Tarsal and metatarsal bone mineral density measurement using volumetric quantitative computed tomography

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 492-502

  Commean, Paul K ^a   Ju, Tao ^b   Liu, Lu ^b   Sinacore, David R ^c   Hastings, Mary K ^c   Mueller, Michael J ^c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Diabetes mellitus; Foot; Peripheral neuropathy; QCT

Indexed keywords

BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FOOT; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; QCT;

ABERRATIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT ERRORS; MINERALS; MINING; SILICATE MINERALS; TOMOGRAPHY;

BONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METATARSAL BONE; PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TARSAL BONE; VOLUMETRIC QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC NEUROPATHIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METATARSAL BONES; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TARSAL BONES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70349266853     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9118-z     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/criticalpath/whitepaper.html. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Accessed 18 February 2008
2. Biomarkers definitions working group 2001 Commentary: Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework Clin Pharmacol Ther 69 3 89 95
3. Prior F, Commean PK, Ju T, Hastings MK, Hildebolt CF, Sinacore DR: Developing a biomarker for neuropathic arthropathy in diabetic patients. 2007 IEEE/NIH Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop (LISSA 2007)
4. Bonnick SL: Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2004
5. HK Genant K Engelke T Fuerst, et al. 1996 Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art J Bone Miner Res 11 707 730 (Pubitemid 26172795)
6. CF Njeh HK Genant 2000 Bone loss: quantitative imaging techniques for assessing bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Res 2 6 446 450
7. M Jergas M Breitenseher CC Gluer W Yu HK Genant 1995 Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 10 1101 1110
8. TF Lang J Li ST Harris HK Genant 1999 Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative CT J Comput Assist Tomogr 23 1 130 7
9. A Mastmeyer K Engelke C Fuchs WA Kalender 2006 A hierarchical 3D segmentation method and the definition of vertebral body coordinate systems for QCT of the lumbar spine Med Image Anal 10 4 560 77
10. Y Kang K Engelke C Fuchs WA Kalender 2005 An anatomic coordinate system of the femoral neck for highly reproducible BMD measurements using 3D QCT Comput Med Imaging Graph 29 7 533 41
11. Ju T, Warren J, Eichele G, Thaller C, Chiu W, Carson J: A geometry database for gene expression data. In: Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, pages 166-176, 2003
12. J Fabrin K Larsen PE Hostein 2000 Long-term follow-up in diabetic Charcot feet with spontaneous onset Diabetes Care 23 6 796 800
13. JE Diamond MJ Mueller A Delitto DR Sinacore 1989 Reliability of a diabetic foot evaluation Phys Ther 69 797 802
14. DJ Lott MK Hastings PK Commean KE Smith MJ Mueller 2007 Effect of footwear and orthotic devices on stress reduction and soft tissue strain of the neuropathic foot Clin Biomech 22 3 352 359
15. PK Commean MJ Mueller KE Smith, et al. 2002 Reliability and validity of combined imaging and pressures assessment methods for diabetic feet Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 497 505
16. MJ Mueller KE Smith PK Commean DD Robertson JE Johnson 1999 Use of computed tomography and plantar pressure measurement for management of neuropathic ulcers in patients with diabetes Phys Ther 79 296 307
17. RA Robb DP Hanson RA Karwoski AG Larson EL Workman MC Stacy 1989 Analyze: a comprehensive, operator-interactive software package for multidimensional medical image display and analysis Comput Med Imaging Graph 13 433 454
18. Robb RA: Three Dimensional Biomedical Imaging: Principles and Practice, New York: VCH Publishers, 1995
19. KS Fu JK Mui 1981 A survey on image segmentation Pattern Recogn 13 3 16
20. AP Zijdenbos BM Dawant 1994 Brain segmentation and white matter lesion detection in MR images Crit Rev Biomed Eng 22 401 465
21. Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM: Handbook of Medical Imaging: Medical Image Processing and Analysis. In (vol 2). Bellingham, WA: SPIE (The International Society for Optical Engineering), 2000
22. Russ JC: The Image Processing Handbook, 2nd Edition, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995
23. V Girish A Vijayalakshmi 2004 (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ImageJ Indian J Cancer 41 1 47
24. KH Hohne WA Hanson 1992 Interactive 3D segmentation of MRI and CT volumes using morphological operations J Comput Assist Tomogr 16 285 294
25. WA Kalender E Klotz C Suss 1987 Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT Radiology 164 19 23
26. KE Burroughs CD Reimer KB Fields 1998 Lisfranc injury of the foot: a commonly missed diagnosis Am Fam Physician 58 118 24
27. DD Robertson MJ Mueller KE Smith PK Commean T Pilgram J Johnson 2002 Forefoot structural change in individuals with diabetes and prior plantar ulcer J Bone Jt Surg Am vol. (ed), 84-A 8 1395 1404
28. Schaefer S, Hakenberg J, Warren J: Smooth subdivision of tetrahedral meshes. In Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, 2004, pages 151-158
29. Garland M, Heckbert P: Surface Simplification Using Quadric Error Metrics. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 97, 1997, pp. 209-216
30. Shewchuk JR: Tetrahedral mesh generation by Delaunay refinement. In SCG'98: Proceedings of the fourteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1998, pages 86-95
31. CC Gluer G Blake Y Lu BA Blunt M Jergas HK Genant 1995 Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques Osteoporos Int 5 4 262 270
32. DG Armstrong WF Todd LA Lavery, et al. 1997 The natural history of acute Charcot's arthropathy in a diabetic foot specialty clinic J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 87 6 272 278
33. AV Schartz DE Sellmeyer KE Ensrud, et al. 2001 Older women with diabetes have an increased risk of fracture: a prospective study J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86 1 32 38
34. CT Hasselman MT Vogt KL Stone JA Cauley SF Conti 2003 Foot and ankle fractures in elderly white women: Incidence and risk factors J Bone Jt Surg 85 820 824
35. DI Rosenthal MA Ganott G Wyshak DM Slovik SH Doppelt RM Neer 1985 Quantitative computed tomography for spinal density measurement. Factors affecting precision Invest Radiol 20 306 310
36. VB Graves R Wimmer 1985 Long-term reproducibility of quantitative computed tomography vertebral mineral measurements J Comput Tomogr 9 73 76
37. JM Pouilles F Tremollieres N Todorovsky C Ribot 1991 Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 6 997 1002
38. B Lees JC Stevenson 1992 An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry Osteoporos Int 2 146 152
39. CE Cann 1988 Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review Radiology 166 509 522