Finding informative commonalities in concept collections

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 807-816

  Colucci, Simona ^a   Di Sciascio, Eugenio ^a   Donini, Francesco M ^b   Tinelli, Eufemia ^c  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Description logics; Informative common subsumers; Non standard inferences

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC EXTRACTION; CONCEPT DESCRIPTION; CORE COMPETENCE; DESCRIPTION LOGIC; DESCRIPTION LOGICS; INFORMATIVE COMMON SUBSUMERS; LOGIC LANGUAGES; NEW SERVICES; NON-STANDARD INFERENCES; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION;

FEATURE EXTRACTION; FORMAL LOGIC; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

DATA DESCRIPTION;

EID: 70349264012     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1458082.1458190     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. Mc Guinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. F. Baader, I. Horrocks, and U. Sattler. Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic web. In D. Hutter and W. Stephan, editors, Festschrift in honor of Jörg Siekmann, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
3. F. Baader and R. Küsters. Computing the least common subsumer and the most specific concept in the presence of cyclic ALN-concept descriptions. In Proceedings of the Twenty second German Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI'98), volume 1504 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 129-140, Bremen, Germany, 1998. Springer-Verlag.
4. F. Baader, R. Küsters, and R. Molitor. Computing least common subsumer in description logics with existential restriction. Technical Report LTCS-Report 98-09, RWTH Aachen, 1998.
5. F. Baader and R. Molitor. Building and structuring description logic knowledge bases using least common subsumers and concept analysis. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS'00), pages 292-305, London, UK, 2000. Springer-Verlag.
6. F. Baader and B. Sertkaya. Applying formal concept analysis to description logics. In P. Eklund, editor, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2004), volume 2961 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 261-286. Springer, 2004.
7. F. Baader and A.-Y. Turhan. On the problem of computing small representations of least common subsumers. In Proceedings of the Twenty sixth German Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI'02), volume 2479 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Aachen, Germany, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
8. A. Borgida, R. Brachman, D. L. McGuinness, and L. A. Resnick. CLASSIC: A structural data model for objects. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 59-67, 1989.
9. W. Cohen, A. Borgida, and H. Hirsh. Computing least common subsumers in description logics. In P. Rosenbloom and P. Szolovits, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 754-761, Menlo Park, California, 1993. AAAI Press.
10. W. Cohen and H. Hirsh. Learning the CLASSIC description logics: Theorethical and experimental results. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'94), pages 121-133, 1994.
11. S. Colucci, T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, F. Donini, and A. Ragone. Semantic-based skill management for automated task assignment and courseware composition. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13(9):1184-1212, 2007.
12. S. Colucci, E. Di Sciascio, and F. Donini. Partial and informative common subsumers of concepts collections in description logics. In Proc. of the 21st Intl. Workshop on Description Logics (DL'08), 2008.
13. DAML+OIL. DAML+OIL Specifications. www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index. html, 2001.
14. T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, and F. Donini. Semantic matchmaking as non-monotonic reasoning: A description logic approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 29:269-307, 2007.
15. G. Hamel and C. K. Prahalad. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June:79-91, 1990.
16. D. S. Johnson. A catalog of complexity classes. In Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume A: Algorithms and Complexity, pages 67-161. 1990.
17. R. Küsters and R. Molitor. Structural Subsumption and Least Common Subsumers in a Description Logic with Existential and Number Restrictions. Studia Logica, 81:227-259, 2005.
18. C. C. Markides and P. J. Williamson. Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15:49-65, 1994.
19. D. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Hendler, and L. Stein. DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web . IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(5):72-80, 2002.
20. R. Möller, V. Haarslev, and B. Neumann. Semantics-based information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Systems (IT&KNOWS'98), Vienna, Budapest, 1998.
21. B. Nebel. Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems, volume 422 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
22. R. R. Nelson. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12:61-74, 1991.
23. OWL. www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, 2004.