A "quick and dirty" website data quality indicator

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 43-46

  Gelman, Irit Askira ^a   Barletta, Anthony L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Data quality; Data quality indicator; Indicator; Information credibility; Information quality; Quick and dirty; Web data

Indexed keywords

DATA QUALITY; DATA QUALITY INDICATOR; INDICATOR; INFORMATION CREDIBILITY; INFORMATION QUALITY; QUICK AND DIRTY; WEB DATA;

DATA REDUCTION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; RESEARCH; SEARCH ENGINES; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 70349257735     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1458527.1458538     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Amento, B., Terveen, L., and Hill, W. 2000. Does "Authority" Mean Quality? Predicting Expert Quality Ratings of Web Documents" in Proceedings of the Twenty- Third Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2000.
2. Bagrow, J. P. , Rozenfeld, H. D., Bollt, E. M., and ben- Avraham, D. 2004. How famous is a scientist?-Famous to those who know us, Europhysics Letters, Vol. 67 , No. 4, 2004, pp. 511-516.
3. Cappielo, C. and Pernici, B. 2006. A Methodology for Information Quality Management in Self-Healing Web Services, 11th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-06), MIT, Cambridge MA, 2006.
4. Cilibrasi, R.L., and Vitányi, P.M.B. 2007. The Google Similarity Index, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2007, pp. 370-383.
5. Eppler, M.J., Algesheimer, R., and Dimpfel, M. 2003. Quality Criteria of Content-driven Websites and their Influence on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Empirical Test of an Information Quality Framework. 8th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-03), MIT, Cambridge MA, 2003.
6. Krebs, V. 2003. What's your Google Number? International Association for Human Resource Information Management Journal, Vol. VII, No. 2, 2003, pp. 40-42.
7. Matsuo, Y., Tomobe, H., and Nishimura, T. 2007. Robust Estimation of Google Counts for Social Network Extraction. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2007, pp. 1395-1401.
8. Pion, S., and Hamel, L. 2007. The Internet Democracy: A redictive Model Based on Web Text Mining, International Conference on Data Mining, 2007, pp. 292-300.
9. Pun, J.C.C., and Lochovsky, F.H. 2004. Ranking search results by web quality dimensions, Journal of Web Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 3-4, 2004, pp. 216-235.
10. Pun, J.C.C., and Lochovsky, F.H. 2005. Finding High- Quality Web Pages Using Cohesiveness. 10th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-05), MIT, Cambridge MA, 2005.
11. Schrock, Kathy. 2008. Critical Evaluation of a Web Site: Secondary School Level. Kathy Schrock's Guide for Educators, DiscoverySchool.com. http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/evalhigh.html [June 5, 2008]
12. Simkin, M.V., and Roychowdhury V.P. 2006. Theory of Aces: Fame by Chance or Merit?"The Journal of Mathematical Sociology , Vol. 30, No. 1, 2006, pp. 33-41.
13. Stvilia, B., Twidale, M.B., Smith, L.C., and Les Gasser 2005. Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia. 10th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-05), MIT, Cambridge MA, 2005.
14. Sweetland, J.H. 2000. Reviewing the World Wide Web- Theory Versus Reality, Library Trends, Spring 2000.
15. Ury, Connie and Lori Mardis. 2008. Evaluating Websites: PART of the Research Process. http://www.nwmissouri.edu/library/courses/evaluation/edeval. htm [5 June 2008]
16. Virginia Tech 2008. Evaluating Internet Information, http://www.lib.vt. edu/help/instruct/evaluate/evaluating.html [June 5, 2008].
17. R.Y. Wang and D.M. Strong 1996. Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers, Journal of Management Information Systems 12(4) (1996).