Five-year longitudinal effect of radical perineal prostatectomy on health-related quality of life in Japanese men, using general and disease-specific measures

BJU International

Volumn 104, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1077-1084

  Inoue, Shogo ^a   Shiina, Hiroaki ^a   Hiraoka, Takeo ^a   Wake, Koji ^a   Sumura, Masahiro ^a   Honda, Satoshi ^a   Urakami, Shinji ^a   Igawa, Mikio ^a   Usui, Tsuguru ^b  

^a SHIMANE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Japanese patients; Longitudinal survey; Prostate cancer; Quality of life; Radical perineal prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; JAPANESE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URINARY DYSFUNCTION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70349245212     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08491.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arai Y, Egawa S, Tobisu K et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: time trends, morbidity and mortality in Japan. BJU Int 2000 85 : 287 294
2. Weldon VE. Technique of modern radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 2002 60 : 689 694
3. Matsubara A, Yasumoto H, Mutaguchi K et al. Impact of radical perineal prostatectomy on urinary continence and quality of life: a longitudinal study of Japanese patients. Int J Urol 2005 12 : 953 958
4. Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H, Cohen R. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1995 153 : 1565 1569
5. Boccon-Gibod L, Ravery V, Vordos D, Toublanc M, Delmas V, Boccon-Gibod L. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions. J Urol 1998 160 : 1383 1385
6. Sullivan LD, Weir MJ, Kinahan JF, Taylor DL. A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2000 85 : 95 100
7. Haab F, Boccon-Gibod L, Delmas V, Boccon-Gibod L, Toublanc M. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1994 74 : 626 629
8. Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Paulson DF. Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach. J Urol 1992 147 : 888 890
9. Catalona WJ, Smith DS. Cancer recurrence and survival rates after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: intermediate-term results. J Urol 1998 160 : 2428 2434
10. Meng MV, Carroll PR. When is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary before radical prostatectomy? A decision analysis. J Urol 2000 164 : 1235 1240
11. Litwin MS. Measuring health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. J Urol 1994 152 : 1882 1887
12. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr., Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993 31 : 247 263
13. Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A et al. The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care 1998 36 : 1002 1012
14. Wiygul JB, Harris MJ, Dahm P. Early patient self-assessed outcomes of nerve-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy. Urology 2005 66 : 582 586
15. Namiki S, Egawa S, Terachi T et al. Changes in quality of life in first year after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, laparoscopic, and perineal approach: Multi-institutional longitudinal study in Japan. Urology 2006 67 : 321 327
16. Lim AJ, Brandon AH, Fiedler J et al. Quality of life: radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1995 154 : 1420 1425
17. Hu JC, Elkin EP, Pasta DJ et al. Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE. J Urol 2004 171 : 703 707
18. Soderdahl DW, Davis JW, Schellhammer PF et al. Prospective longitudinal comparative study of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing invasive treatments for localized prostate cancer. J Endourol 2005 19 : 318 326
19. Yang BK, Young MD, Calingaert B et al. Prospective and longitudinal patient self-assessment of health-related quality of life following radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 2004 172 : 264 268
20. Partin AW, Mangold LA, Lamm DM, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Pearson JD. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 2001 58 : 843 848
21. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998 160 : 2418 2424
22. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases 1905. J Urol 2002 167 : 939 946
23. Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51 : 1037 1044
24. Kakehi Y, Kamoto T, Ogawa O et al. Development of Japanese version of the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: a pilot validation study. Int J Clin Oncol 2002 7 : 306 311
25. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999 11 : 319 326
26. Talcott JA, Rieker P, Clark JA et al. Patient-reported symptoms after primary therapy for early prostate cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 1998 16 : 275 283
27. Clark JA, Rieker P, Propert KJ, Talcott JA. Changes in quality of life following treatment for early prostate cancer. Urology 1999 53 : 161 168
28. Young MD, Weizer AZ, Silverstein AD et al. Urinary continence and quality of life in the first year after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 2003 170 : 2374 2378
29. Schmeller N, Keller H, Janetschek G. Head-to-head comparison of retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2007 14 : 402 405
30. Young HH. Conservative perineal prostatectomy. The results of two years' experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann Surg 1905 41 : 549 557
31. Korman HJ, Mulholland TL, Huang R. Preservation of fecal continence and bowel function after radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy: a questionnaire-based outcomes study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2004 7 : 249 252
32. Bannowsky A, Schulze H, van der Horst C, Hautmann S, Junemann KP. Recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: improvement with nightly low-dose sildenafil. BJU Int 2008 101 : 1279 1283