A BDI-based reflective infrastructure for dynamicworkflows

Proceedings - IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 112-119

  Richly, Sebastian ^a   Buecke, Wolfgang ^a   Assmann, Uwe ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT TECHNOLOGY; BDI (BELIEF-DESIRE-INTENTION); BUSINESS PROCESS; RUNTIMES; UNEXPECTED EVENTS; WORK-FLOWS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; PERSONNEL; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 70349323533     PISSN: 15417719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EDOCW.2008.2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. M. Adams, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, W. M. P. van der Aalst, and D. Edmond. Dynamic, extensible and context-aware exception handling for workflows. In OTM Conferences (1), pages 95-112, 2007.
2. D. Barbara, S. Mehrotra, and M. Rusinkiewicz. INCAs: Managing Dynamic Workflows in Distributed Environments. Journal of Database Management, 7(1):5-15, 1996.
3. M. Bratman. Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass, 1987.
4. B. Dellen, F. Maurer, and G. Pews. Knowledge-based techniques to increase the flexibility of workflow management. Data Knowledge Engineering, 23(3):269-315, 1997.
5. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, and A. Sheth. An Overview of Workflow Management: From Process Modeling to Workflow Automation Infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, pages 119-153, 1995.
6. M. Huber. JAM: a BDI-theoretic mobile agent architecture. Proceedings of the third annual conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 236-243, 1999.
7. G. Joeris and O. Herzog. Managing evolving workflow specifications with schema versioning and migration rules. Technical Report 15-1999, Center for Computing Technologies (TZI), University of Bremen, 1999.
8. P. Kammer, G. Bolcer, R. Taylor, A. Hitomi, and M. Bergman. Techniques for Supporting Dynamic and AdaptiveWorkflow. Computer Supported CooperativeWork (CSCW), 9(3):269-292, 2000.
9. P. J. Kammer. A Distributed Architectural Approach to SupportingWork Practice. PhD thesis, University Of California, Irvine, 2004.
10. D. Müller, M. Reichert, and J. Herbst. A new paradigm for the enactment and dynamic adaptation of data-driven process structures. In CAiSE, pages 48-63, 2008.
11. R. Müller, U. Greiner, and E. Rahm. Agentwork: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. volume 51, pages 223-256, 2004.
12. M. Pesic, M. H. Schonenberg, N. Sidorova, and W. M. P. van der Aalst. Constraint-based workflow models: Change made easy. In OTM Conferences (1), pages 77-94, 2007.
13. A. Pokahr, L. Braubach, and W. Lamersdorf. Jadex: A BDI reasoning engine. Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
14. M. Reichert and P. Dadam. ADEPT flex -Supporting Dynamic Changes ofWorkflowsWithout Losing Control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10(2):93-129, 1998.
15. S. Richly, D. Habich, A. Ruempel, W. Buecke, and S. Preissler. Open service process platform 2.0. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2008, 8-11 Jul, Hawaii, USA), 2008.
16. S. Russel and P. Norvig. Artificial intelligence. Prentice- Hall, 2nd edition edition, 2003.
17. S. Sadiq. Handling dynamic schema change in process models. Database Conference, 2000. ADC 2000. Proceedings. 11th Australasian, pages 120-126, 2000.
18. B. Weber, B. F. V. Dongen, M. Pesic, and C. W. Guenther. Supporting flexible processes through recommendations based on history.
19. B. Weber, S. Rinderle, and M. Reichert. Change patterns and change support features in process-aware information systems. In CAiSE, pages 574-588, 2007.
20. B. Weber, S. Rinderle, W. Wild, and M. Reichert. Ccbrdriven business process evolution. In International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning 2005, pages 610-624, 2005.
21. M. Woolridge. Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, chapter 1. MIT Press, 1999.