Dropout rate of training cases: Who and when

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 695-702

  Hamilton, Margaret ^a   Wininger, Lionel ^a   Roose, Steven P ^a  

^a Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS; TEACHER;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTORS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY;

EID: 70349303888     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0003065109337508     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Caligor, E., Hamilton, M., Schneier, H., Donovan, J., & Roose, S. (2003). Converted patient and clinic patients as control cases: A comparison with implications for psychoanalytic training. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 51:201-220.
2. Caligor, E., Stern, B., Hamilton, M., Maccornack, V., Wininger, L., & Roose, S. (2009). Why we recommend analytic treatment for some patients and not for others. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 57.
3. Frayn, D.H. (1995). Premature termination issues in psychoanalytic control cases. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis 3: 17-41.
4. Rothstein, A. (1994). A perspective on doing a consultation and making the recommendation of analysis to a prospective analysand. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 63: 680-695.