IPR policy of the DVB project: Negative disclosure, FR&ND arbitration unless pool rules OK, part 2

International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 1-22

  Eltzroth, Carter ^a  

^a DVB Project Office   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Competition; DVB; Intellectual property rights; IRP; Patents; Standardization; Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349268216     PISSN: 15393062     EISSN: 15393054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jitsr.2009070101     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abbott, A.F., & Gebhard, T.A. (2006). Evaluating Antitrust Concerns in Light of Rambus. 16 ANTITRUST (Summer).
2. Baker, K. (2006). Challenges in following Patent Disclosure Rules in Standards Setting, presentation at Standards Bodies & Patent Pools (Washington).
3. Balto, D.A., & Prywes, D.I. (2002). Standard-Setting Disputes: The Need for FTC Guidelines. FTC Watch.
4. Bell, M.L. (2007). Inventing Digital Television: The Inside Story of a Technology Revolution (London).
5. Brenning, M. (2002). Competition and Intellectual Property Policy Implications of late or no IPR Disclosure in Collective Standard Setting. www.ec.europa.eu/comm./competition/speeches/text/sp2002-037.en.pdf
6. Delmas, P. (1991). Le Maitre des Horloges, Modernity de L 'Action Publique (Paris).
7. Dolmans, D., & Grierson, J. (2003). Arbitration and the Modernization of EC Antitrust Law: New Opportunities and New Responsibilities. 14 ICC Int. CT Arbitration Belletin 37. Dolmans, M. (2002).Standards for Standards. 26 Fordham Int. L J, 163 (Nov).
8. DVB Project (eds) (1996). DVB Common Scrambling Algorithm. Distribution Agreements. DVB document A011 rev 1.
9. DVB Project (eds) (2003). MHP Implementation Arrangements and associated agreements. DVB Blue Book A066 rev 1.
10. ETSI (eds) (2006). ETSI Rules of Procedure. Retrieved from http://portal.etsi.org/directives/directives-jul-2006.pdf.
11. ETSI (eds) (2007). ETSI Guide on Intellectual Property Rights. Retrieved from http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI-Guide-on-IPRs.doc.
12. European Commission (eds) (2006). Interactive Content and Convergence: Implications for the Information Sociey.
13. European Commission (eds) (2007). Media Pluralism in the Member States of the European Union. Commission Staff Working Document (SEC, 200732), 13(14).
14. Geradin, D. et al. (2007). The Logic and Limits of Ex Ante Competition in a Standard-Setting Environment. 3 COM POL INT'L, 79.
15. Goodman, D.J., & Myers, R.A. (2005). 3G Cellular Standards and Patents. Presented at the 2005 international conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing. Retrieved from http://eeweb.poly.edu/ dgoodman/wirelesscom2005.pdf.
16. Holleman, R.J. (2002). A Response: Government Guidelines should not be issued in connection with Standard Setting. Retrieved from www.ftc.gov/opp/ intellect/020418 richardjhol-leman2.pdf
17. Layne-Farrar, A. et al (2006). Pricing Patents for Licensing in Standard Setting Organisations: Making Sense of FRAND Commitments. (unpublished).
18. Martin, D.L., & De Meyer, C. (2006). Patent Counting: Misleading Index of Patent Value: A Critique of Goodman & Meyers and its Uses. Retrieved from www.qualcomm.com/common/documents/legal/GMcritique-0107-wp.pdf.
19. Morse, M.H. (2003). Standard Setting and Antitrust: The Intersection between IP Rights and the Antitrust Laws. IP Litigator, 17 ( May/June).
20. Ohana, G. et al, (2003). Disclosure and Negotiation of Licensing Terms prior to Adoption of Industry Standards: Preventing another Patent Ambush. ECLR 12(644).
21. Pate, R.H. (2005). Competition andIntellectual Property in the US: Licensing Freedom and the Limits of Antitrust, Florence.
22. Platt Majoras, D. (2005). Recognising the Pro-competitive Potential of Royalty Discussions in Standard Setting, Stanford.
23. Raymond, D.G. (2002), Benefits and Risks of Patent Pooling for Standard-Setting Organizations. 16 ANTITRUST, 41(summer).
24. Reimers, U. (ed) (2004). DVB: The Family of International Standards for Digital Video Broadcasting, Berlin.
25. Skitol, R.A. (2005). Concerted Buying Power: Its Potential for Addressing the Patent Holdup Problem in Standard Setting. 72 Antitrust L J, 727.
26. Skitol, R.A. (2006). Negotiating Licence Terms within SDOs: from Disclosure Policies to SDO- sponsored Patent Pools, presentation at Standards Bodies & Patent Pools, Washington.
27. Stoner, R.D. (2006). Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Royalty Rates. 6 Antitrust & IPR, 15 (Fall);
28. Swanson D.G.,et al.(2005),Reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) royalties, standards selection and control of market power 73 Antitrust L J, 1.
29. Swanson, D.G. et al. (2005). Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standards Selection and Control of Market Power. 73 Antitrust L J, 1. Taffet, R.A. (2006). Ex ante licensing in Standards Development, presentation to AIPLA, Chicago. Retrieved from www.aipla.org.
30. Updegrove, A. (2006). It's Time to get on the Ex Ante Bus, Consortium Standxarda Bulletin. Retrieved from www.consortiuminfo.org/bul-letins/jun06.php.
31. US DoJ & US FTC (eds) (2007). Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition.
32. US FTC (eds) (2003). To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition andPatent Law and Policies, 3.
33. Vogt, C. (2000). The DVB Multimedia Home Platform. TAM545, DVB Document.
34. Wu, Y., Hirakawa, S., Reimers, U., & Whitaker, J. (2006). Overview of Digital Television Development Worldwide. In Proceedings IEEE, 1