Evaluation of prediction methods applied to an inflected language

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2448, Issue , 2002, Pages 397-403

  Garay Vitoria, Nestor ^a   Abascal, Julio ^a   Gardeazabal, Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN REHABILITATION ENGINEERING;

AUGMENTATIVE-AND-ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; HIT RATIO; KEYSTROKE SAVINGS; PREDICTION METHODS; PREDICTIVE SYSTEMS; TIME UNITS; WORD PREDICTION;

FORECASTING;

EID: 70349256981     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46154-x_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Agirre E., Alegria I., Arregi X., Artola X., Díaz de Ilarraza A., Maritxalar M., Sarasola K., and Urkia M. 1992. XUXEN: A Spelling Checker/Corrector for Basque Based on Two-Level Morphology. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing Association for Computational Linguistics. 119–125.
2. Allen J. 1995. Natural Language Understanding. Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company. 2nd Edition.
3. Alm N., Arnott J.L. and Newell A.F. 1992. Prediction and Conversational Momentum in an Augmentative Communication System. Communications of the ACM 35, Number 5. 46–57.
4. Bertenstam J. and Hunnicutt S. 1995. Adding Morphology to a Word Predictor. The European Context for Assistive Technology (Proceedings of the 2nd TIDE Congress). IOS Press/Ohmsa, Bruselas. 312–315.
5. Carlberger J. 1997. Design and Implementation of a Probabilistic Word Prediction Program. Master’s Thesis in Computer Science, NADA, KTH, Stockholm (Sweden). Taken from http://www.speech.kth.se/~johanc/thesis/thesis.doc.
6. Darragh J. J., Witten I. H. and James M. L. 1990. The Reactive Keyboard: A Predictive Typing Aid. Computer, 23 (Number 11 November). 41–49.
7. Garay-Vitoria N. and González-Abascal J. 1997. Intelligent Word-Prediction to Enhance Text Input Rate. Proceedings of the Intelligent User Interfaces 97 Congress. ACM Press, New York (USA). 241–244.
8. Garay-Vitoria N. and Abascal J. G. 1997. Word Prediction for Inflected Languages. Application to Basque Language. Proceedings of the Natural Language Processing for Communication Aids Workshop Sponsored by the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics. 29–36.
9. Garay-Vitoria, N. 2001. Sistemas de Predicción Lingüística. Aplicación a Idiomas con Alto y Bajo Grado de Flexión, en el Ámbito de la Comunicación Alternativa y Aumentativa. Servicio Editorial de la UPV-EHU, Leioa (Bizkaia). ISBN: 84-8373-355-2.
10. Heinisch B. and Hecht J. 1993.Word Prediction: A Comparison of Six Programs. TAM Newsletter, 4–9. Taken from http://www.edc.org./FSC/NCIP/.
11. Higginbotham D. 1992. Evaluation of Keystroke Savings Across Five Assistive Communication Technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8. 258–272.
12. Koester H.H. and Levine S.P. 1998. Model Simulations of User Performance withWord Prediction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 14, 25–35.
13. Van Dyke J. A. 1991.Word Prediction for Disabled Users: Applying Natural Language Processing to Enhance Communication. Thesis submitted for the degree of Honors Bachelor of Arts in Cognitive Studies. University of Delaware.
14. Venkatagiri H.S. 1993. Efficiency of Lexical Prediction as a Communication Acceleration Technique. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9. 161–167.