Variation in outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty clinical trials: A proposed approach to achieving consensus

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2050-2056

  Riddle, Daniel L ^a   Stratford, Paul W ^b   Singh, Jasvinder A ^c   Strand, C Vibeke ^c  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Knee; Outcome assessment; Replacement

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DELPHI STUDY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349264145     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum090356     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. NIH Consensus Panel. NIH consensus statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1328-1335
2. . Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1487-1497
3. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:780-785
4. Ong KL, Mowat FS, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern MT, Kurtz SM. Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;446:22-28 (Pubitemid 44318258)
5. Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Bowman DH. Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: A systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:876-883
6. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997;24:799-802. (Pubitemid 27146105)
7. Pham T, van der HD, Altman RD, et al. OMERACT-OARSI initiative: Osteoarthritis Research Society International set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis clinical trials revisited. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:389-399 (Pubitemid 38594267)
8. Pham T, van der Heijde DM, Lassere M, et al. Outcome variables for osteoarthritis clinical trials: The OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1648-1654 (Pubitemid 36835471)
9. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland. 2001.
10. Grill E, Huber EO, Stucki G, Herceg M, Fialka-Moser V, Quittan M. Identification of relevant ICF categories by patients in the acute hospital. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:447-458 (Pubitemid 40711875)
11. Grill E, Stucki G, Boldt C, Joisten S, Swoboda W. Identification of relevant ICF categories by geriatric patients in an early post-acute rehabilitation facility. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:467-473 (Pubitemid 40711877)
12. Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Don Mills, ON: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1975.
13. Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 2003;41:376-382
14. Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004;44:9-11. (Pubitemid 39307105)
15. Duffield C. The Delphi technique: a comparison of results obtained using two expert panels. Int J Nurs Stud 1993;30:227-237
16. Bond S, Bond J. A Delphi survey of clinical nursing research priorities. J Adv Nurs 1982;7:565-575
17. Jairath N, Weinstein J. The Delphi methodology (part one): A useful administrative approach. Can J Nurs Adm 1994;7:29-42.
18. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal and Delphi Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1975.
19. Reid N. The Delphi technique: its contributions to the evaluation of professional practice. In: Ellis R, editor. Professional Competence and Quality Assurance in the Caring Professions. London: Chapman and Hall; 1988.
20. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:2.
21. Weigl M, Cieza A, Andersen C, Kollerits B, Amann E, Stucki G. Identification of relevant ICF categories in patients with chronic health conditions: a Delphi exercise. J Rehabil Med 2004;12-21. (Pubitemid 39307106)
22. de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach 2005;27:639-643 (Pubitemid 43123659)
23. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984;74:979-983 (Pubitemid 14059576)
24. Williams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. J Adv Nurs 1994;19:180-186
25. Gladman DD, Strand V, Mease PJ, Antoni C, Nash P, Kavanaugh A. OMERACT 7 psoriatic arthritis workshop: synopsis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 2:ii115-ii116.
26. Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S et al. Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 2003;30:868-872 (Pubitemid 36402790)