Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: A reply to Rossion

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 286-292

  Riesenhuber, Maximilian ^a   Wolff, Brian S ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational modeling; Face perception; Holistic; Inversion effect; Object recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACE; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION;

FACE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 70349312379     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anzai A., Peng X., and Van Essen D.C. Neurons in monkey visual area V2 encode combinations of orientations. Nature Neuroscience 10 10 (2007) 1313-1321
2. Cadieu C., Kouh M., Pasupathy A., Connor C.E., Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. A model of V4 shape selectivity and invariance. Journal of Neurophysiology 98 3 (2007) 1733-1750
3. Carey S., and Diamond R. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 115 (1986) 107-117
4. Farah M.J., Tanaka J.W., and Drain H.M. What causes the face inversion effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 21 3 (1995) 628-634
5. Freedman D.J., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T., and Miller E.K. Comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization. Journal of Neuroscience 23 (2003) 5235-5246
6. Freire A., Lee K., and Symons L.A. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception 29 2 (2000) 159-170
7. Fukushima K. Neocognitron: A self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics 36 4 (1980) 193-202
8. Gilaie-Dotan S., and Malach R. Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. Cerebral Cortex 17 2 (2007) 325-338
9. Goffaux V., and Rossion B. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 33 4 (2007) 995-1002
10. Golarai G., Ghahremani D.G., Whitfield-Gabrieli S., Reiss A., Eberhardt J.L., Gabrieli J.D., et al. Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory. Nature Neuroscience 10 4 (2007) 512-522
11. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., and Kanwisher N. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience 7 5 (2004) 555-562
12. Haig N.D. The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception 13 5 (1984) 505-512
13. Jiang X., Bradley E., Rini R.A., Zeffiro T., Vanmeter J., and Riesenhuber M. Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity. Neuron 53 6 (2007) 891-903
14. Jiang X., Rosen E., Zeffiro T., Vanmeter J., Blanz V., and Riesenhuber M. Evaluation of a shape-based model of human face discrimination using FMRI and behavioral techniques. Neuron 50 1 (2006) 159-172
15. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17 11 (1997) 4302-4311
16. Lampl I., Ferster D., Poggio T., and Riesenhuber M. Intracellular measurements of spatial integration and the MAX operation in complex cells of the cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysics 92 (2004) 2704-2713
17. Leder H., and Carbon C.C. Face-specific configural processing of relational information. British Journal of Psychology 97 Pt 1 (2006) 19-29
18. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., and Poggio T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology 5 (1995) 552-563
19. Murray J.E. The ups and downs of face perception: Evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces. Perception 33 4 (2004) 387-398
20. Perrett D., and Oram M. Neurophysiology of shape processing. Image and Vision Computing 11 (1993) 317-333
21. Riesenhuber M., Jarudi I., Gilad S., and Sinha P. Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Supplements) 271 (2004) S448-S450
22. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Are cortical models really bound by the "binding problem"?. Neuron 24 1 (1999) 87-93 111-125
23. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1019-1025
24. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Models of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience Supplements 3 (2000) 1199-1204
25. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12 (2002) 162-168
26. Rossion B. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 128 2 (2008) 274-289
27. Rossion B., and Boremanse A. Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: Evidence from the face composite illusion. Journal of Vision 8 4 (2008) 1-13
28. Rossion B., and Gauthier I. How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 1 1 (2002) 63-75
29. Rotshtein P., Geng J.J., Driver J., and Dolan R.J. Role of features and second-order spatial relations in face discrimination, face recognition, and individual face skills: Behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19 9 (2007) 1435-1452
30. Serre T., Kreiman G., Kouh M., Cadieu C., Knoblich U., and Poggio T. A quantitative theory of immediate visual recognition. Progress in Brain Research 165 (2007) 33-56
31. Serre T., Oliva A., and Poggio T. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 15 (2007) 6424-6429
32. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 46 2 (1993) 225-245
33. Tsao D.Y., and Freiwald W.A. What's so special about the average face?. Trends in Cognitive Science 10 9 (2006) 391-393
34. Ungerleider L.G., and Haxby J.V. 'What' and 'where' in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4 2 (1994) 157-165
35. Wallis G., and Rolls E.T. A model of invariant recognition in the visual system. Progress in Neurobiology 51 (1997) 167-194
36. Williams M.A., Dang S., and Kanwisher N.G. Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance. Nature Neuroscience 10 6 (2007) 685-686
37. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1969) 141-145
38. Young M.P., and Yamane S. Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science 256 5061 (1992) 1327-1331
39. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 44 5 (2004) 889-898