Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity

Linguistics

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1113-1141

  Nikitina, Tatiana ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349282248     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/LING.2009.039     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersen, Torben. 2002. Case in.ection and nominal head marking in Dinka. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 23(1). 1-30.
2. Andrews, Avery. 1985. The major functions of the noun phrase. In Timothy Shopen (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description, vol.1: Clause structure, 62-154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham. Forthcoming. The typology of motion expressions revisited. To appear in Journal of Linguistics 46(3
4. Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
5. Bohnemeyer, Jurgen, N. J. En.eld, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antunano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lupke & Felix K. Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495-532.
6. Bohnemeyer, Jurgen & Christel Stolz. 2006. Spatial reference in Yukatek Maya: A survey. In Stephen C. Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space, 273-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brauner, Siegmund & Irmtraud Herms. 1979. Lehrbuch des modernen Swahili. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopadie.
8. Cooper, Guy L. III. 2002. Greek Syntax, after K. W. Kruger, vol. 4: Early Greek poetic and herodotean syntax. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location and destination: A typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.) Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19-28. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Dahl, Osten. 1987. Case grammar and prototypes. In René Dirven & Gunter Radden (eds.), Concepts of case, 147-161. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
11. Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
12. Fillmore, Charles J. 1978. On the organization of semantic information in the lexicon. In Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen & Karol W. Todrys (eds.), Papers from the parasession on the lexicon, 148-173. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
13. Fillmore, Charles J. 1983. How to know whether you're coming or going. In Gisa Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis, 219-227. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.
14. Gashilova, Ljudmila B. 1985. Vyraz¡enie prostranstvennoi orientacii v nivxskom iazyke (lokativnye padez¡i i poslelogi). [Avtoreferat dissertatsii]. [The expression of spatial orientation in Nivkh (locative cases and postpositions)] Dissertation abstract. Leningrad.
15. Gruzdeva, Ekaterina. 1998. Nivkh. Munich: Lincom Europa.
16. Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol.2, 211-242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Holisky, Dee Ann. 1989. Laz. In Alice C. Harris (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, Vol.I: The Kartvelian languages, 397-472. New York: Caravan Books.
18. Jackendoff, Ray. 1985. Multiple subcategorization and the y-criterion: the case of climb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 271-295.
19. Kutscher, Silvia. 2001. Nomen und nominales Syntagma im Lasischen: Eine deskriptive Analyse des Dialekts von Ardeşen. Munich: Lincom Europa.
20. Launey, Michel. 1981. Introduction à la langue et à la litterature aztèques, tome 1: Grammaire. Paris: L'Harmattan.
21. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 1978. Ablative-locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics 14. 129-156.
22. Matisoff, James A. 1973. The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23. Mosel, Ulrike. 1980. Tolai and Tok Pisin: The in.uence of the substratum on the development of New Guinea pidgin. Canberra: Australian National University.
24. Nikitina, Tatiana. Forthcoming. Variation in the encoding of endpoints of motion in Russian. To appear in Renee Perelmutter & Viktoria Driagina-Hasko (eds.), Slavic verbs of motion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Nikitina, Tatiana. 2008. Two classes of locative terms and linguistic frames of reference in Wan. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 29(1). 29-47.
26. Song, Grace & Beth Levin. 1998. A compositional approach to cross-linguistic differences in motion expressions. Paper presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York.
27. Smyth, Herbert Weir. 1956 [1920]. Greek grammar. Harvard University Press.
28. Stolz, Thomas. 1992. Lokalkasussysteme. Aspekte einer strukturellen Dynamik. Wilhelmsfeld: Egert.
29. Stolz, Thomas. 1993. Simple vs. complex local relators: A tentative clari.cation. In Thomas Muller-Bardey & Werner Drossard (eds.), Aspekte der Lokalisation: Beitrage zur Arbeitsgruppe «Lokalisation» bei der Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Sprachwissenschaft in Bremen, 1992, 201-220. Bochum: Universitatsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
30. Talmy, Leonard. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol.4, 181-238. New York: Academic Press.
31. Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.III, 57-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event integration. Buffalo Papers in Linguistics 91(1). 147-187.
33. Walchli, Bernhard & Fernando Zúniga. 2006. Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschhung 59(3). 284-303.
34. Wilkins, David P. & Deborah Hill. 1995. When "go" means "come": Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2/3). 209-259.