|
Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 858-
|
Editorial Comment on: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Effect on Operative Time, Length of Hospital Stay, Postoperative Complications, and Success Rate
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL TRIAL;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
META ANALYSIS;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY;
NOTE;
PATIENT SAFETY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PYELOPLASTY;
ROBOTICS;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;
URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY PELVIS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTORS;
ROBOTICS;
SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;
URINARY INCONTINENCE;
UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
|
EID: 70349295459
PISSN: 03022838
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.065 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (5)
|