Appropriateness of Collaborations between Industry and the Medical Profession: Physicians' Perceptions

American Journal of Medicine

Volumn 122, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 955-960

  Ross, Joseph S ^a,b   Keyhani, Salomeh ^a,b   Korenstein, Deborah ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude of health personnel; Biomedical research; Drug industry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPENSATION; COOPERATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG INDUSTRY; ETHICS; ETHNICITY; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; MEDICAL DEVICE INDUSTRY; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DRUG INDUSTRY; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; NEW YORK CITY; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PRIVATE SECTOR; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 70349315008     PISSN: 00029343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Angell M. Relationships with the drug industry: keep at arm's length. BMJ 338 (2009) b222
2. American Medical Association. Opinion 8.061: Gifts to Physicians from Industry (March 2008). http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4001.html Accessed August 5, 2008
3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Industry Funding of Medical Education. Report of an AAMC Task Force (2008), Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
4. Advanced Medical Technology Association. Code of ethics on interactions with health care professionals (December 2008). http://www.advamed.org/NR/rdonlyres/61D30455-F7E9-4081-B219-12D6CE347585 /0/AdvaMedCodeofEthicsRevisedandRestatedEffective20090701.pdf Accessed April 5, 2009
5. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. Code on interactions with healthcare professionals (July 2008). http://www.phrma.org/files/PhRMA%20Marketing%20Code%202008.pdf Accessed April 5, 2009
6. Campbell E.G., Gruen R.L., Mountford J., Miller L.G., Cleary P.D., and Blumenthal D. A national survey of physician-industry relationships. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 1742-1750
7. Brett A.S., Burr W., and Moloo J. Are gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic?. A survey of physicians. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003) 2213-2218
8. Steinman M.A., Shlipak M.G., and McPhee S.J. Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions. Am J Med 110 (2001) 551-557
9. Agrawal S., Saluja I., and Kaczorowski J. A prospective before-and-after trial of an educational intervention about pharmaceutical marketing. Acad Med 79 (2004) 1046-1050
10. Schneider J.A., Arora V., Kasza K., et al. Residents' perceptions over time of pharmaceutical industry interactions and gifts and the effect of an educational intervention. Acad Med 81 (2006) 595-602
11. World Association of Medical Editors. WAME Policy Statements: authorship (January 10, 2007). http://www.wame.org/resources/policies#authorship Accessed July 9, 2008
12. In: DeMets D.L., Friedman L.M., and Furberg C.D. (Eds). Data Monitoring in Clinical Trials: A Case-studies Approach (2005), Springer Publishing Co, New York, NY
13. DeAngelis C.D., and Fontanarosa P.B. Impugning the integrity of medical science: the adverse effects of industry influence. JAMA 299 (2008) 1833-1835
14. Harris Interactive. Prestige paradox: high pay doesn't necessarily equal high prestige. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=939 Accessed December 12, 2008