeography. Mol Ecol 2009. 18: 1034-1047.
26. Endler, J. A., Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton, Princeton University Press. 1977.
27. Templeton, A. R., Routman, E. and Phillips, C. A., Separating population structure from population history: A cladistic analysis of the geographic distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the Tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics 1995. 140: 767-782.
28. Templeton, A. R., Out of Africa again and again. Nature 2002. 416: 45-51.
29. Lowe, W. H., McPeek, M. A., Likens, G. E. and Cosentino, B. J., Linking movement behaviour to dispersal and divergence in plethodontid salamanders. Mol Ecol 2008. 17: 4459-4469.
30. Nathan, R., Getz, W. M., Revilla, E., Holyoak, M., Kadmon, R., et al A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008. 105: 19052-19059.
31. Lemmon, A. R. and Moriarty Lemmon, E. C., A likelihood framework for estimating phylogeographic history on a continuous landscape. Syst Biol 2008. 57: 544-561.
32. Monahan,W. B. and Hijmans, R. J., Ecophysiological constraints shape autumn migratory response to climate change in the North American field sparrow. Biol Lett 2008. 4: 595-598.
33. Mitchell, S. D. and Dietrich, M. R., Integration without unification: an argument for pluralism in the biological sciences. Am Nat 2006. 168: S73-S79.
34. Pigliucci, M., From molecules to phenotypes? The promise and limits of integrative biology. Basic Appl Ecol 2003. 4: 297-306.
35. Wake, M. H., The evolution of integration of biological systems: an evolutionary perspective through studies on cells, tissues, and organs. Am Zool 1990. 30: 897-906.
36. Wake, M. H., What is "Integrative Biology"? Integr Comp Biol 2003. 43: 239-241.
37. Knowles, L. L., The burgeoing field of statistical phylogeography. J Evol Biol 2004. 17: 1-10.
38. Knowles, L. L. and Maddison, W. P., Statistical phylogeography. Mol Ecol 2002. 11: 2623-2635.
39. Hey, J. and Nielsen, R., Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence times, with applications to divergence of Drosophila pseudobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 2004. 167: 747-760.
40. Hey, J. and Nielsen, R., Integration within the Felsenstein equations for improved Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007. 104: 2785-2790.
41. Ellison, A. M., Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecol Lett 2004. 7: 509-520.
42. McCarthy, M. A., Bayesian Methods for Ecology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2007.
43. McCarthy, M. A. and Masters, P., Profiting from prior information in Bayesian analyses of ecological data. J Appl Ecol 2005. 42: 1012-1019.
44. McCarthy, M. A., Citroen, R. and McCall, S. C., Allometric scalling and Bayesian priors for annual survival of birds and mammals. Am Nat 2008. 172: 216-222.
45. Beaumont, M. A. and Rannala, B., The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nat Rev Genet 2004. 5: 251-261.
46. Alfaro, M. E. and Holder, M. T., The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 2006. 37: 19-42.
47. Richards, C. L., Carstens, B. C. and Knowles, L. L., Distribution modeling and statistical phylogeography: an integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographical hypotheses. J Biogeogr 2007. 34: 1833-1845.
48. Manel, S., Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G. and Taberlet, P., Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 2003. 18: 189-197.
49. Storfer, A., Murphy, M. A., Evans, J. S., Goldberg, C. S., Robinson, S., et al Putting the 'landscape' in landscape genetics. Heredity 2007. 98: 128-142.
50. Carstens, B. C. and Richards, C. L., Integrating coalescent and ecological niche modeling in comparative phylogeography. Evolution 2007. 61: 1439-1454.
51. Swenson, N. G., The past and future influence of geographic information systems on hybrid zone, phylogeographic and speciation research. J Evol Biol 2008. 21: 421-434.
52. Spirin, V., Gelfand, M. S., Mironov, A. A. and Mirny, L. A., A metabolic network in the evolutionary context: multiscale structure and modularity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006. 103: 8774-8779.
53. Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L. and Solé, R. V., Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 2006. 442: 259-264.
54. Wolf, J. B. and Trillmich, F., Kin in space: social viscosity in a spatially and genetically substructured network. Proc Biol Sci 2008. 275: 2063-2069.
55. Fortuna, M. A., Gómez-Rodríguez, C. and Bascompte, J., Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proc Biol Sci 2006. 273: 1429-1434.
56. Proulx, S. R., Promislow, D. E. and Phillips, P. C., Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 2005. 20: 345-353.
57. Weitz, J. S., Benfey, P. N. and Wingreen, N. S., Evolution, interactions, and biological networks. PLoS Biol 2007. 5: e11.
58. Huson, D. H. and Bryant, D., Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 2006. 23: 254-267.
59. Rozenfeld, A. F., Arnaud-Haond, S., Hernández-García, E., Eguiluz, V. M., Serrao, E. A. and Duarte, C. M., Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulation system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008. 105: 18824-18829.
60. Clauset, A., Moore, C. and Newman, M. E. J., Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 2008. 453: 98-101.
61. Dyer, R. J., GeneticStudio: a suite of programs for spatial analysis of genetic-marker data. Mol Ecol Res 2009. 99: 110-113.
62. Dyer, R. J. and Nason, J. D., Population Graphs: The graph theoretic shape of genetic structure. Mol Ecol 2004. 13: 1713-1727.
63. Pigliucci, M. and Kaplan, J. M., Making Sense of Evolution. The Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Biology. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2006.
64. Dixon, P. and O'Reilly, T., Scientific versus statistical inference. Canad J Exp Psych 1999. 53: 133-149.
65. Beaumont, M. A. and Panchal, M., On the validity of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Mol Ecol 2008. 17: 2563-2565.
66. Templeton, A. R., Statistical phylogeography: Methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Mol Ecol 2004. 13: 789-809.
67. Templeton, A. R., Nested clade analysis: an extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Mol Ecol 2008. 17: 1877-1880.
68. Templeton, A. R., Statistical hypothesis testing intraspecific phylogeography: Nested clade phylogeography analysis vs. approximate Bayesian computation. Mol Ecol 2009. 18: 319-331.
69. Gifford, M. E. and Larson, A., In situ genetic differentiation in a Hispaniola lizard (Ameiva chrysolaema): A multilocus perspective. Mol Phyl Evol 2008. 49: 277-291.
70. Wagner, G. P., What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part I: Why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations? J Exp Zool (Mol Develop Evol) 2000. 288B: 95-98.
71. Amundson, R., The trials and tribulations of selectionist explanations. In: Hahlweg, K. and Hooker, C. A. editors. Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology. SUNY Series in Philosophy and Biology. New York, State University of New York Press, 1989. p. 413-432.
72. Holling, C. S. and Allen, C. R., Adaptive inference for distinguishing credible from incredible patterns in nature. Ecosystems 2002. 5: 319-328.
73. Cushman, S. A., McKelvey, K. S., Hayden, J. and Schwartz, M. K., Gene flow in complex landscapes: Testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 2006. 168: 486-499.
74. Richards-Zawacki, C. L., Quantifying the contributions of alternative landscape factors to gene flow in Panamanian golden frogs. Diversity & Distributions 2009. in press.
75. Martínez-Solano, I., Jockusch, E. L. and Wake, D. B., Extreme population subdivision throughout a continuous range: Phylogeography of Batrachoseps attenuatus (Caudata: Plethodontidae) in western North America. Mol Ecol 2007. 16: 4335-4355.
76. Martínez-Solano, I. and Lawson, R., Escape to Alcatraz: evolutionary history of slender salamanders (Batrachoseps) on the islands of San Francisco Bay. BMC Evol Biol 2009. 8: 38.